Abstract
Response time, or latency, is increasingly being used to provide information about neural decision processes. LATER (Linear Approach to Threshold with Ergodic Rate) is a quasi-Bayesian model of decision-making, with the additional feature that it introduces a degree of gratuitous randomisation into the decision process. It has had some success in predicting latencies under various conditions, but has not specifically been applied to an equally important aspect of decision-making, namely errors: a complete model of decision-making should not only account for latency distributions of correct decisions but also of wrong ones. We therefore used a decision task that generates large numbers of errors: subjects are told to look at suddenly appearing targets of one colour, but not another. We found that subjects’ faster responses are as likely to be correct as wrong, but eventually the latency distributions diverge, with errors becoming infrequent. It seems that colour information, arriving after a delay, results both in cancellation of the developing response to the mere existence of the target and in delayed initiation of the correct response. A simple model, using LATER units in a similar way to one that has previously successfully modelled countermanding, accurately predicts latency distributions and proportions of all responses, whether correct or incorrect, demonstrating that the LATER model can indeed account for errors as well as correct responses.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Asrress KN, Carpenter RHS (2001) Saccadic countermanding: a comparison of central and peripheral stop signals. Vis Res 41:2645–2651
Bichot NP, Schall JD (1999) Saccade target selection in macaque during feature and conjunction visual search. Vis Neurosci 16:81–89
Boucher L, Palmieri TJ, Logan GD, Schall JD (2007) Inhibitory control in mind and brain: an interactive race model of countermanding saccades. Psychol Rev 114:376–397
Brown HD, Heathcote A (2008) The simplest complete model of choice response time: linear ballistic accumulation. Cogn Psychol 57:153–178
Camalier CR, Gotier A, Murthy A, Thompson KG, Logan GD, Palmieri TJ, Schall JD (2007) Dynamics of saccade target selection: race model analysis of double step and search step saccade production in human and macaque. Vis Res 47:2187–2211
Carpenter RHS (1981) Oculomotor Procrastination. In: Fisher DF, Monty RA, Senders JW (eds) Eye movements: cognition and visual perception. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 237–246
Carpenter RHS (1988) Movements of the eyes. Pion, London
Carpenter RHS (1994) SPIC: a PC-based system for rapid measurement of saccadic responses. J Physiol 480:4 (Proceedings)
Carpenter RHS, Williams MLL (1995) Neural computation of log likelihood in the control of saccadic eye movements. Nature 377:59–62
Carpenter RHS, Reddi BAJ, Anderson AJ (2009) A simple two-stage model predicts response time distributions. J Physiol 587:4051–4062
Dodge R, Cline TS (1901) The angle velocity of eye movements. Psychol Rev 8:145–157
Gomez P, Ratcliff R, Perea M (2007) A model of the Go/No-go task. J Exp Psychol 136:389–413 (General)
Gottlieb J, Balan P (2010) Attention as a decision in information space. Trends Cogn Sci 14:240–248
Hanes DP, Carpenter RHS (1999) Countermanding saccades in humans. Vis Res 39:2777–2791
Hanes DP, Schall JD (1995) Countermanding saccades in macaque. Vis Neurosci 12:929–937
Hanes DP, Schall JD (1996) Neural control of voluntary movement initiation. Science 274:427–430
Javal E (1879) Essai sur la physiologie de la lecture. Annales d’Oculometrie 82:242–253
Kim B, Basso MA (2008) Saccade target selection in the superior colliculus: a signal detection theory approach. J Neurosci 28:2991–3007
Leach JCD, Carpenter RHS (2001) Saccadic choice with asynchronous targets: evidence for independent randomisation. Vis Res 41:3437–3445
Logan GD, Cowan WB, Davis KA (1984) On the ability to inhibit responses in simple and choice reaction time tasks: a model and a method. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 10:276–291
Ober JK, Przedpelska-Ober E, Gryncewicz W, Dylak J, Carpenter RHS, Ober JJ (2003) Hand-held system for ambulatory measurement of saccadic durations of neurological patients. In: Gajda J (ed) Modelling and measurement in medicine. Komitet Biocybernityki i Inzyneierii Biomedycznej PAN, Warsaw, pp 187–198
Ratcliff R, Carpenter RHS, Reddi BAJ (2001) Putting noise into neurophysiological models of simple decision making. Nat Neurosci 4:336–337
Ratcliff R, Hasegawa YT, Hasegawa RP, Smith PL, Segraves MA (2007) Dual diffusion model for single-cell recording data from the superior colliculus in a brightness-discrimination task. J Neurophysiol 97:1756–1774
Reddi B, Carpenter RHS (2000) The influence of urgency on decision time. Nat Neurosci 3:827–831
Reddi BAJ, Asrress KN, Carpenter RHS (2003) Accuracy, information and response time in a saccadic decision task. J Neurophysiol 90:3538–3546
Schall JD (2003) Neural correlates of decision processes: neural and mental chronometry. Curr Opin Neurobiol 13:182–186
Schall JD, Bichot N (1998) Neural correlates of visual and motor processes. Curr Opin Neurobiol 8:211–217
Schall JD, Hanes DP (1993) Neural basis of saccade target selection in frontal eye field during visual search. Nature 366:467–469
Schiller PH, Malpeli JG (1977) Properties and tectal projections of the monkey retinal ganglion cells. J Neurophysiol 40:428–445
Schiller PH, Malpeli JG, Schein SJ (1979) Composition of geniculostriate input to superior colliculus of the rhesus monkey. J Neurophysiol 42:1124–1133
Sinha N, Brown JTG, Carpenter RHS (2006) Task switching as a two-stage decision process. J Neurophysiol 95:3146–3153
Smith PL (2000) Stochastic dynamic models of response time and accuracy: a foundational primer. Math Psychol 44:408–463
Smith T, Guild J (1931) The CIE colorimetric standards and their use. Trans Opt Soc 33:73–134
Smith PL, Ratcliff R (2004) Psychology and neurobiology of simple decisions. Trends Neurosci 27:161–168
Sperling G, Dosher BA (1986) Strategy and optimization in human information processing. In: Boff K, Kaufman L, Thomas J (eds) Handbook of human perception & performance, vol 1. Wiley, New York, pp 2.1–2.65
Stanford TR, Shankar S, Massoglia DP, Costello MG, Salinas E (2010) Perceptual decision-making in less than 30 milliseconds. Nat Neurosci 13:379–385
Stuphorn V, Brown JW, Schall JD (2010) Role of supplementary eye field in saccadic initiation: executive, not direct, control. J Neurophysiol 103:801–816
Thompson KG, Bichot NP (2005) A visual salience map in the primate frontal eye field. Prog Brain Res 147:251–262
Thompson KG, Hanes DP, Bichot NP, Schall JD (1996) Perceptual and motor processing stages identified in the activity of macaque frontal eye field neurons during visual search. J Neurophysiol 76:4040–4055
Wheeless LL, Boynton RM, Cohen GH (1966) Eye-movement responses to step and pulse-step stimuli. J Opt Soc Am 56:956–960
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Noorani, I., Gao, M.J., Pearson, B.C. et al. Predicting the timing of wrong decisions with LATER. Exp Brain Res 209, 587–598 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2587-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2587-1