Regular ArticleLarge Visuospatial Sex Difference in Line Judgment: Possible Role of Attentional Factors☆
References (31)
- et al.
Spatial ability, navigation strategy, and geographic knowledge among men and women
Evolution and Human Behavior
(1998) - et al.
Sex differences in route-learning
Personality and Individual Differences
(1993) - et al.
Visuospatial judgment and right hemisphere disease
Cortex
(1992) - et al.
Understanding the surface orientation of liquids
Cognitive Psychology
(1991) - et al.
Gender differences in incidental learning and visual recognition memory: Support for a sex difference in unconscious environmental awareness
Personality and Individual Differences
(1998) - et al.
Measures of adult performance on Piaget's water horizontality task
Intelligence
(1984) - et al.
The role of experience in spatial test performance: A meta-analysis
Sex Roles
(1989) - et al.
Contributions to neuropsychological assessment: A clinical manual
(1983) - et al.
Visuospatial judgment: A clinical test
Archives of Neurology
(1978) - et al.
Mediators of gender differences in mathematics college entrance test scores: A comparison of spatial skills with internalized beliefs and anxieties
Child Development
(1997)
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
Human behavioral sex differences: A role for gonadal hormones during early development?
Psychological Bulletin
Sexual selection and sex differences in mathematical abilities
Behavioral & Brain Sciences
Youth sport participation and associated sex differences on a measure of spatial ability
Perceptual and Motor Skills
Sex differences in cognitive abilities
Cited by (76)
Sex, mathematics, and the brain: An evolutionary perspective
2022, Developmental ReviewCitation Excerpt :These spatial maps are composed of large-scale geometric relations and positioning of objects in space and provide a type of ‘bird's eye view’ of the ecology. Aspects of visuospatial attention also appear to support navigation through the allocation of attention to Euclidean features of space that would result in a heightened sensitivity to directional orientation (Collaer & Nelson, 2002; Goyette, McCoy, Kennedy, & Sullivan, 2012). The brain systems that support many aspects of folk physics also include areas that support the representation of relative magnitude, such as distance (Summerfield, Luyckx, & Sheahan, 2020).
Boys’ visuospatial abilities compensate for their relatively poor in-class attentive behavior in learning mathematics
2021, Journal of Experimental Child PsychologyNo difference in cognitive performance or gender role behavior between men with and without hypospadias
2019, Hormones and BehaviorCognitive abilities in women with complete androgen insensitivity syndrome and women with gonadal dysgenesis
2018, PsychoneuroendocrinologySpace in Neuropsychological Assessment
2017, Neuropsychology of Space: Spatial Functions of the Human BrainReduced short term memory in congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) and its relationship to spatial and quantitative performance
2016, PsychoneuroendocrinologyCitation Excerpt :Participants match spatial attributes of target lines to 13 comparison lines. This task shows a large sex difference favoring males (Collaer and Nelson, 2002). Water level.
- ☆
We thank Jenny Walton, Karen Moore, and John Bain for assistance with data collection. We also thank Susan M. Campbell, Diane F. Halpern, and Lynn S. Liben for helpful comments on earlier versions of the article. This study was supported in part by a grant from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Grant 71196-504602.
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Marcia L. Collaer, Department of Psychology, Middlebury College, Middlebury, VT 05753. Fax: 802-443-2072. E-Mail: [email protected].
- 1
Present address: Department of Psychology, Fordham University, 441 East Fordham Road, Bronx, NY 10458.