Skip to main content
Log in

Reversal of stress-induced anhedonia by the atypical antidepressants, fluoxetine and maprotiline

  • Original Investigations
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Chronic exposure to mild unpredictable stress has previously been found to depress the consumption of palatable sweet solutions. In the present study this effect was reversed by chronic (9 weeks) treatment with the atypical antidepressants, fluoxetine and maprotiline (5 mg/kg/day); the non-antidepressant chlordiazepoxide was ineffective. Stressed animals were also subsensitive to food reward in the place conditioning procedure; however, fluoxetine and maprotiline treated animals showed normal place preference conditioning. Acute pretreatment with raclopride (100 µg/kg) selectively reversed the recovery of sucrose drinking in antidepressant-treated stressed animals. These results extend previous reports of the efficacy of tricyclic antidepressants in this paradigm, and support the hypothesis of a dopaminergic mechanism of antidepressant action.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychiatric Association (1987) DSM IIIR- Diagnostic and statistical manual of psychiatric disorders, 3rd edn (revised). American Psychiatric Association, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Anisman H Zacharko RM (1982) Depression: the predisposing influence of stress. Behav Brain Sci 5:89–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnt J, Hytell J Overo KF (1984) Prolonged treatment with the specific 5-HT uptake inhibitor citalopram: effect on dopaminergic and serotonergic functions. Pol J Pharm Pharmacol 36:221–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Asberg M, Eriksson B, Martensson B, Traskman-Bendz L, Wagner A (1986) Therapeutic effects of serotonin uptake inhibitors in depression. J Clin Psychiatry 47 Suppl 4:23–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozarth MA (ed) (1987) Methods of assessing the reinforcing properties of abused drugs. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bremner JD (1986) Fluoxetine in depressed patients: a comparison with imipramine. J Clin Psychiatry 45:414–419

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown GW, Harris T (eds) (1988) Life events and illness. Guilford Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr GD, Fibiger HC, Phillips AG (1989) Conditioned place preference as a measure of drug reward. In: Liebman JM, Cooper SJ (eds) The neuropharmacological basis of reward. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 264–319

    Google Scholar 

  • De Paulis T, Kumar Y, Johansson L, Ramsby L, Hall H, Sallemark M, Angeby-Moller K, Ogren S-O (1986) Potential neuroleptic agents 4: chemistry, behavioral pharmacology, and inhibition of (3H)-spiperone binding of 3,5-disubstituted N-((1-ethyl-2-pyrrolidinyl)methyl)-6-methoxy-salicylates. J Med Chem 29:61–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett J, Clark DC, Scheftner WA, Gibbons RD (1983) Assessing anhedonia in psychiatric patients: the pleasure scale. Arch Gen Psychiatry 40:79–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanner AD, Coyne JC, Schaefer C, Lazarus RS (1981) Comparison of two modes of stress measurement: Daily hassles and uplifts versus major life events. J Behav 4:1–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein DF (1974) Endogenomorphic depression: a conceptual and terminological revision. Arch Gen Psychiatry 31:447–454

    Google Scholar 

  • Klimek V, Maj J (1989) Repeated administration of antidepressant drugs enhanced agonist affinity for mesolimbic D-2 receptors. J Pharm Pharmacol 41:555–558

    Google Scholar 

  • Klimek V, Nielsen M (1987) Chronic treatment with antidepressants decreases the number of [3H]SCH 23390 binding sites in the rat striatum and limbic system. Eur J Pharmacol 139:163–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd C (1980) Life events and depressive disorders reviewed. 2. Events as precipitating factors. Arch Gen Psychiatry 37:541–548

    Google Scholar 

  • Maitre L, Waldmeier PC, Greengrass PM, Jaeckel J, Sedlucek, S, Celina-Stula A (1975) Maprotiline—its position as an antidepressant in the light of recent neuropharmacological and neurobiochemical findings. J Int Med Res 3 [Suppl 2]:2–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Maj J (1988) Repeated treatment with antidepressant drugs and functional changes of catecholajminergic receptors at the behavioural level. In: Belmaker RH, Sandler M, Dahlstrom A (eds) Progress in catecholamine research: part C, clinical aspects. Liss, New York, pp 255–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Maj J, Wedzony K (1985) Repeated treatment with imipramine or amitriptyline increases the locomotor response of rats to (+)-amphetamine given into the nucleus accumbens. J Pharm Pharmacol 37:362–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Maj J, Wedzony K (1988) The influence of oxaprotaline enantiomers given repeatedly on the behavioural effects ofd-amphetamine and dopamine injected into the nucleus accumbens. Eur J Pharmacol 145:97–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Maj J, Rogoz Z, Skuza G, Sowinska H (1984a) Repeated treatment with antidepressant drugs potentiates the locomotor response to (+)-amphetamine. J Pharm Pharmacol 36:127–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Maj J, Rogoz Z, Skuza G, Sowinska H (1984b) Repeated treatment with antidepressant drugs increases the behavioural response to apomorphine. J Neural Transm 60:273–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Maj J, Wedzony K, Klimek V (1987) Desipramine given repeatedly enhances behavioural effects of dopamine andd-amphetamine injected into the nucleus accumbens. Eur J Pharmacol 140:179–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin-Iverson M, Leclere JF, Fibiger HC (1983) Cholinergic-dopaminergic interactions and the mechanisms of action of antidepressants. Eur J Pharmacol 94:193–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery SA (1980) Maprotiline, nomifensine, mianserin, zimelidine: a review of antidepressant efficacy in in-patients. Neuropharmacology 19:1185–1190

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreau J-L, Jenck F, Martin JR, Mortas P, Haefely WE (1992) Antidepressant treatment prevents chronic unpredictable mild stress-induced anhedonia as assessed by ventral tegmental self-stimulation behavior in rats. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2:43–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muscat R, Towell A, Willner P (1988) Changes in dopamine autoreceptor sensitivity in an animal model of depression. Psychopharmacology 94:545–550

    Google Scholar 

  • Muscat R, Sampson D, Willner P (1990) Dopaminergic mechanism of imipramine action in an animal model of depression. Biol Psychiatry 28:223–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Muscat R, Willner P (1992) Suppression of sucrose drinking by chronic mild stress: a methodological analysis, Neurosci Biobehav Rev (in press).

  • Nelson JC, Charney DS (1981) The symptoms of major depression. Am J Psychiatry 138:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Papp M, Willner P, Muscat R (1991) An animal model of anhedonia. Attenuation of sucrose consumption and place preference conditioning by chronic unpredictable mild stress. Psychopharmacology 104:255–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Papp M, Lappas S, Muscat R, Willner P (1992) Attenuation of place preference conditioning but not place aversion conditioning by chronic mild stress. J Psychopharmacol (in press)

  • Plaznik A, Kostowski W (1987) The effects of antidepressants and electroconvulsive shocks on the function of the mesolimbic dopamine system: a behavioural study. Eur J Pharmacol 135:389–396

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson D, Muscat R, Willner P (1991) Reversal of antidepressant action by dopamine antagonists in an animal model of depression. Psychopharmacology 104:491–495

    Google Scholar 

  • Willner P, Montgomery A (1981) Behavioural changes during withdrawal from the tricyclic antidepressant desmethylimipramine (DMI). I. Interactions with amphetamine. Psychopharmacology 75:54–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Willner P, Towell A, Sampson D, Muscat R, Sophokleous S (1987) Reduction of sucrose preference by chronic mild stress and its restoration by a tricyclic antidepressant. Psychopharmacology 93:358–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Willner P, Sampson D, Papp M, Phillips G, Muscat R (1991) Animal models of anhedonia. In. Simon, P, Soubrie P, Widlocher D (eds) Animal models of psychiatric disorders, vol 3. Karger, Basel, pp 71–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Winer BJ (1971) Statistical principles in experimental design. McGraw Hill, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Zacharko RM, Anisman H (1991) Stressor-provoked alterations of intracranial self-stimulation in the mesocortiolimbic dopamine system: an animal model of depression. In: Willner P, Scheel-Kruger J (eds) The mesolimbic dopamine system, from motivation to action. Wiley, Chichester, pp 411–442

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Muscat, R., Papp, M. & Willner, P. Reversal of stress-induced anhedonia by the atypical antidepressants, fluoxetine and maprotiline. Psychopharmacology 109, 433–438 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02247719

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02247719

Key words

Navigation