Skip to main content
Log in

Processing of sound signals by six types of neurons in the prothoracic ganglion of the cricket,Gryllus campestris L.

  • Published:
Journal of comparative physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

  1. 1.

    Six types of auditory neurons, arranged as mirror-image pairs, were characterized intracellularly within the prothoracic ganglion.

  2. 2.

    Two of the six neuron types are restricted to the prothoracic ganglion and exhibit an omegashaped structure (Fig. 2, ON1, ON2). Two other neuron types have axons ascending to the head ganglion (Fig. 2, AN1, AN2). A neuron with a descending axon (Fig. 2, DN1) and a T-shaped neuron (Fig. 2, TN) having both an ascending and a descending axon were also characterized.

  3. 3.

    Physiologically, these neuron types are characterized by their suprathreshold responses in the range of 2–20 kHz (Fig. 3), by the time course of epsps (Figs. 4 and 5), and by their responses related to monaural and binaural input (Fig. 6). ON1 is excited by the ear ipsilateral to the cell body and inhibited from the opposite ear (Fig. 6). AN1 and DN1 receive only excitatory input from the ear contralateral to the cell body (Fig. 6). ON2 and TN receive excitatory input from both ears (Fig. 6). Ipsilateral stimulation of AN2 at the calling song frequency results in a response ranging from weak excitation to strong inhibition; contralateral stimulation at moderate and high intensities is always excitatory, but can exhibit mixed excitation and inhibition (Figs. 6 and 7).

  4. 4.

    Artificial calling songs excite all six types of neurons. ON1, AN1, and DN1 copy both syllables and pauses more precisely than ON2, AN2, and TN.

  5. 5.

    All six neuron types copy the temporal sequence of calling songs containing syllables of 2.5 ms duration. Intersyllable pauses smaller than 5 ms are not copied by any of the neuron types (Fig. 8).

  6. 6.

    Artificial calling songs with a duty cycle of 50% (equal duration of syllable and pause) are phonotactically effective only when syllable intervals lie within the range of 20–60 ms. None of the neurons reported here are tuned specifically to this range (Fig. 9).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boyan GS (1980) Auditory neurons in the brain of the cricketGryllus bimaculatus (DeGeer). J Comp Physiol 140:81–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyan GS (1981) Two-tone suppression of an auditory neuron in the brain of the cricket: proposed role in phono tactic behavior. J Comp Physiol 144:117–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyan GS, Williams JLD (1981) Descending interneurones in the brain of the cricket: anatomy and responses to auditory stimuli. Naturwissenschaften 68:486

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyan GS, Williams JLD (1982) Auditory neurones in the brain of the cricketGryllus bimaculatus (DeGeer). II. Ascending interneurones. J Insect Physiol (in press)

  • Casaday GB, Hoy RR (1977) Auditory interneurons in the cricketTeleogryllus oceaniens: Physiological and anatomical properties. J Comp Physiol 121:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Eibl E, Huber F (1979) Central projections of tibial sensory fibers within the three thoracic ganglia of crickets (Grylluscampestris L.,Gryllus bimaculatus DeGeer). Zoomorphologie 92:1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Esch H, Huber F, Wohlers DW (1980) Primary auditory neurons in crickets: Physiology and central projections. J Comp Physiol 137:27–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill KG (1974) Acoustic communication in the Australian field cricketsTeleogryllus commodus andT. oceaniens (Orthoptera, Gryllidae). Thesis, University of Melbourne

  • Huber F (1980) Zoologische Grundlagenforschung aus der Sicht eines Insektenbiologen. Verh Dtsch Zool Ges 73:12–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchings M, Lewis B (1981) Response properties of primary auditory fibers in the cricketTeleogryllus oceanicus (Le Guillon) J Comp Physiol 143:129–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleindienst HU, Koch UT, Wohlers DW (1981) Analysis of the cricket auditory system by acoustic stimulation using a closed sound field. J Comp Physiol 141:283–296

    Google Scholar 

  • McFarland D, Houston A (1981) Quantitative ethology: The state space approach. Pitman Adv Publ Progr, Boston London Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Moiseff A (1980) Auditory interneurons and phono tactic behavior in the Australian field cricket,Teleogryllus oceanicus. PhD dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Moiseff A, Pollack GS, Hoy RR (1978) Steering responses of flying crickets to sound and ultrasound: Mate attraction and predator avoidance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 75:4052–4056

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollack GS, Hoy RR (1979) Temporal patterns as a cue for species specific calling song recognition in crickets. Science 204:429–432

    Google Scholar 

  • Popov AV, Shuvalov VF (1977) Phonotactic behavior of crickets. J Comp Physiol 119:111–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Popov AV, Shuvalov VF, Svetlogorskaya ID, Markovich AM (1974) Acoustic behavior and the auditory system in insects. In: Schwartzkopff J (ed) Mechanoreception. Abh Rhein Westf Akad Wiss Symp Bochum 53:281–306

  • Popov AV, Markovich AM, Andjan AS (1978) Auditory neurons in the prothoracic ganglion of the cricket,Gryllus bimaculatus (DeGeer). I. The large segmental auditory neuron (LSAN). J Comp Physiol 126:183–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Stout JF, Huber F (1972) Responses of central auditory neurons of female crickets (Grylluscampestris L.) to the calling song of the male. Z Vergl Physiol 76:302–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Stout JF, Huber F (1981) Responses to features of the calling song by ascending auditory neurones in the cricketGryllus campestris L. Physiol Entomol 6:199–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorson J, Weber T, Huber F (1982) Auditory behavior of the cricket. II. Simplicity of calling-song recognition inGryllus and anomalous phonotaxis at abnormal carrier frequencies. J Comp Physiol (in press)

  • Weber T, Thorson J, Huber F (1981) Auditory behavior of the cricket: I. Dynamics of compensated walking and discrimination paradigms on the Kramer treadmill. J Comp Physiol 141:215–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiese K (1978) Recurrent inhibition within the acoustic pathway ofGryllus bimaculatus as the basis of temporal filtering. Verh Dtsch Zool Ges 1978:168

    Google Scholar 

  • Wohlers DW (1980) Anatomical and physiological studies of the auditory pathway in crickets. Dissertation, Universität München

  • Wohlers DW, Huber F (1978) Intracellular recording and staining of cricket auditory interneurons (Grylluscampestris L.,Gryllus bimaculatus DeGeer). J Comp Physiol 127:11–28

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wohlers, D.W., Huber, F. Processing of sound signals by six types of neurons in the prothoracic ganglion of the cricket,Gryllus campestris L.. J. Comp. Physiol. 146, 161–173 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00610234

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00610234

Keywords

Navigation