Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Opposite environmental regulation of heroin and amphetamine self-administration in the rat

  • Original Investigation
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rationale

The circumstances of drug taking are thought to play a role in drug abuse but the evidence of it is anecdotal. Previous studies have shown that the intravenous self-administration of cocaine is facilitated in rats non-residing in the test chambers relative to rats that live in the test chambers at all times. We investigated here whether environmental context could exert its modulatory influence on heroin and amphetamine self-administration as well.

Materials and methods

Independent groups of rats were given the possibility to self-administer different doses of heroin or amphetamine (12.5, 25.0, or 50.0 μg/kg). Some animals were housed in the self-administration chambers (resident groups) whereas other rats were transported to the self-administration chambers only for the test sessions (non-resident groups).

Results

Amphetamine-reinforcing effects were more pronounced in non-resident rats than in resident rats, as previously reported for cocaine. Quite unexpectedly, the opposite was found for heroin. Because of this surprising dissociation, some of the rats trained to self-administer amphetamine were later given the opportunity to self-administer heroin. Also in this case, resident rats took more heroin than non-resident rats.

Conclusions

These findings suggest an unforeseen dissociation between opioid and psychostimulant reward and demonstrate that even in the laboratory rat some contexts are associated with the propensity to self-administer more opioid than psychostimulant drugs and vice versa, thus indicating that drug taking is influenced not only by economical or cultural factors but also can be modulated at a much more basic level by the setting in which drugs are experienced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anthony JC, Chen YC (2004) Epidemiology of drug dependence. In: Galanter M, Kleber HD (eds) Textbook of substance abuse treatment. American Psychiatric, Washington, DC, pp 55–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Badiani A, Anagnostaras SG, Robinson TE (1995a) The development of sensitization to the psychomotor stimulant effects of amphetamine is enhanced in a novel environment. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 117:443–452

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Badiani A, Browman KE, Robinson TE (1995b) Influence of novel versus home environments on sensitization to the psychomotor stimulant effects of cocaine and amphetamine. Brain Res 674:291–298

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Badiani A, Morano I, Akil H, Robinson TE (1995c) Circulating adrenal hormones are not necessary for the development of sensitization to the psychomotor activating effects of amphetamine. Brain Res 673:13–24

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Badiani A, Oates MM, Day HEW, Watson SJ, Akil H, Robinson TE (1998) Amphetamine-induced behavior, dopamine release and c-fos mRNA expression: modulation by environmental novelty. J Neurosci 18:10579–10593

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Badiani A, Oates MM, Day HEW, Watson SJ, Akil H, Robinson TE (1999) Environmental modulation of amphetamine-induced c-fos expression in D1 versus D2 striatal neurons. Behav Brain Res 103:203–209

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Badiani A, Oates MM, Robinson TE (2000a) Modulation of morphine sensitization in the rat by contextual stimuli. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 151:273–282

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Badiani A, Oates MM, Fraioli S, Browman KE, Ostrander MM, Xue CJ et al (2000b) Environmental modulation of the response to amphetamine: dissociation between changes in behavior and changes in dopamine and glutamate overflow in the rat striatal complex. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 151:166–174

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Browman KE, Badiani A, Robinson TE (1998) The influence of environment on the induction of sensitization to the psychomotor activating effects of intravenous cocaine in rats is dose-dependent. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 137:90–98

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Caprioli D, Paolone G, Celentano M, Testa A, Nencini P, Badiani A (2007a) Environmental modulation of cocaine self-administration in the rat. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 192:397–406

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Caprioli D, Celentano M, Paolone G, Badiani A (2007b) Modeling the role of environment in addiction. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 31:1639–1653

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crombag HS, Badiani A, Robinson TE (1996) Signalled versus unsignalled intravenous amphetamine: large differences in the acute psychomotor response and sensitization. Brain Res 722:227–231

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Devine DP, Leone P, Pocock D, Wise RA (1993) Differential involvement of ventral tegmental mu, delta and kappa opioid receptors in modulation of basal mesolimbic dopamine release: in vivo microdialysis studies. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 266:1236–1246

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Di Chiara G, Imperato A (1988) Drugs abused by humans preferentially increase synaptic dopamine concentrations in the mesolimbic system of freely moving rats. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:5274–5278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Falk JL, Feingold DA (1987) Environmental and cultural factors in the behavioral actions of drugs. In: Meltzer HY (ed) Psychopharmacology: the third generation of progress. Raven, New York, pp 1503–1510

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson SM, Thomas MJ, Robinson TE (2004) Morphine-induced c-fos mRNA expression in striatofugal circuits: modulation by dose, environmental context, and drug history. Neuropsychopharmacology 29:1664–1674

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman SB, Ader R (1967) Adrenocortical response to novelty and noxious stimulation. Neuroendocrinology 2:209–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gysling K, Wang RY (1983) Morphine-induced activation of A10 dopamine neurons in the rat. Brain Res 277:119–127

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hennessy JW, Levin R, Levine S (1977) Influence of experiential factors and gonadal hormones on pituitary–adrenal response of the mouse to novelty and electric shock. J Comp Physiol Psychol 91:770–777

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hinson RE, Poulous CX (1981) Sensitization to the behavioral effects of cocaine: modification by Pavlovian conditioning. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 15:559–562

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hope BT, Simmons DE, Mitchell TB, Kreuter JD, Mattson BJ (2006) Cocaine-induced locomotor activity and Fos expression in nucleus accumbens are sensitized for 6 months after repeated cocaine administration outside the home cage. Eur J Neurosci 24:867–875

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ikemoto S (2007) Dopamine reward circuitry: two projection systems from the ventral midbrain to the nucleus accumbens-olfactory tubercle complex. Brain Res Rev 56:27–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Johanson CE, Fischman MW (1989) The pharmacology of cocaine related to its abuse. Pharmacol Rev 41:3–52

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson SW, North RA (1992) Opioids excite dopamine neurons by hyperpolarization of local interneurons. J Neurosci 12:483–488

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kuczenski R, Segal DS (1994) Neurochemistry of amphetamine. In: Cho AK, Segal DS (eds) Amphetamine and its analogs: psychopharmacology, toxicology and abuse. Academic, San Diego, pp 81–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews RT, German DC (1984) Electrophysiological evidence for excitation of rat ventral tegmental area dopamine neurons by morphine. Neuroscience 11:617–625

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nestler EJ (2005) Historical review: molecular and cellular mechanisms of opiate and cocaine addiction. Trends Pharmacol Sci 25:210–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrander MM, Badiani A, Day HE, Norton CS, Watson SJ, Akil H, Robinson TE (2003) Environmental context and drug history modulate amphetamine-induced c-fos mRNA expression in the basal ganglia, central extended amygdala, and associated limbic forebrain. Neuroscience 120:551–571

    Google Scholar 

  • Paolone G, Burdino R, Badiani A (2003) Dissociation in the modulatory effects of environmental novelty on the locomotor, analgesic, and eating response to acute and repeated morphine in the rat. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 166:146–155

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paolone G, Palopoli M, Marrone MC, Nencini P, Badiani A (2004) Environmental modulation of the interoceptive effects of amphetamine in the rat. Behav Brain Res 152:149–155

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paolone G, Conversi D, Caprioli D, Del Bianco P, Nencini P, Cabib S et al (2007) Modulatory effect of environmental context and drug history on heroin-induced psychomotor activity and Fos protein expression in the rat brain. Neuropsychopharmacology 32:2611–2623

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Piazza PV, Le Moal M (1998) The role of stress in drug self-administration. Trends Pharmacol Sci 19:67–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson TE, Berridge KC (1993) The neural basis of drug craving: an incentive-sensitization theory of addiction. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 18:247–291

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tilson HA, Rech RH (1973) Conditioned drug effects and absence of tolerance to d-amphetamine induced motor activity. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1:149–153

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Trujillo KA, Zamora JJ, Warmoth KP (2008) Increased response to ketamine following treatment at long intervals: implications for intermittent use. Biol Psychiatry 63(2):178–183

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Uslaner J, Badiani A, Norton CS, Day HEW, Watson SJ, Akil H, Robinson TE (2001) Amphetamine and cocaine induce different patterns of c-fos mRNA expression in the striatum and subthalamic nucleus depending on environmental context. Eur J Neurosci 13:1977–1983

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vezina P, Stewart J (1984) Conditioning and place-specific sensitization of increases in activity induced by morphine in the VTA. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 20:925–934

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Gracy KN, Pickel VM (1999) Mu-opioid and NMDA-type glutamate receptors are often colocalized in spiny neurons within patches of the caudate–putamen nucleus. J Comp Neurol 412:132–146

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Westermeyer J (2004) Cross-cultural aspects of substance abuse. In: Galanter M, Kleber HD (eds) Textbook of substance abuse treatment. American Psychiatric, Washington, DC, pp 55–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise RA (2004) Dopamine, learning and motivation. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 5:483–494

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wise RA, Bozarth MA (1987) A psychomotor stimulant theory of addiction. Psychol Rev 94:469–492

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zinberg NE (1984) Drug, set, and setting: the basis for controlled intoxicant use. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Jane Stewart and Yavin Shaham for their helpful comments on previous versions of this manuscript. This work was supported by grants from the University of Rome Sapienza (Fondi di Ateneo 2006, C26A06LHXL, and Fondi di Facoltà 2006, C26F06Y9LL) and from the Italian Ministry for University and Research (PRIN, 2005050334_004).

Financial disclosure

The authors of the present manuscript do not have any conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, including direct or indirect financial or personal relationships, interests, and affiliations relevant to the subject matter of the manuscript, that have occurred in the past or that are expected in the foreseeable future. This disclosure includes, but is not limited to, grants or funding, employment, affiliations, patents (in preparation, filed, or granted), inventions, honoraria, consultancies, royalties, stock options/ownership, or expert testimony.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aldo Badiani.

Additional information

Daniele Caprioli and Michele Celentano equally contributed to the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Caprioli, D., Celentano, M., Paolone, G. et al. Opposite environmental regulation of heroin and amphetamine self-administration in the rat. Psychopharmacology 198, 395–404 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-008-1154-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-008-1154-3

Keywords

Navigation