Skip to main content
Log in

Slant-tilt: The visual encoding of surface orientation

  • Published:
Biological Cybernetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A specific form for the internal representation of local surface orientation is proposed, which is similar to Gibson's (1950) “amount and direction of slant”. Slant amount is usually quantifed by the angle σ between the surface normal and the line of sight (0°≦σ≦90°). Slant direction corresponds to the direction of the gradient of distance from the viewer to the surface, and may be defined by the image direction τ to which the surface normal would project (0°≦τ≦360°). Since the direction of slant is specified by the tilt of the projected surface normal, it is referred to as surface tilt (Stevens, 1979; Marr, 1982). The two degrees of freedom of orientation are therefore quantified by slant, an angle measured perpendicular to the image plane, and tilt, an angle measured in the image plane. The slanttilt form provides several computational advantages relative to some other proposals and is consistent with various psychological phenomena. Slant might be encoded by various means, e.g. by the cosine of the angle, by the tangent, or linearly by the angle itself. Experimental results are reported that suggest that slant is encoded by an internal parameter that varies linearly with slant angle, with resolution of roughly one part in 100. Thus we propose that surface orientation is encoded in human vision by two quantities, one varying linearly with slant angle, the other varying linearly with tilt angle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Attneave, F.: Representation of physical space. In: Coding processes in human memory, Melton, A.W., Martin, E. eds., New York: Wiley 1972

    Google Scholar 

  • Attneave, F., Frost, R.: The determination of perceived tridimensional orientation by minimum criteria. Percep. Psychophys. 6, 391–396 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  • Balch, W., Milewski, A., Yonas, A.: Mechanisms underlying the slant aftereffect, Percept. Psychophys. 21, 581–585 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergman, R., Gibson, J.J.: The negative after-effect of the perception of a surface slanted in the third dimension. Am. J. Psychol. 72, 364–374 (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, W.C., Smith, A.H., Rabe, A.: The interaction of surface texture, outline gradient, and in the perception of slant. Can. J. Psychol. 10, 1–8 (1956)

    Google Scholar 

  • Flock, H.R.: Optical texture and linear perspective as stimuli for slant perception. Psychol. Rev. 72, 505–514 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  • Flock, H.R., Graves, D., Tenney, J., Stephenson, B.: Slant judgments of single rectangles at a slant. Psychon. Sci. 7, 57–58 (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  • Foley, J.M.: The size distance relation and intrinsic geometry of visual space: implications for processing. Vision Res. 12, 323–332 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J.J.: The perception of visual surfaces. Am. J. Psychol. 63, 367–384 (1950)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J.J.: The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin 1966

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, D.A.: Static and dynamic visual fields in human space perception. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 55, 1296–1303 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, R.L.: The intellignet eye. New York: McGraw-Hill 1970

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmholtz, H.L.F. von: Treatise on physiological optics. Transl. by J.P. Southall, New York: Dover Publications 1925

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, D.D.: Interring local surface orientation from motion fields. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 72, 888–892

  • Horn, B.K.P.: Obtaining shape from shading information. In: The psychology of computer vision, Winston, P.H. ed. New York: McGraw-Hill 1975

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, P.K.: Perceived shape and its dependency on perceived slant. J. Exp. Psychol. 75, 345–353 (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenderink, J.J., van Doorn, A.J.: Local structure of movement parallax of the plane. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 66, 717–723 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler, W., Emery, D.: Figural aftereffects in the third dimension of visual space. Am. J. Psychol. 60, 159–201 (1947)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraft, A.L., Winnick, W.A.: The effect of pattern and texture gradient on slant and shape judgments. Percept. Psychophys. 1967, 141–147 (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  • Longuet-Higgins, H.C., Prazdny, K.: The interpretation of a moving retinal image. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 208, 385–397 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackworth, A.K.: Interpreting pictures of polyhedral scenes. Art. Intell. 4, 121–137 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • Marr, D.: Early processing of visual information. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 275, 483–524 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Marr, D.: Representing visual information. AAAS 143rd Annual Meeting, Symposium on Some Mathematical Questions in Biology, February. In: Lectures in the Life Sciences 10, 101–180 (1978)

  • Marr, D.: Vision: a computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. San Franscisco: Freeman 1982

    Google Scholar 

  • Marr, D., Hildreth, E.: Theory of edge detection. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 207, 187–217 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  • Marr, D., Poggio, T.: From understanding computation to under-standing neural circuitry. Neurosci. Res. Prog. Bull. 15, 470–488 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  • Marr, D., Nishihara, K.: Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B. 200, 269–294 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakayama, K., Loomis, J.M.: Optical velocity patterns, velocitysensitive neurons, and space perception: a hypothesis. Perception 3, 63–80 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, R.K.: Slant judgments from static and rotating trapezoids correspond to rules of perspective geometry. Percept. Psychophys. 15, 509–516 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Prazdny, K.: Egomotion and relative depth map from optical flow. Biol. Cybern. 36, 87–102 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  • Purdy, W.C.: The hypothesis of psychophysical correspondence in space perception. General Electric Technical Information Series, No. R60 ELC 56 (1960)

  • Richards, W.. Visual space perception. In: Handbook of perception, Vol. V. Carterette, E.C., Friedman, M.P. eds. New York: Academic Press 1975

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A.H.: Interaction of form and exposure time in the perception of slant. Percpet. Motor Skills 20, 481–490 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, K.A.: Representing and analyzing surface orientation. In: Artificial intelligence: an MIT perspective. Winston, P.H., Brown, R.H. eds. Cambridge: MIT Press 1979

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, K.A.: The visual interpretation of surface contours. Art. Intell. 17, 47–73 (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, K.A.: The information content of texture gradients. Biol. Cybern. 42, 95–105 (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, K.A.: Surface tilt (the direction of slant): a neglected psychophysical variable. Percep. Psychophys. (in press)

  • Ullman, S.: The interpretation of visual motion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press 1979

    Google Scholar 

  • Witkin, A.P.: Estimating shape from texture. Art. Intell. 17, 17–45 (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  • Youngs, W.M.: The influence of perspective and disparity cues on the perception of slant. Vision Res. 16, 79–82 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stevens, K.A. Slant-tilt: The visual encoding of surface orientation. Biol. Cybern. 46, 183–195 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00336800

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00336800

Keywords

Navigation