Skip to main content
Log in

Perceptual effects of scene context on object identification

  • Published:
Psychological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In a number of studies the context provided by a real-world scene has been claimed to have a mandatory, perceptual effect on the identification of individual objects in such a scene. This claim has provided a basis for challenging widely accepted data-driven models of visual perception in order to advocate alternative models with an outspoken top-down character. The present paper offers a review of the evidence to demonstrate that the observed scene-context effects may be the product of post-perceptual and task-dependent guessing strategies. A new research paradigm providing an on-line measure of genuine perceptual effects of context on object identification is proposed. First-fixation durations for objects incidentally fixated during the free exploration of real-world scenes are shown to increase when the objects are improbable in the scene or violate certain aspects of their typical spatial appearance in it. These effects of contextual violations are shown to emerge only at later stages of scene exploration, contrary to the notion of schema-driven scene perception effective from the very first scene fixation. In addition, evidence is reported in support of the existence of a facilitatory component in scene-context effects. This is taken to indicate that the context directly affects the ease of perceptual object processing and does not merely serve as a framework for checking the plausibility of the output of perceptual processes. Finally, our findings are situated against other contrasting results. Some future research questions are highlighted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antes, J. R. (1974). The time course of picture viewing.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 3, 62–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antes, J. R., Mann, S. M., & Penland, J. G. (1981).Local precedence in picture naming: The importance of obligatory objects. Paper presented at the 1981 meeting of the Psychonomic Society.

  • Antes, J. R., & Penland, J. G. (1981). Picture context effects on eye movement patterns. In D. F.Fischer, R. A.Monty, & J. W.Senders (Eds.),Eye movements: Cognition and visual perception (pp. 157–170). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antes, J. R., Penland, J. G., & Metzger, R. L. (1981). Processing global information in briefly presented pictures.Psychological Research, 43, 277- 292.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Antes, J. R., Singsaas, P. A., & Metzger, R. L. (1978). Components of pictorial informativeness.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 47, 459–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biederman, I. (1981). On the semantics of a glance at a scene. In M. Kubovy & J. R.Pomerantz (Eds.),Perceptual Organization. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding.Psychological Review, 94, 115–147.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Biederman, I. (1988). Aspects and extensions of a theory of human image understanding. In Z. W.Pylyshyn (Ed.),Computational processes in human vision: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 370–428). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biederman, I., Mezzanotte, R. J., & Rabinowitz, J. C. (1982). Scene perception: Detecting and judging objects undergoing relational violations.Cognitive Psychology, 14, 143–177.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boyce, S. J., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (1989). Effects of background information on object identification.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human. Perception and Performance, 15, 556–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, T. H., McCauley, C., Sperber, R. D., & Parmelee, C. M. (1982). Words, pictures and priming: On semantic activation, conscious identification, and the automaticity of information processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 757–777.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cliff, N. (1987).Analyzing multivariate data. Orlando, FL: Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, A. (1979). Framing pictures: The role of knowledge in automatized encoding and memory for gist.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 316–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, A. R., & Riseman, E. M. (1978). VISIONS: A computer system for interpreting scenes. In A.Hanson & E.Riseman (Eds.),Computer vision systems (pp. 303–333). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, J. M., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (1987). Effects of foveal priming and extrafoveal preview on object identification.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 449–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, J. M., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (1989). Covert visual attention and extrafoveal information use during object identification.Perception & Psychophysics, 45, 196–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huttenlocher, J., & Kubicek, L. F. (1983). The source of relatedness effects on naming latency.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 9, 486–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inhoff, A. W. (1984). Two stages of word processing during eye fixations in the reading of prose.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 612–624.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, R. E. (1982).Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klatsky, G. J., Teitelbaum, R. C., Mezzanotte, R. J., & Biederman, I. (1981). Mandatory processing of the background in the detection of objects in scenes.Proceedings of the Human Factors Society, 25, 272–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroll, J. F., & Potter, M. C. (1984). Recognizing words, pictures and concepts: A comparison of lexical, object and reality decisions.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 39–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locher, P. J., & Nodine, C. F. (1987). Symmetry catches the eye. In J. K.O'Regan & A.Levy-Schoen (Eds.),Eye Movements: From Physiology to Cognition (pp. 353 - 361) North-Holland: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loftus, G. R. (1983). Eye fixations on text and scenes. In K. Rayner (Ed.),Eye movements in reading (pp. 359 - 376). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loftus, G. R., & Mackworth, N. H. (1978). Cognitive determinants of fixation location during picture viewing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 565 - 572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loftus, G. R., Nelson, W. W., & Kallman, H. J. (1983). Differential acquisition rates for different types of information from pictures.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35A, 187 -198.

    Google Scholar 

  • McArthur, D. J. (1982). Computer vision and perceptual psychology.Psychological Bulletin, 92, 283 - 309.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marr, D. (1978). Representing visual information: A computational approach. In A. R.Hanson & E. M. Riseman (Eds.),Computer vision systems (pp. 61 - 80). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marr, D. (1982).Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. San Francisco: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metzger, R. L., Antes, J. R. (1983). The nature of processing early in picture perception.Psychological Research, 45, 267 - 274.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nodine, C. E., Carmody, D. P., & Kundel, H. L. (1978). Searching for NINA. In J. W.Senders, D. F.Fisher, & R. A.Monty (Eds.),Eye movements and the higher psychological functions (pp. 241 - 258). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, S. E. (1975). Visual perception and world knowledge: Notes on a model of sensory-cognitive interaction. In D. A.Norman & D. E.Rumelhart (Eds.),Explorations in cognition (pp. 279 - 307). San Francisco: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1987). Eye movements in reading: A tutorial review. In M. Coltheart (Ed.),Attention and Performance XII, (pp. 327 - 362). London: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riseman, E. M., & Hanson, A. R. (1987). A methodology for the development of general knowledge-based vision systems. In M. Arbib & A.Hanson (Eds.),Vision, brain and cooperative computation (pp. 285 - 328). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schank, R. (1982).Dynamic memory. A theory of reminding and learning in computers and people. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verfaillie, K., & Wagemans, J. (1987).Constraints in perception and cognition of objects, scenes and events. Psychological Report, 72, Laboratory of Experimental Psychology, University of Leuven, Belgium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, L. R., & Sheena, D. (1975). Survey of eye movement recording methods.Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 7, 397–429.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

De Graef, P., Christiaens, D. & d'Ydewalle, G. Perceptual effects of scene context on object identification. Psychol. Res 52, 317–329 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00868064

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00868064

Keywords

Navigation