Regular Article
Lucid Dreaming as Metacognition: Implications for Cognitive Science

https://doi.org/10.1006/ccog.1994.1014Get rights and content

Abstract

Evidence of reflective awareness and metacognitive monitoring during REM sleep dreaming poses a significant challenge to the commonly held view of dream cognition as necessarily deficient relative to waking cognition. To date, dream metacognition has not received the theoretical or experimental attention it deserves. As a result, discussions of dream cognition have been underrepresented in theoretical accounts of consciousness. This paper argues for using a converging measures approach to investigate the range and limits of cognition and metacognition across the sleep–wakefulness cycle. The paradigm developed by LaBerge and his colleagues to study "lucid-control" dreaming offers one such framework for relating phenomenological, cognitive, and physiological measures. In a lucid-control dream, the dreamer is both aware that the experimental context is a dream (lucidity) and has the ability to intentionally regulate aspects of the dream (control). Subjects can make patterns of deliberate eye movements to signal from the dream and thus index significant events such as the time of lucidity onset and the completion of previously agreed-upon tasks in the dream. Lucid dreaming and other examples of reflective awareness during dreaming have important implications for models of human cognition. The existence of these phenomena raises fundamental questions about current assumptions regarding "state" constraints on consciousness and cognition (i.e., the notion that dreaming involves exclusively nonconscious processing while waking involves conscious processing).

References (0)

Cited by (75)

  • Consciousness and Meta-Consciousness During Sleep <sup>☆</sup>

    2019, Handbook of Behavioral Neuroscience
    Citation Excerpt :

    In addition to the metacognitive awareness of the state of consciousness, which is the defining feature of the state, during lucid dreams, episodic memory (including memory of one's waking life) is also typically restored and an ability to direct one's attention and actions volitionally (Dresler et al., 2014). Moreover, lucid dreaming is not an all-or-nothing phenomenon, but can occur in different degrees across these cognitive dimensions (Kahan & LaBerge, 1994; Tyson, Ogilvie, & Hunt, 1984). As will be discussed below, all of these features, including metacognition, autobiographical memory and volitional control, have been linked to self-related processing, suggesting that lucid dreaming may be a valuable model for exploring the neurobiological factors that contribute to the unique form of self-consciousness in humans (Windt & Metzinger, 2007).

  • How bizarre? A pluralist approach to dream content

    2018, Consciousness and Cognition
    Citation Excerpt :

    This is a bizarre element it itself. The view that we lack metacognition, rational capacity and other important cognitive features is known as the “deficiency view” of dream cognition (Kahan & LaBerge, 1994), which would explain why we don’t realise that bizarre elements are bizarre. High limbic activity, especially the amygdala and low prefrontal and parietal activity and heterogeneous activity of all sensory cortices in different periods of REM (Kussé et al., 2010) might explain bizarre features, with similarities between relevant hyperactivation and reduced activation in dreaming and lesions in sufferers of delusions (Schwartz & Maquet, 2002).

  • Games, Dreams and Consciousness: Absorption and Perception, Cognition, Emotion

    2017, Boundaries of Self and Reality Online: Implications of Digitally Constructed Realities
  • Lucid Dreaming Frequency and Sensory-Processing Sensitivity

    2022, Imagination, Cognition and Personality
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text