Abstract
The effects of tetanus toxin (TeTx) and botulinum A toxin (BoTx) on spontaneous and nerve-evoked transmitter release have been compared in mouse hemidiaphragms poisoned in vitro. At 37°C endplates poisoned with either of these agents were characterized by (1) a decrease of miniature endplate potential (m.e.p.p.)-frequency to less than 30/min for TeTx and 3/min for BoTx, (2) reduced mean m.e.p.p.-amplitude and (3) 100% failure to show endplate potentials (e.p.p.s) in response to single nerve stimuli. In addition (4) tetanic nerve stimulation and/or reduction of temperature to about 20°C caused a remarkable increase in the nerveevoked transmitter release, but did not affect the low frequency of spontaneous m.e.p.p.s.
However, several important differences exist between the effects of both toxins. (1) At room temperature even single nerve stimuli could elicit e.p.p.s in BoTx-muscles the failure rate being about 80%. For TeTx the failure was 100%. However, if the nerve was stimulated with higher frequencies (>5Hz), the probability of quantal release increased, the delay for release from the onset of stimulation being several seconds and similar to that observed at 37°C. (2) TeTx distorted the synchronous release of quanta increasing the distribution of their synaptic delays. BoTx did not influence the time course of the phasic secretion process in response to nerve action potentials. (3) TeTx preferentially blocked the release of spontaneous m.e.p.p.s of large amplitude without affecting the frequency of the small amplitude ones, while BoTx inhibited both the small and large amplitude m.e.p.p.s. The distribution of the amplitudes of the nerve-evoked m.e.p.p.s were similar to those of spontaneous m.e.p.p.s before the blockade with the toxins.
We conclude that TeTx and BoTx act at different stages in the chain of events that result in spontaneous and in nerveevoked transmitter release at motor endplates.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boroff DA, del Castillo J, Evoy WH, Steinhardt RA (1974) Observations on the action of type A botulinum toxin on frog neuromuscular junctions. J Physiol (Lond) 240:227–253
Cull-Candy SG, Lundh H, Thesleff S (1976) Effects of botulinum toxin on neuromuscular transmission in the rat. J Physiol (Lond) 260:177–203
Diamond J, Mellanby J (1971) The effect of tetanus toxin in the goldfish. J Physiol (Lond) 215:727–741
Dreyer F, Schmitt A (1981) Different effects of botulinum A toxin and tetanus toxin on the transmitter releasing process at the mammalian neuromuscular junction. Neurosci Letters 26:307–311
Duchen LW, Tonge DA (1973) The effects of tetanus toxin on neuromuscular transmission and on the morphology of motor end-plates in slow and fast skeletal muscle of the mouse. J Physiol (Lond) 228:157–172
Gundersen CB (1980) The effects of botulinum toxin on the synthesis, storage and release of acetylcholine. Prog Neurobiol (Oxf) 14:99–199
Gundersen CB, Katz B, Miledi R (1982) The antagonism between botulinum toxin and calcium in motor nerve terminals. Proc R Soc Lond B 216:369–376
Habermann E, Dreyer F, Bigalke H (1980) Tetanus toxin blocks the neuromuscular transmission in vitro like botulinum A toxin. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol 311:33–40
Harris AJ, Miledi R (1971) The effect of type D botulinum toxin on frog neuromuscular junction. J Physiol (Lond) 217:497–515
Howard BD, Gundersen CB (1980) Effects and mechanisms of polypeptide neurotoxins that act presynaptically. Ann Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 20:307–336
Kaeser HE, Saner A (1969) Tetanus toxin, a neuromuscular blocking agent. Nature 223:842
Kao I, Drachman DB, Price DL (1976) Botulinum toxin: Mechanism of presynaptic blockade. Science NY 193:1256–1258
Kriebel ME, Llados F, Matteson DR (1976) Spontaneous subminiature end-plate potentials in mouse diaphragm muscle: Evidence for synchronous release. J Physiol (Lond) 262:553–581
Kryzhanovsky GN (1973) The mechanism of action of tetanus toxin: Effect on synaptic processes and some particular features of toxin binding by the nervous tissue. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol 276:247–270
Kryzhanovsky GN (1981) Pathophysiology. In: Veronesi R (ed) Tetanus, important new concepts. Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam Oxford, pp 109–182
Llados F, Matteson DR, Kriebel ME (1980) β-Bungarotoxin preferentially blocks one class of miniature endplate potentials. Brain Res 192:598–602
Mellanby J, Green J (1981) How does tetanus toxin act? Neuroscience 6:281–300
Mellanby J, Thompson PA (1972) The effect of tetanus toxin at the neuromuscular junction in the goldfish. J Physiol (Lond) 224:407–419
Schmitt A, Dreyer F, John Chr (1981) At least three sequential steps are involved in the tetanus toxin-induced block of neuromuscular transmission. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol 317:326–330
Sellin LC (1981) The action of botulinum toxin at the neuromuscular junction. Medical Biol 59:11–20
Simpson LL (1981) The origin, structure and pharmacological activity of botulinum toxin. Pharmacol Rev 33:155–188
Spitzer N (1972) Miniature end-plate potentials at mammalian neuromuscular junctions poisoned by botulinum toxin. Nature 237:26–27
Sugiyama H (1980) Clostridium botulinum neurotoxin. Microbiol Rev 44:419–448
Wellhöner HH (1982) Tetanus toxin. Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol 93:1–68
Wendon LMB (1980) On the action of tetanus toxin on the rat neuromuscular junction. J Physiol (Lond) 300:23P
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dreyer, F., Schmitt, A. Transmitter release in tetanus and botulinum A toxin-poisoned mammalian motor endplates and its dependence on nerve stimulation and temperature. Pflugers Arch. 399, 228–234 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00656720
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00656720