Skip to main content
Log in

Neuronal processing of conspecific and related calls in the torus semicircularis ofRana r. ridibunda Pall. (Anura): single-unit recordings

Journal of Comparative Physiology A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

  1. 1.

    Single-unit responses in the torus semicircularis ofRana ridibunda were analyzed with regard to the neuronal mechanisms underlying call identification. Particular attention was directed to the question whether discrimination among the conspecific calls (mating, territorial and release calls), and between these and the mating calls of the related speciesR. lessonae and of the hybridR. esculenta, can be explained by differences in the neuronal responses.

  2. 2.

    75% of the single cells responded to at least one call. 25% of the neurons in this group were selective in the sense that they failed to respond to at least one of the calls.

  3. 3.

    Three of the single cells were selective for one type of call alone, the conspecific mating call in each case. Most of the selective neurons responded to three calls, having a preference either for the conspecific calls or for the amplitude-modulated mating calls. Such responses can be explained by the neurons' operation as either frequency or time filters.

  4. 4.

    Even the neurons that were nonselective, responding in some way to all the calls, differentiated among them with regard to response magnitude; that is, either the territorial and release calls elicited higher discharge rates than the amplitude-modulated mating calls, or the reverse. 69.8% of the single cells exhibited maximal responses to the conspecific mating call. The territorial and release calls elicited maximal responses in only 7.8% of the single cells.

  5. 5.

    In discrimination among the three mating calls, the temporal pattern of the calls plays a role. The differences in pulse-group timing are encoded by the overall response magnitude and not by way of differences in degree of synchronization. 66% of the nonselective neurons responded maximally to one of the three mating calls and very much less intensely to the other two.

  6. 6.

    No correlation was found between the types of call to which the various neurons responded maximally and the CF's of those neurons. Only very few cells represented a frequency and time filter exactly tuned to a particular call.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CF :

characteristic frequency

AM :

rate amplitude-modulation rate

MCr :

mating callR. ridibunda

MCl :

mating callR. lessonae

MCe :

mating callR. esculenta

TC :

territorial call

RC :

release call

MTR :

multiple-tone responder

References

  • Aertsen AMHJ, Johannesma PIM (1980) Spectra-temporal receptive fields of auditory neurons in the grassfrog. I. Characterization of tonal and natural stimuli. Biol Cybern 38:223–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Aertsen AMHJ, Johannesma PIM (1981) Spectro-temporal receptive fields of auditory neurons in the grassfrog. III. Analysis of the stimulus event relation for natural stimuli. Biol Cybern 39:195–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger L (1966) Biometrical studies on the population of green frogs from the environs of Poznan. Ann Zool 23:303–324

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger L (1973) Systematics and hybridization in European green frogs ofRana esculenta complex. J Herpetol 7:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger L (1977) Systematics and hybridization in theRana esculenta complex. In: Taylor DH, Guttman SI (eds) The reproductive biology of amphibians. Plenum Press, New York, pp 367–388

    Google Scholar 

  • Bibikov NG (1980) The reaction of the torus semicircularis units ofRana temporaria to the signals simulating the mating call temporal characteristics. Zool Zh 59:577–586

    Google Scholar 

  • Bibikov NG, Gorodetskaya ON (1980) Single unit responses in the auditory center of the frog mesencephalon to amplitude-modulation tones. Neirofizioliya 12:264–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Blankenhorn HJ (1977) Reproductive and mating behavior inRana lessonae — Rana esculenta mixed populations. In: Taylor DH, Guttman SI (eds) The reproductive biology of amphibians. Plenum Press, New York, pp 389–410

    Google Scholar 

  • Blankenhorn HJ, Heusser H, Vogel P (1971) Drei Phänotypen von Grünfröschen aus demRana esculenta-Komplex in der Schweiz. Rev Suisse Zool 78:1241–1247

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenowitz EA, Rose GJ, Capranica RR (1985) Neural correlates of temperature coupling in the vocal communication system of the gray treefrog (Hyla versicolor). Brain Res 359:364–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Brzoska J (1982) Vocal response of the male European water frogs (Rana esculenta complex) to mating and territorial calls. Behav Proc 17:37–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Brzoska J, Obert H-J (1980) Acoustic signals influencing the hormone production of the testes in the grass frog. J Comp Physiol 140:25–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Brzoska J, Schneider H, Nevo E (1982) Territorial behavior and vocal response in maleHyla arborea savignyi (Amphibia: Anura). Isr J Zool 31:27–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Capranica RR (1965) The evoked vocal response of the bullfrog. MIT Res Monogr No 33

  • Capranica RR (1966) Vocal response of the bullfrog to natural and synthetic mating calls. J Acoust Soc Am 40:1131–1139

    Google Scholar 

  • Capranica RR (1968) The vocal repertoire of the bullfrogRana catesbeiana. Behaviour 31:302–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Capranica RR, Brenowitz EA (1985) Time resolution in the auditory system of anurans. In: Michelsen A (ed) Time resolution in auditory systems. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 58–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Capranica RR, Moffat AJM (1983) Neurobehavioral correlates of sound communication in anurans. In: Ewert J-P, Capranica RR, Ingle DJ (eds) Advances in vertebrate neuroethology. Series A: Life Sciences 56. Plenum Publ Comp, New York, pp 701–730

    Google Scholar 

  • Capranica RR, Rose G (1983) Frequency and temporal processing in the auditory system of anurans. In: Huber F, Markl H (eds) Neuroethology and behavioral physiology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 136–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Epping WJM, Eggermont JJ (1986a) Sensitivity of neurons in the auditory midbrain of the grassfrog to temporal characteristics of sound. I. Stimulation with acoustic clicks. Hearing Res 24:37–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Epping WJM, Eggermont JJ (1986b) Sensitivity of neurons in the auditory midbrain of the grassfrog to temporal characteristics of sound. II. Stimulation with amplitude modulated sound. Hearing Res 24:55–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Frishkopf LS, Capranica RR, Goldstein MH (1968) Neural coding in the bullfrog's auditory system — A teleological approach. Proc IEEE 56:969–980

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuzessery ZM, Feng AS (1983) Mating call selectivity in the thalamus and midbrain of the leopard frog (Rana p. pipiens): single and multi unit analyses. J Comp Physiol 150:333–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerhardt HC (1974a) The vocalization of some hybrid tree-frogs: acoustic and behavioral analyses. Behav 49:130–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerhardt HC (1974b) The significance of some spectral features in the mating call recognition in the green treefrog. J Exp Biol 61:229–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Günther R (1973) Über die verwandtschaftlichen Beziehungen zwischen den europäischen Grünfröschen und dem Bastardcharakter vonR. esculenta L. (Anura). Zool Anz 190:250–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley DB (1980) Auditory and vocal nuclei in the frog brain concentrate sex hormones. Science 207:553–555

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemali M, Braitenberg V (1969) Atlas of the frog's brain. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn B, Schneider H (1984) Mating and territorial calls of the frogRana ridibunda and their temperature-dependent variability. Zool Anz (Jena) 212:273–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Loftus-Hills JJ, Littlejohn MJ (1971) Pulse repetition rate as the basis for mating call discrimination by two sympatric species ofHyla. Copeia 1971:154–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Megala AL (1983) Auditory response properties of the anuran thalamus: nonlinear facilitation. In: Ewert J-P, Capranica RR, Ingle DJ (eds) Advances in vertebrate neuroethology. Series A: Life Sciences 56. Plenum Publ Comp, New York, pp 895–899

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohneke R (1982) Coding of simple acoustic stimuli and conspecific calls in anuran auditory midbrain nuclei (Alytes o. obstetricans andBufo v. viridis). Zool Jb Physiol 86:90–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudry KM, Capranica RR (1976) Evoked potential activity in the auditory thalamus of the bullfrog; responses related to call detection. Acoust Soc Am 59:18

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudry KM, Capranica RR (1978) Correlation between the response selectivity of the auditory thalamic area of the green tree frog and call discrimination. J Acoust Soc Am 64:85

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudry KM, Capranica RR (1980) Evoked auditory activity within the telencephalon of the bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana). Brain Res 182:303–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudry KM, Constantine-Paton M, Capranica RR (1977) Auditory sensitivity of the diencephalon of the leopard frogRana p. pipiens. J Comp Physiol 114:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose G, Brenowitz EA, Capranica RR (1985) Species specificity and temperature dependency of temporal processing by the auditory midbrain of two species of treefrog. J Comp Physiol A 157:763–769

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose G, Capranica RR (1983) Temporal selectivity in the central auditory system of the leopard frog. Science 219:1087–1089

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose G, Capranica RR (1984) Processing amplitude-modulated sound by the auditory midbrain of two species of toads: matched temporal filters. J Comp Physiol A 154:211–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose G, Capranica RR (1985) Sensitivity of amplitude modulated sounds in the anuran auditory nervous system. J Neurophysiol 43:446–465

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider H (1973) Die Paarungsrufe einheimischer Ranidae (Anura, Amphibia). Bonn Zool Beitr 24:51–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider H (1982) Phonotaxis bei Weibchen des Kanarischen Laubfrosches,Hyla meridionalis. Zool Anz (Jena) 208:161–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider H, Brzoska J (1981) Die Befreiungsrufe der mitteleuropäischen Wasserfrösche. Zool Anz (Jena) 206:189–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider H, Tunner HG, Hödl W (1979) Beitrag zur Kenntnis des Paarungsrufes vonRana lessonae Camerano, 1882. Zool Anz (Jena) 202:20–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider-Lowitz B (1983) Neuronale Verarbeitung einfacher und komplexer Schallsignale in der Peripherie und den unteren Stationen der Hörbahn des Grasfrosches (Rana t. temporaria L.). Dissertation, Universität Bonn, Math-Nat Fakultät

  • Wahl M (1969) Untersuchungen zur Bio-Akustik des Wasser-froschesRana esculenta (L.). Oecologia 3:14–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Walkowiak W (1980) The coding of auditory signals in the torus semicircularis of the fire-bellied toad and the grass frog: responses to simple stimuli and conspecific calls. J Comp Physiol 138:131–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Walkowiak W (1984) Neuronal correlates of the recognition of pulsed sound signals in the grass frog. J Comp Physiol A 155:57–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Yovanof S, Feng AS (1983) Effects of estradiol on auditory evoked responses from the frog's auditory midbrain. Neurosci Lett 3:291–297

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Diekamp, B., Schneider, H. Neuronal processing of conspecific and related calls in the torus semicircularis ofRana r. ridibunda Pall. (Anura): single-unit recordings. J. Comp. Physiol. 163, 301–315 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00604006

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00604006

Keywords

Navigation