Skip to main content
Log in

Basic organization of operant behavior as revealed in Drosophila flight orientation

  • Published:
Journal of Comparative Physiology A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Operant behavior is studied in tethered Drosophila flies using visual motion, heat or odour as operandum and yaw torque, thrust or direction of flight as operans in various combinations (Fig. 1). On the basis of these results a conceptual framework of operant behavior is proposed: (1) It requires a goal (desired state) of which the actual state deviates. (2) To attain the goal a range of motor programs is activated (initiating activity, see Fig. 7). (3) Efference copies of the motor programs are compared to the sensory input referring to the deviation from the desired state (e.g. by cross-correlation). (4) In case of a significant coincidence the respective motor program is used to modify the sensory input in the direction towards the goal. (5) Consistent control of a sensory stimulus by a behavior may lead to a more permanent behavioral change (conditioning). In this scheme operant activity (1–4) and operant conditioning (1–5) are distinguished.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ALU :

arbitrary length unit

d :

horizontal angular width of visual pattern

IR :

infrared

SEM :

standard error of the means

T :

yaw torque

Th :

thrust

λ:

performance index

ψ:

horizontal angle between visual pattern position and longitudinal body axis of the fly

δ:

vertical angular extension of visual pattern

References

  • Adler J (1976) The sensing of chemicals by Bacteria. Sci Am 234, No. 4:40–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Booker R, Quinn WG (1981) Conditioning of leg positioning in normal and mutant Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78:3940–3944

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggermont JJ (1990) The correlative brain. Theory and experiment in neural interaction. In: Braitenberg V (ed) Studies of brain function, vol. XVI. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Heisenberg M, Wolf R (1979) On the fine structure of yaw torque in visual flight orientation of Drosophila melanogaster. J Comp Physiol 130:113–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Heisenberg M, Wolf R (1984) Vision in Drosophila Genetics of microbehavior. In: Braitenberg V (ed) Studies of brain function, vol. XII. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Heisenberg M, Wolf R (1988) Reafferent control of optomotor yaw torque in Drosophila melanogaster. J Comp Physiol A 163:373–388

    Google Scholar 

  • Held R (1965) Plasticity in sensory-motor systems. Sci Am 213, No. 5:84–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Horridge GA (1962) Learning of leg position in headless insects. Nature 222:354–356

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyle G (1979) Mechanisms of simple motor learning. Trends Neurosci 2:153–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Kupfermann I (1981) Learning. In: Kandel ER, Schwartz JH (eds) Principles of neural science. Elsevier North Holland, New York, pp 572

    Google Scholar 

  • Mariath HA (1985) Operant conditioning in Drosophila melanogaster wild-type and learning mutants with defects in the cyclic AMP metabolism. J Insect Physiol 31:779–787

    Google Scholar 

  • Möhl B (1988) Short-term learning during flight control in Locusta migratoria. J Comp Physiol A 163:803–812

    Google Scholar 

  • Möhl B (1989) ‘Biological noise’ and plasticity of sensorimotor pathways in the locust flight system. J Comp Physiol A 166:75–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlov IP (1927) Conditioned reflexes: An investigation of the physiological activity of the cerebral cortex. Oxford University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner BF (1950) Are theories of learning necessary? Psychol Rev 57:193–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike EL (1911) Animal intelligence. Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf R, Heisenberg M (1986) Visual orientation in motion-blind flies is an operant behavior. Nature 323:154–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf R, Heisenberg M (1990) Visual control of straight flight in Drosophila melanogaster. J Comp Physiol A 167:269–283

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wolf, R., Heisenberg, M. Basic organization of operant behavior as revealed in Drosophila flight orientation. J Comp Physiol A 169, 699–705 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00194898

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00194898

Key words

Navigation