Skip to main content
Log in

Ocular artifacts in recording EEGs and event-related potentials II: Source dipoles and source components

  • Published:
Brain Topography Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The source dipoles for blinks point radially whereas the source dipoles for saccades point tangentially, in the direction of the eye movement. This indicates that blink potentials are not generated by eye movements but by the eyelid sliding down over the positively charged cornea. Dipole source dipole analysis shows that the “rider artifact” at the onset of upward and lateral saccades is caused by the eyelid as it lags a little behind the eyes at the beginning of the movement. Dipole source analysis allows both the EEG and the EOG to be modeled simultaneously and EOG generators to be distinguished from nearby EEG generators. Ocular source components can be calculated from a principal component analysis of EEG and EOG recordings during blinks and saccades. The effectiveness of propagation factors, source dipoles and source components in removing ocular artifacts from EEG samples was assessed. The most effective correction procedure uses source components.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barlow, J.S. and Rémond, A. Eye movement artifact nulling in EEGs by multichannel on-line EOG subtraction. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1981: 418–423.

  • Barry, W. and Jones G.M. Influence of eye lid movement upon electro-oculographic recording of vertical eye movements. Aerosp. Med., 1965, 36: 855–858.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, W. and Fuchs, A.F. Lid-eye coordination during vertical gaze changes in man and monkey. J. Neurophysiol., 1988, 60: 1227–1252.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berg, P. and Scherg, M. Dipole models of eye movements and blinks Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1991a, 79: 36–44.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berg, P. and Scherg, M. Dipole modeling of eye activity and its application to the removal of eye artifacts from the EEG and MEG. Clin. Phys. Physiol. Meas., 1991b; 12 (Supplement A): 49–54.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brunia, C.H.M., Mocks, J., van den Berg-Lenssen, M.M.C. et al. Correcting ocular artifacts in the EEG: A comparison of several methods. J. Psychophysiol., 1989, 3: 1–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collewijn, H., Van Der Steen, J. and Steinman, R.M. Human eye movements associated with blinks and prolonged eyelid closure. J. Neurophysiol., 1985, 54: 11–27.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elbert, T., Lutzenberger, W., Rockstroh, B. and Birbaumer, N. Removal of the ocular artifacts from the EEG—A biophysical approach to the EOG. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1985, 60: 455–463.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Evinger, M.D., Shaw, C.K., Manning, K.A. and Baker, R. Blinking and associated eye movement in humans, guinea pigs and rabbits. J. Neurophysiol., 1984, 52: 323–38.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gasser, T., Sroka, L. and Mocks, J. The correction of EOG artifacts by frequency dependent and frequency independent methods. Psychophysiology, 1986, 23: 704–712.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gratton, G., Coles, M.G.H. and Donchin, E. A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1983, 55: 468–484.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Häkkinen, V., Hirvonen, K., Hasan, J., Kataja, M., Värri, A., Loula, P. and Eskola, H. Effects of small differences in electrode positions on EOG signals. Application to vigilance studies. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1993, 86: 294–300.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hector, M.L. EEG recording. Butterworths, London, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillyard, S.A. and Galambos, R. Eye movement artifact in the CNV. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1970, 28: 173–182.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ifeachor, E.C., Jervis, B.W., Allen, E.M., Moris, E.L., Wright, D.E. and Hudson, N.R. Investigation and comparison of some models for removing ocular artifacts from EEG signals. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput., 1988, 26: 584–590; 591–598.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jervis, B.W., Nichols, M.J., Allen, E.M., Hudson, N.R. and Johnson, T.E. The assessment of two methods for removing eye movement artifact from the EEG. Electroncephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1985, 61: 444–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jervis, B.W., Ifeachor, E.C. and Allen, E.M. The removal of ocular artifacts from the electroencephalogram: a review. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput., 1988, 26: 2–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCallum, W.C. and Walter, W.G. The effects of attention and distraction on the contingent negative variation in normal and neurotic subjects. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1968, 25: 319–329.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Möcks, J. and Verlenger R. Multivariate methods in biosignal analysis: application of principal component analysis to event-related potentials. In: R. Weitkunat (Ed.), Digital Biosignal Processing. Techniques in the Behavioral and Neural Sciences. Vol 5. Amsterdam, Elsevier, 1991: 399–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunez, P.L. and Katznelson, R.D. Electric fields of the brain: the neurophysics of EEG Oxford, New York, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherg, M. Fundamentals of dipole source analysis. In: M. Hoke, F. Grandori and G.L. Romani (Eds.), Advances in Audiology, Vol 6. Auditory Evoked Magnetic Fields and Potentials. Basel, Karger, 1990: 40–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherg, M. and Von Cramon, D. Dipole source potentials of the auditory cortex in normal subjects and patients with temporal lobe lesions. In: F. Grandori, M. Hoke and G.L. Romani (Eds.), Advances in Audiology, Vol 6. Auditory Evoked Magnetic Fields and Potentials. Basel, Karger, 1990: 165–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherg, M. and Picton, T.W. Separation and identification of event-related potential components by brain electric source analysis. In: C.H.M. Brunia, G. Mulder and M.N. Verbaten (Eds.), Event-Related Potentials of the Brain. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., Suppl. 42, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1991: 24–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherg, M. Functional imaging and localization of electromagnetic brain activity. Brain Topography, 1992, 5: 103–111.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Semlitsch, H.V., Anderer, P., Schuster, P. and Presslich, O. A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifacts, applied to the P300 ERP. Psychophysiology, 1986, 23: 965–703.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitton, J.L., Lue, F. and Moldofsky, H. A spectral method for removing eye movement artifacts from the EEG. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1978, 44: 735–741.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported by a grant from the Medical Research Council of Canada (MA5465) and a NATO collaborative research grant (0330/88). The programming for the analysis of ocular source components was supported by a grant from the James S. McDonnell Foundation (Grant 90-174, principal investigator Edgar Zurif). Dick Mowrey provided programming assistance.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lins, O.G., Picton, T.W., Berg, P. et al. Ocular artifacts in recording EEGs and event-related potentials II: Source dipoles and source components. Brain Topogr 6, 65–78 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01234128

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01234128

Key words

Navigation