Regular Article
Slit Promotes Branching and Elongation of Neurites of Interneurons But Not Projection Neurons from the Developing Telencephalon

https://doi.org/10.1006/mcne.2002.1156Get rights and content

Abstract

Proper neuronal migration and establishment of circuitry are key processes for laying down the functional network of cortical neurons. A variety of environmental guidance cues, attractive or repulsive, have been shown to guide cell migration and axon arborization. One of these, Slit, appears to possess contrarian properties; it can either inhibit axon outgrowth or promote branching and elongation. The object of the present study was to assess the effect of Slit on MGE and neocortical neurons in culture and in the developing ventricle. When cocultured with a Slit source, E13.5 MGE explants displayed inhibited neurite outgrowth while GABA neuron dispersion away from Slit was increased. Similar inhibition of neurite outgrowth was seen in dissociated cells from E13.5 MGE, these cells were identified to be interneurons based upon their GABA staining. In contrast, E13.5 interneurons, after culture for another 5 days, were responsive to Slit by neurite branching and elongation. Projection neurons, identified by lack of GABA staining, did not respond to Slit, either by branching or elongation. Furthermore, GABA interneurons but not pyramidal neurons, appeared to avoid neocortical areas close to an implanted source of Slit in the ventricular wall. These results lead us to suggest that interneurons but not projection neurons are responsive to the chemorepellant effect of Slit. However, more mature interneurons appear to respond to Slit by neurite arborization. These results demonstrate a selective response to Slit by GABAergic neurons during neocortical development.

Key Words: slit; ganglion eminence; neocortex; axon branching; GABA; projection neuron.

References (49)

  • S.J. Pleasure et al.

    Cell migration from the ganglionic eminences is required for the development of hippocampal GABAergic interneurons

    Neuron

    (2000)
  • D.J. Schreyer et al.

    Growth and target finding by axons of the corticospinal tract in the prenatal and postnatal rat

    Neuroscience

    (1982)
  • T. Serafini et al.

    Netrin-1 is required for commissural axon guidance in the developing vertebrate nervous system

    Cell

    (1996)
  • D. Van Vactor et al.

    The middle and the end: slit brings guidance and branching together in axon pathway selection

    Neuron

    (1999)
  • K.H. Wang et al.

    Biochemical purification of a mammalian slit protein as a positive regulator of sensory axon elongation and branching

    Cell

    (1999)
  • K.L. Whitford et al.

    Regulation of cortical dendrite development by slit-robo interactions

    Neuron

    (2002)
  • W. Yuan et al.

    The mouse SLIT family: secreted ligands for ROBO expressed in patterns that suggest a role in morphogenesis and axon guidance

    Dev. Biol.

    (1999)
  • Y. Zhu et al.

    Cellular and molecular guidance of GABAergic neuronal migration from an extracortical origin to the neocortex

    Neuron

    (1999)
  • S.A. Anderson et al.

    Interneuron migration from basal forebrain to neocortex: Dependence on Dlx genes

    Science

    (1997)
  • S. Anderson et al.

    Differential origins of neocortical projection and local circuit neurons: Role of Dlx genes in neocortical interneuronogenesis

    Cereb. Cortex

    (1999)
  • S.A. Anderson et al.

    Distinct cortical migrations from the medial and lateral ganglionic eminences

    Development

    (2001)
  • D. Bagnard et al.

    Semaphorins act as attractive and repulsive guidance signals during the development of cortical projections

    Development

    (1998)
  • J.H. Chen et al.

    The N-terminal leucine-rich region in Slit are sufficient to repel olfactory bulb axons and subventricular zone neurons

    J. Neurosci.

    (2001)
  • F. Conti et al.

    Glutamate-positive neurons in the somatic sensory cortex of rats and monkeys

    J. Neurosci.

    (1987)
  • Cited by (19)

    • A subset of chicken statoacoustic ganglion neurites are repelled by Slit1 and Slit2

      2014, Hearing Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Not only was the average neurite length similar between control and Slit-treated groups, but the outgrowth density was also comparable. Slits are also known to have effects on branching (Sang et al., 2002). If there were differences in neurite complexity or other features, some of those may have been revealed quantitatively by the pixel measurements.

    • Midbrain dopaminergic axons are guided longitudinally through the diencephalon by Slit/Robo signals

      2011, Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience
      Citation Excerpt :

      Growth medium (50% F12/40% optimem/10% fetal calf serum/1× pen-strep/1× glutamax) was added to the well and explants were allowed to grow for 48 h. After fixation, explants and cell aggregates were immunolabeled using standard technique (Lin et al., 2005; Sang et al., 2002). Aggregates transfected with Slit2 were labeled to verify Slit2 expression with mouse anti-c-myc (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, 1:200 dilution) and Cy2-conjugated secondary antibody (1:200).

    • Robo4 signaling in endothelial cells implies attraction guidance mechanisms

      2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry
      Citation Excerpt :

      These results support the notion that Robo1 and Robo4 might be co-expressed in varying amounts on endothelial cells (10), and regulation of signals from each could determine the ultimate path of the endothelial growing tip. In fact, precedence for different combinations of robo receptors mediating attractive versus repulsive signals does exist in Drosophila tracheal branching network (35) and is suggestive in studies where slit promotes branching and elongation of neurites of selective neuron while inhibiting others (36). Our study extends this observation to perhaps vascular guidance as well and whether these signals arise from common or separate ligand is unclear.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Fax: 61 3 9348 1707. E-mail: [email protected].

    View full text