Skip to main content
Log in

When practice leads to co-articulation: the evolution of geometrically defined movement primitives

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The skilled generation of motor sequences involves the appropriate choice, ordering and timing of a sequence of simple, stereotyped movement elements. Nevertheless, a given movement element within a well-rehearsed sequence can be modified through interaction with its neighboring elements (co-articulation). We show that extensive training on a sequence of planar hand trajectories passing through several targets resulted in the co-articulation of movement components, and in the formation of new movement elements (primitives). Reduction in movement duration was accompanied by the gradual replacement of straight trajectories by longer curved ones, the latter affording the maximization of movement smoothness. Surprisingly, the curved trajectories were generated even when new target configurations were introduced, i.e., when target distances were scaled, movement direction reversed or when different start and end positions were used, indicating the acquisition of geometrically defined movement elements. However, the new trajectories were not shared by the untrained hand. Altogether, our results suggest that novel movement elements can be acquired through extensive training in adults.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3A, B
Fig. 4A, B
Fig. 5A–D
Fig. 6A, B
Fig. 7A, B
Fig. 8
Fig. 9A–C
Fig. 10A, B
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abend W, Bizzi E, Morasso P (1982) Human arm trajectory formation. Brain 105:331–348

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Adi-Japha E, Levin I, Solomon S (1998) Emergence of representation in drawing: the relation between kinematics and referential aspects. Cogn Dev 13:25–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bapi RS, Doya K, Harner MA (2000) Evidence for effector independent and dependent representations and their differential time course of acquisition during motor sequence learning. Exp Brain Res 132:149–162

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berthier NE (1996) Learning to reach: a mathematical model. Dev Psychol 32:811–823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bizzi E, Tresch MC, Saltiel P, d’Avella A (2000) New perspectives on spinal motor systems. Nat Rev Neurosci 1:101–108

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn CS, Young S (2000) A self-learning predictive model of articulator movements during speech production. J Acoust Soc Am 107:1659–1670

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Edelman S, Flash T (1987) A model of handwriting. Biol Cybern 57:25–36

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Engel KC, Flanders M, Soechting JF (1997) Anticipatory and sequential motor control in piano playing. Exp Brain Res 113:189–199

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan JR, Rao AK (1995) Trajectory adaptation to nonlinear visuomotor transformation: evidence of motion planning in visually perceived space. J Neurosci 74: 2174–2177

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Flash T, Gurevich I (1992) Human motor adaptation to external loads. In: Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, vol 13, pp 885–886

  • Flash T, Henis EA (1991) Arm trajectory modification during reaching towards visual targets. J Cogn Neurosci 3:220–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Flash T, Hogan N (1985) The coordination of arm movements: An experimentally confirmed mathematical model. J Neurosci 5:1688–1703

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Flash T, Henis E, Inzelberg R, Korczyn AD (1992) Timing and sequencing of human arm trajectories: normal and abnormal motor behavior. Hum Move Sci 11:83–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghahramani Z, Wolpert DM (1997) Modular decomposition in visuomotor learning. Nature 386:392–395

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ghilardi MF, Gordon J, Ghez C (1995) Learning a visuomotor transformation in a local area of workspace produces directional biases in other areas. J Neurophysiol 73:2535–2539

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon J, Ghilardi MF, Ghez C (1994) Accuracy of planar reaching movements. I. Independence of direction and extended variability. Exp Brain Res 99:97–111

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hardcastle W, Marchal A (1990) Speech production and speech modeling. Kluwer Academic Press, Dordrecht

  • Hikosaka O, Rand MK, Miyachi S, Miyashita K (1995) Learning of sequential movements in the monkey: process of learning and retention of memory. J Neurophysiol 74:1652–1661

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hikosaka O, Nakahara H, Rand M.K, Sakai K, Lu X, Nakamura K, Miyachi S, Doya K (1999) Parallel neural networks for learning sequential procedures. Trends Neurosci 22:464–471

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hofsten C (1991) Structuring of early reaching movements: a longitudinal study. J Mot Behav 23:280–292

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hollerbach JM, Flash T (1982) Dynamic interaction between limb segments during planar arm movements. Biol Cybern 44:67–77

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs S, Hanneton S, Heude S, Roby-Brami A (2003) Is the velocity–curvature relationship disrupted in apraxic patients? Neuroreport 14:1907–1911

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jerde TE, Soechting JF, Flanders M (2003) Coarticulation in fluent finger spelling. J Neurosci 23:2383–2393

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Karni A, Meyer G, Jezzard P, Adams MM, Turnder R, Ungerleider LG (1995) Functional MR evidence for adult motor cortex plasticity during motor skill learning. Nature 377:155–158

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Karni A, Meyer G, Rey-Hipolito C, Jezzard P, Adams MM, Turner R, Ungerleider LG (1998) The acquisition of skilled motor performance: fast and slow experience-driven changes in primary motor cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:861–868

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kent RD, Minifie FD (1977) Coarticulation is recent speech production models. J Phonetics 5:115–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Konczak J, Borutta M, Topka H, Dichgans J (1995) The development of goal-directed reaching in infants: hand trajectory formation and joint force control. Exp Brain Res 106:156–168

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krebs HI, Aisen ML, Volpe BT, Hogan N (1999) Quantization of continuous arm movements in humans with brain injury. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:4645–4649

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacNeilage PF (1980) Speech production. Lang Speech 23:3–22

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morasso P (1981) Spatial control of arm movements. Exp Brain Res 43:223–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Morasso P, Mussa-Ivaldi FA (1982) Trajectory formation and handwriting: a computational model. Biol Cybern 45:131–142

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mussa-Ivaldi FA, Bizzi E (2000) Motor learning through the combination of primitives. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 355:1755–1769

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nudo R, Millike GW, Jenkins WM, Merzenich MM (1996) Use-dependent alterations of movement representations in primary motor cortex of adult squirrel monkeys. J Neurosci 16:785–807

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rand MK, Hikosaka O, Miyachi S, Lu X, Miyashita K (1998) Characteristics of a long-term procedural skill in the monkey. Exp Brain Res 118:293–297

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rohrer B, Fasoli S, Krebs HI, Hughes R, Volpe B, Frontera WR, Stein J, Hogan N (2002) Movement smoothness changes during stroke recovery. J Neurosci 22:8297–8304

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shadmehr R, Mussa-Ivaldi FA (1994) Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task. J Neurosci 14:3208–3224

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Todorov E, Jordan MI (2002) Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination. Nat Neurosci 5:1110–1111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Torres E, Zipser D (2002) Reaching to grasp with a multi-jointed arm. I. Computational model. J Neurophysiol 88:2355–2367

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Viviani P, Flash T (1995) Minimum-jerk, two-thirds power law, and isochrony: converging approaches to movement planning. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 21:32–53

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Viviani P, Terzuolo C (1982) Trajectory determines movement dynamics. J Neurosci 7:431–437

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wada Y, Kawato M (1995) A theory for cursive handwriting base on the minimization principle. Biol Cybern 73:3–13

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wada Y, Koike Y, Vatikiotis-Bateson E, Kawato M (1995) A computational theory for movement pattern recognition based on optimal movement pattern generation. Biol Cybern 73:15–25

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolpert DM, Harris CM (1998) Signal dependent noise determines motor planning. Nature 394:780–784

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z, Jordan MI (1995) Are arm trajectories planned in kinematic or dynamic coordinates? An adaptation study. Exp Brain Res 103:460–470

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We sincerely thank Drs. Magnus Richardson and Felix Polyakov for many helpful discussions and for assistance in modeling the data. This work was supported in part by the Einhorn-Dominic Foundation and by the Morros laboratory.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ronen Sosnik.

Additional information

The first two authors contributed equally to this work

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sosnik, R., Hauptmann, B., Karni, A. et al. When practice leads to co-articulation: the evolution of geometrically defined movement primitives. Exp Brain Res 156, 422–438 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-003-1799-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-003-1799-4

Keywords

Navigation