Skip to main content
Log in

Differential olfactory perception of enantiomeric compounds by blind subterranean mole rats (Spalax ehrenbergi)

  • Research Articles
  • Published:
Experientia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The behavior of mole rats (Spalax ehrenbergi) near pairs of enantiomeric compounds was examined in 901 two-choice experimental tests. Positioning of the nest and food store and the preferred location of the tested animal were used to assess attraction or aversion to the tested odorants. The results indicated that mole rats respond differentially to odors of stereoisomers (enantiomers of carvone, citronellol, and fechone). They responded to one enantiomer of each tested pair but were indifferent to or did not smell the other. Both sexes were attracted to the odor of R-(−)-carvone and repelled by the odor of (+)-citronellol. Females were attracted to the odor of (−)-fenchone while males had no preference. By contrast, all animals were indifferent to or did not smell the odor of S-(+)-carvone, (−)-citronellol, and (+)-fenchone. Further research to distinguish between these alternatives (indifference vs hyposmia/anosmia) is suggested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  1. Burda, H., Bruns, V., and Müller, M., in: Evolution of Subterranean Mammals at the Organismal and Molecular Levels. Eds. E. Nevo and O. A. Reig. Wiley-Liss, New York 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nevo, E., Evol. Biol.25 (1991) 1.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nevo, E., Mammalia25 (1961) 127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Nevo, E., Heth, G., and Beiles, A., J. Genet.65 (1986) 65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Heth, G., J. Zool., Lond.217 (1989) 39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Heth, G., Golenberg, E. M., and Nevo, E., Oecologia79 (1989) 496.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Haim, A., Heth, G., Pratt, H., and Nevo, E., J. exp. Biol.107 (1983) 59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nevo, E., Behaviour114 (1990) 249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nevo, E., Heth, G., and Pratt, H., Proc. natl Acad. Sci. USA88 (1991) 1256.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Nevo, E., and Heth, G., Experientia32 (1976) 1509.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nevo, E., Bodmer, M., and Heth, G., Experientia32 (1976) 1511.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Menzies, R. A., Heth, G., Ikan, R., Weinstein, V., and Nevo, E., Physiol. Behav., in press.

  13. Heth, G., Yamazaki, K., Beauchamp, G., and Nevo, E., submitted.

  14. Menzies, R. A., Heth, G., and Nevo, E., submitted.

  15. Kafka, W. K., Ohloff, G., Schneider, D., and Vareschi, E., J. comp. Physiol.87 (1973) 277.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Riley, R. G., Silverstein, R. M., and Moser, J. C., Science183 (1974) 760.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lensky, Y., and Blum, M. S., Life Sci.14 (1974) 2045.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Payne, T. L., Richerson, J. V., Dickens, J. C., West, J. R., Mori, K., Berisford, C. W., Hedden, R. L., Vite, J. P. and Blum, M. S., J. chem. Ecol.8 (1982) 873.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Winston, M. L., Slessor, K. N., Smirle, M. J., and Kardil, A. A., J. chem. Ecol.8 (1982) 1283.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Müller-Schwarze, D., Ravid, U., Claesson, A., Singer, A. G., Silverstein, R. M., Müller-Schwarze, C., Volkman, N. J., Zemanek, K. F., and Butler, R. G., J. chem. Ecol.4 (1978) 247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Leitereg, T. J., Guadagni, D. G., Harris, J., Mon, T. R., and Teranishi, R., J. Agric. Food Chem.19 (1971) 785.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Russell, G. F., and Hills, J. I., Science172 (1971) 1044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Friedman, L., and Miller, J. G., Science172 (1971) 1046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Nishida, Y. R., Acree, T. E., and Fukami, H., Agric. Biol. Chem.49 (1985) 769.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Pike, L. M., Enns, M. P., and Hornung, D. E., Chem. Sens.13 (1988) 307.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Cowart, B. J., Chem. Sens.15 (1990) 562.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Siegel, S., Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. McGraw-Hill, New York 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lancet, D., A. Rev. Neurosci.9 (1986) 329.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Reed, R. R., Cell60 (1990) 1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Buck, L., and Axel, R., Cell65 (1991) 175.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ohloff, G., Vial, C., Wolf, H. R., Job, K., Jegou, E., Polonsky, J., and Lederer, E., Helv. chim. Acta63 (1980) 1932.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Ohloff, G., Experientia42 (1986) 271.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Jones, F. N. and Elliot, D., Chem. Sens. Flavour1 (1975) 317.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Theimer, E. T., Yoshida, T., and Kliber, E. M., J. Agric. Food Chem.25 (1977) 1168.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heth, G., Nevo, E., Ikan, R. et al. Differential olfactory perception of enantiomeric compounds by blind subterranean mole rats (Spalax ehrenbergi). Experientia 48, 897–902 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02118430

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02118430

Key words

Navigation