Abstract
The present study was performed to examine if there are functional differences between the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) and the abductor digit minimi (ADM) muscles during different muscle contractions, namely dynamic and static contractions of the index and little finger abductions. It was also examined whether these functional differences occur at the cortical level. The motor evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and force curves, during the muscle contractions, were simultaneously recorded. Rest motor thresholds (RMTs) and active motor thresholds (AMTs), during dynamic and static contractions, were determined in the two muscles. In all trials, the background EMGs (B.EMGs) were kept at the same level in each muscle. Results showed that the target matching errors of dynamic contractions were statistically smaller in the FDI muscle than those in the ADM. In the FDI muscle, the AMT during dynamic contractions was significantly lower than during static ones and the MEPs elicited by TMS were larger during dynamic contractions than those during static ones. However, such results were not found in the ADM muscle. In order to investigate whether the differences were caused by the excitability changes that occurred in the cortical level, the responses elicited by subcortical stimulations were recorded using the same procedures as the experiment of TMS. Responses to subcortical stimulations during dynamic contractions were similar to those during static ones in either muscle. It is concluded that there are differences in the task-dependent MEP facilitations between the FDI and ADM muscles. And the differences are due to the functional demanded excitability changes accompanied by the cortical activation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbruzzese G, Trompetto C (2002) Clinical and research methods for evaluating cortical excitability. J Clin Neurophysiol 19:307–321
Arányi Z, Mathis J, Hess CW, Rösler KM (1998) Task-dependent facilitation of motor evoked potentials during dynamic and steady muscle contractions. Muscle Nerve 21:1309–1316
Bortoff GA, Strick PL (1993) Corticospinal terminations in two new-world primates: further evidence that corticomotoneuronal connections provide part of the neural substrate for manual dexterity. J Neurosci 13:5105–5118
Capaday C (1997) Neurophysiological methods for studies of motor system in freely moving human subjects. J Neurosci Meth 74:201–218
Datta AK, Harrison LM, Stephens JA (1989) Task-dependent changes in the size of response to magnetic brain stimulation in human first dorsal interosseous muscle. J Physiol (Lond) 418:13–23
Di Lazzaro V, Oliviero A, Saturno E, Pilato F, Insola A, Mazzone P, Profice P, Tonali P, Rothwell JC (2001) The effect on corticospinal volleys of reversing the direction of current induced in the motor cortex by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Exp Brain Res 138:268–273
Enoka RM, Fuglevand AJ (2001) Motor unit physiology: some unsolved issues. Muscle Nerve 24:4–17
Flament D, Goldsmith P, Buckley CJ, Lemon RN (1993) Task dependence of responses in first dorsal interosseous muscle to magnetic brain stimulation in man. J Physiol (Lond) 464:361–378
Hasegawa Y, Kasai T, Tsuji T, Yahagi S (2001a) Further insight into the task-dependent excitability of motor evoked potentials in first dorsal interosseous muscle in humans. Exp Brain Res 140:387–396
Hasegawa Y, Kasai T, Kinoshita H, Yahagi S (2001b) Modulation of a motor evoked response to transcranial magnetic stimulation by the activity level of the first dorsal interosseous muscle in humans when grasping a stationary object with different grip widths. Neurosci Lett 299:1–4
Kaneko K, Kawai S, Fuchigami Y, Morita H, Ofuji A (1996a) The effect of current direction induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation on the corticospinal excitability in human brain. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 101:478–482
Kaneko K, Kawai S, Fuchigami Y, Shiraishi G, Ito T (1996b) Effect of stimulus intensity and voluntary contraction on corticospinal potentials following transcranial magnetic stimulation. J Neurol Sci 139:131–136
Kasai T, Yahagi S (1999) Motor evoked potentials of the first dorsal interosseous muscle in step and ramp index finger abduction. Muscle Nerve 22:1419–1425
Kischka U, Fajfr R, Fellenberg T, Hess CW (1993) Facilitation of motor evoked potentials from magnetic brain stimulation in man: a comparative study of different target muscles. J Clin Neurophysiol 10:505–512
Lemon RN, Johansson RS, Westling G (1995) Corticospinal control during reach, grasp, and precision lift in man. J Neurosci 15:6145–6156
Lemon RN, Baker SN, Davis JA, Kirkwood PA, Maier MA, Yang HS (1998) The importance of the cortico-motoneuronal system for control of grasp. Novartis Found Symp 218:202–215
Maier MA, Oliver E, Baker SN, Kirkwood PA, Morris T, Lemon RN (1997) Direct and indirect corticospinal control of arm and hand motoneurons in the squirrel monkey (saimiri sciureus). J Neurophysiol 78:721–733
Meyer RF, Feldman RG (1967) Observations on the nature of the F wave in man. Neurol 17:147–156
Peinemann A, Reimer B, Löer C, Quartarone A, Münchau A, Conrad B, Siebner HR (2004) Long-lasting increase in corticospinal excitability after 1,800 pulses of subthreshold 5 Hz repetitive TMS to the primary motor cortex. Clin Neurophysiol 115:1519–1526
Schieber MH (1999) Somatotopic gradients in the distributed organization of the human primary motor cortex hand area: evidence from small infarcts. Exp Brain Res 128:139–148
Taylor JL, Gandevia SC (2004) Noninvasive stimulation of human corticospinal tract. J Appl Physiol 96:1496–1503
Ugawa Y, Uesaka Y, Terao Y, Hanajima R, Kanazawa I (1994) Magnetic stimulation of corticospinal pathways at the foramen magnum level in humans. Ann Neurol 36:618–624
Wu L, Goto Y, Taninuki T, Kinukawa N, Tobimatsu S (2002) Different patterns of excitation and inhibition of the small hand and forearm muscles from magnetic brain stimulation in humans. Clin Neurophysiol 113:1286–1294
Yahagi S, Ni Z, Takahashi M, Takeda Y, Tsuji T, Kasai T (2003) Excitability changes of motor evoked potentials dependent on muscle properties and contraction modes. Motor Control 7:328–345
Ziemann U, Ilic TV, Alle H, Meintzschel F (2004) Cortico-motoneuronal excitation of three hand muscles determined by a novel penta-stimulation technique. Brain 127:1887–1898
Acknowledgements
The present study was supported by a grant from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan (T.K.: NO 16500380). We thank the anonymous reviewers whose comments improved the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ni, Z., Takahashi, M., Yamashita, T. et al. Functional demanded excitability changes of human hand motor area. Exp Brain Res 170, 141–148 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-005-0201-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-005-0201-0