Summary:
Distributed linear solutions are widely used in source localization to solve the ill-posed EEG/MEG inverse problem. In the classical approach based on dipole sources, these methods estimate the current densities at a great number of brain sites, typically at the nodes of a 3-D grid which discretizes the chosen solution space. The estimated current density distributions are displayed as brain electromagnetic tomography (BET) images. We have tested well known minimum norm solutions (MN, WMN, LORETA) and other linear inverse solutions [WROP, sLORETA, interference uniform, gain uniform, weight vector normalized (WVN), and a new solution named SLF (Standardized Lead Field)], using a MEG configuration (BTi Magnes 2500 WH with 148 axial magnetometers) and a realistic head model using BEM (Boundary Element Method). The solutions were compared in a noise-free condition and in the presence of noise using the classical dipole localization errors (DLE) together with a new figure of merit that we called max gain uniformity, which measures the capability of an inverse linear solution to show spots of activity with similar amplitudes on the brain electromagnetic tomographies when multiple dipole sources with similar moments are simultaneously active. Whereas some solutions (sLORETA, interference uniform and SLF) were capable of zero dipole localization errors in the noise-free case, none of them reached 100% of correct dipole localizations in the presence of a high level of Gaussian noise. The SLF solution, which has the advantage to be independent from any regularization parameter, presented the best results with the lowest max gain uniformities, with almost 100% of correct dipole localizatious with 10% of noise and more than 90% of correct localizations with 30% of noise added to the data. Nevertheless, no solution was able to combine at the same time a correct localization of single sources and the capability to visualize multiple sources with comparable amplitudes on the brain electromagnetic tomographies.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Backus, G. and Gilbert, F. The resolving power of gross earth data. Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 1968, 16: 169–205.
Coatanhay, A., Soufflet, L., Staner, L. and Boeijinga, P. EEG source identification: frequency analysis during sleep. C.R. Biologies, 2002, 325: 273–282.
Dale, A.M. and Sereno, M.I. Improved localisation of activity by combining EEG and MEG with MRI cortical surface reconstruction: A linear approach. J. Cognit. Neurosci. 1993, 5: 162–176.
Dale, A.M., Liu, A.K. and Fischl, B.R. Dynamic statistical parametric mapping: Combining fMRI and MEG for high-resolution imaging of cortical activity. Neuron, 2000: 55–67.
Ferguson, A.S., Zhang, X. and Stroink, G. A complete linear discretization for calculating the magnetic field using the boundary element method. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 1994: 41: 455–459.
Frei, E., Gamma, A., Pascual-Marqui, R., Lehmann, D., Hell, D. and Vollenweider, F.X. Localization of MDMA-Induced Brain Activity in Healthy Volonteers Using Low Resolution Brain Electromagnetic Tomography (LORETA). Human Brain Mapping, 2001, 14: 152–165.
Fuchs, M., Wagner, M. and Kastner, J. Boundary element method volume conductor models for EEG source reconstruction. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 2001, 112: 1400–1407.
Grave de Peralta Menendez, R., Hauk, O., Gonzalez Andino, S., Vogt, H. and Michel, C. Linear inverse solutions with optimal resolution kernels applied to electromagnetic tomography. Human Brain Mapping, 1997, 5: 454–467.
Grave de Peralta Menendez, R. and Gonzalez Andino, S.L. A critical analysis of linear inverse solutions. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 1998, 4: 440–448.
Grave de Peralta Menendez, R. and Gonzalez Andino, S.L. Discussing the capabilities of laplacian minimization. Brain Topography, 2000, 13: 97–104.
Grave de Peralta Menendez, R. and Gonzalez Andino, S.L. Comparison of algorithms for the localization of focal sources: evaluation with simulated data and analysis of experimental data. Int. J. Bioelectromagnetism, 2002, Vol. 4, No. 1.
Grave de Peralta Menendez, R., Murray M.M., Michel, C.M., Martuzzi, R. and Gonzalez Andino, S.L. Electrical neuroimaging based on biophysical constraints. Neuroimage, 2004, 21: 527–539.
Greenblatt, R.E., Ossadtchi, A. and Pflieger, M.E. Local linear estimators for the bioelectromagnetic inverse problem. IEEE Trans. Signal Processing, 2005, 53: 3403–3412.
Hämäläinen, M.S. and Ilmoniemi, R.J. Interpolating measured magnetic fields of the brain: Estimates of current distributions. Tech. Rep. TKK-F-A559, Helsinki Univ. Technology, 1984.
Hämäläinen, M.S. and Sarvas, J. Realistic conductivity geometry model of the human head for interpretation of neuromagnetic data. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 1989, 36: 165–171.
Leahy, R.M., Mosher, J.C. and Phillips, J.W. A comparative study of minimum norm inverse methods for MEG imaging. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of Biomagnetism, 1996.
Lawson, C.L. and Hanson, R.J. Solving least squares problems. Prentice Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1974.
Michel, C.M, Murray, M.M., Lantz, G., Gonzalez, S., Spinelli, L. and Grave de Peralta, R. EEG source imaging. Clinical Neurophysiology, 2004, 115: 2195–2222.
Moore, E.H. On the reciprocal of the general algebraic matrix. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc., 1920, 26: 394–395.
Pascual-Marqui, R.D., Michel, C.M. and Lehmann, D. Low resolution electromagnetic tomography: A new method for localizing electrical activity in the brain. Int. J. Psychophysiol., 1994, 18: 49–65.
Pascual-Marqui, R.D. Reply to comments by Hämäläinen, Ilmoniemi and Nunez. In: W. Skrandies (Ed.), Source Localization: Continuing Discussion of the Inverse Problem. ISBET Newsletter, 1995, 6: 16–28.
Pascual-Marqui, R.D. Review of methods for solving the EEG inverse problem. Int. J. Bioelectromagnetism, 1999, Vol. 1, No. 1.
Pascual-Marqui, R.D. Standardized Low-Resolution Brain Electromagnetic Tomography (sLORETA): Technical Details. Methods Find Exp. Clin. Pharmacol., 2002, 24D: 5–12.
Penrose, A. A generalized inverse for matrices. In Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc., 1955, 51: 406–413.
Philipps, C., Rugg, M.D. and Friston, K.J. Systematic regularization of linear inverse solutions of the EEG source localization problem. Neuroimage, 2002, 17: 287–301.
Soufflet, L. and Borouchaki, H. Calcul des potentiels électriques et des champs magnétiques par la méthode des intégrales de surface. Revue européenne des éléments finis, 2002, 11: 81–99.
Tikhonov, A.N. and Arsenin, V.Y. Solutions of Ill-Posed Problems. New York, Wiley, 1977.
Wagner, M., Fuchs, M. and Kastner, J. Evaluation of sLORETA in the presence of noise and multiple sources. Brain Topography, 2004, 16: 277–280.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Soufflet, L., Boeijinga, P. Linear Inverse Solutions: Simulations from a Realistic Head Model in MEG. Brain Topogr 18, 87–99 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-005-0278-6
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-005-0278-6