Skip to main content
Log in

Ocular scanning and perceptual size distortion in hemispatial neglect: effects of prism adaptation and sequential stimulus presentation

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

When asked to compare two lateralized shapes for horizontal size, neglect patients often indicate the left stimulus to be smaller. Gainotti and Tiacci (1971) hypothesized that this phenomenon might be related to a rightward bias in the patients' gaze. This study aimed to assess the relation between this size underestimation and oculomotor asymmetries. Eye movements were recorded while three neglect patients judged the horizontal extent of two rectangles. Two experimental manipulations were performed to increase the likelihood of symmetrical scanning of the stimulus display. The first manipulation entailed a sequential, rather than simultaneous presentation of the two rectangles. The second required adaptation to rightward displacing prisms, which is known to reduce many manifestations of neglect. All patients consistently underestimated the left rectangle, but the pattern of verbal responses and eye movements suggested different underlying causes. These include a distortion of space perception without ocular asymmetry, a failure to view the full leftward extent of the left stimulus, and a high-level response bias. Sequential presentation of the rectangles and prism adaptation reduced ocular asymmetries without affecting size underestimation. Overall, the results suggest that leftward size underestimation in neglect can arise for a number of different reasons. Incomplete leftward scanning may perhaps be sufficient to induce perceptual size distortion, but it is not a necessary prerequisite.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. There was a significant difference between sessions for G.M., with the amount of time fixating left of centre being less in session 1 as compared to the other two sessions, F (2,282)=5.37, p<.01.

References

  • Bartolomeo P (1997) The novelty effect in recovered hemineglect. Cortex 33:323–332

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barton JJS, Behrmann M, Black S (1998) Ocular search during line bisection. The effects of hemineglect and hemianopia. Brain 121:1117–1131

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bisiach E, Geminiani G, Berti A, Rusconi ML (1990) Perceptual and premotor factors of unilateral neglect. Neurology 40:1278–1281

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bisiach E, Pizzamiglio L, Nico D, Antonucci G (1996) Beyond unilateral neglect. Brain 119:851–857

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bisiach E, Ricci R, Lualdi M, Colombo MR (1998) Perceptual and response bias in unilateral neglect: two modified versions of the Milner landmark task. Brain Cogn 37:369–386

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown V, Walker R, Gray C, Findlay J (1999) Limb activation and the rehabilitation of unilateral neglect: evidence of task-specific effects. Neurocase 5:129–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coslett HB, Bowers D, Fitzpatrick E, Haws B, Heilman KM (1990) Directional hypokinesia and hemispatial inattention in neglect. Brain 113:475–486

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Doricchi F, Angelelli A (1999) Misrepresentation of horizontal space in left unilateral neglect. Role of hemianopia. Neurology 52:1845–1852

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Farnè A, Rossetti Y, Toniolo S, Làdavas E (2002) Ameliorating neglect with prism adaptation: visuo-manual vs. visuo-verbal measures. Neuropsychologia 40:718–729

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ferber S, Karnath HO (2001) Size perception in hemianopia and neglect. Brain 124:527–536

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frassinetti F, Angeli V, Meneghello F, Avanzi S, Ladavas E (2002) Long-lasting amelioration of visuospatial neglect by prism adaptation. Brain 125:608–623

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gainotti G, Tiacci C (1971) The relationships between disorders of visual perception and unilateral spatial neglect. Neuropsychologia 9:451–458

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gainotti G, Messerli P, Tissot R (1972) Qualitative analysis of unilateral spatial neglect in relation to laterality of cerebral lesions. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 35:545–550

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey M, Olk B, Muir K, Gilchrist ID (2002) Manual responses and saccades in chronic and recovered hemispatial neglect: a study using visual search. Neuropsychologia 40:705–717

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey M, Gilchrist ID, Olk B, Muir K (2003) Eye-movement patterns do not mediate size distortion effects in hemispatial neglect: looking without seeing. Neuropsychologia 41:1114–1121

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilman KM, Valenstein E (1979) Mechanisms underlying hemispatial neglect in man. Ann Neurol 5:166–170

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hornak J (1992) Ocular exploration in the dark by patients. Neuropsychologia 30:547–552

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Husain M, Mannan S, Hodgson T, Wojciulik E, Driver J, Kennard C (2001) Impaired spatial working memory across saccades contributes to abnormal search in parietal neglect. Brain 124:941–952

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Irving-Bell L, Small M, Cowey A (1999) A distortion of perceived space in patients with right-hemisphere lesions and visual hemineglect. Neuropsychologia 37:919–925

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ishiai S, Furukawa T, Tsukagoshi H (1987) Eye-fixation patterns in homonymous hemianopia and unilateral spatial neglect. Neuropsychologia 25:675–679

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ishiai S, Sugishita M, Mitani K, Ishizawa M (1992) Leftward search in left unilateral spatial neglect. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 55:40–44

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Karnath HO, Ferber S (1999) Is space representation distorted in neglect? Neuropsychologia 37:7–15

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Karnath HO, Fetter M (1995) Ocular space exploration in the dark and its relation to subjective and objective body orientation in neglect patients with parietal lesions. Neuropsychologia 33:371–377

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Karnath HO, Fetter M, Dichgans J (1996) Ocular exploration of space as a function of neck proprioceptive and vestibular input—observations in normal subjects and patients with spatial neglect after parietal lesions. Exp Brain Res 109:333–342

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kerkhoff G (2000) Multiple perceptual distortions and their modulation in leftsided visual neglect. Neuropsychologia 38:1073–1086

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kerkhoff G, Schindler I, Keller I, Marquardt C (1999) Visual background motion reduces size distortion in spatial neglect. Neuroreport 10:319–323

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mattingley JB, Bradshaw JL, Bradshaw JA, Nettleton NC (1994) Residual rightward attentional bias after apparent recovery from right hemisphere damage: implications for a multicomponent model of neglect. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 57:597–604

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McIntosh RD, Rossetti Y, Milner AD (2002) Prism adaptation improves chronic visual and haptic neglect: a single case study. Cortex 38:309–320

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Milner AD (1987) Animal models for the syndrome of spatial neglect. In: Jeannerod M (ed) Neurophysiological and neuropsychological aspects of spatial neglect. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 259–288

  • Milner AD, Harvey M (1995) Distortion of size perception in visuo-spatial neglect. Curr Biol 5:85–89

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Milner AD, Harvey M, Roberts RC, Forster SV (1993) Line bisection errors in visual neglect; misguided action or size distortion? Neuropsychologia 31:39–49

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Milner AD, Harvey M, Pritchard CL (1998) Visual size processing in spatial neglect. Exp Brain Res 123:192–200

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pisella L, Rode G, Farnè A, Boisson D, Rossetti Y (2002) Dissociated long lasting improvements of straight-ahead pointing and line bisection tasks in two hemineglect patients. Neuropsychologia 40:327–334

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard CL, Milner AD, Dijkerman HC, MacWalter RS (1997) Visuospatial neglect: veridical coding of size for grasping but not for perception. Neurocase 3:437–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riestra AR, Crucian GP, Burks DW, Womack KB, Heilman KM (2001) Extinction, working memory, and line bisection in spatial neglect. Neurology 57:147–149

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rode G, Rossetti Y, Li L, Boisson D (1998) Improvement of mental imagery after prism exposure in neglect: a case study. Behav Neurol 11:251–258

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rode G, Rossetti Y, Boisson D (2001) Prism adaptation improves representational neglect. Neuropsychologia 39:1250–1254

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rossetti Y, Rode G (2002) Reducing spatial neglect by visual and other sensory manipulations: non-cognitive (physiological) routes to the rehabilitation of a cognitive disorder. In: Karnath HO, Milner AD, Vallar G (eds) The cognitive and neural bases of spatial neglect. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 375–396

  • Rossetti Y, Rode G, Pisella L, Farnè A, Li L, Boisson D, Perenin MT (1998) Prism adaptation to a rightward optical deviation rehabilitates left hemispatial neglect. Nature 395:166–169

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schindler I, Kerkhoff G, Karnath H-O, Keller I, Goldenberg G (2002) Neck muscle vibration induces lasting recovery in spatial neglect. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 73:412–419

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Walker R, Findlay JM (1996) Saccadic eye movement programming in unilateral neglect. Neuropsychologia 34:493–508

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson B, Cockburn J, Halligan P (1987) Development of a behavioral test of visuospatial neglect. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 68:98–102

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by grants from the Leverhulme Trust and the Wellcome Trust. We thank Jackie McPherson, Robin Edwards and David van Vliet for their assistance in computer programming.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Chris Dijkerman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dijkerman, H.C., McIntosh, R.D., Milner, A.D. et al. Ocular scanning and perceptual size distortion in hemispatial neglect: effects of prism adaptation and sequential stimulus presentation. Exp Brain Res 153, 220–230 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-003-1595-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-003-1595-1

Keywords

Navigation