Monosynaptic inhibition of neurons of the substantia nigra by caudatonigral fibers
References (17)
- et al.
Electrophysiological analysis of reciprocal caudato-nigral relations
Brain Research
(1967) - et al.
Efferent projections of the head of caudate in the cat
Brain Research
(1970) - et al.
Blockage of caudate-evoked inhibition of neurons in the substantia nigra by picrotoxin
Brain Research
(1971) Topical distribution of the striatal efferents in the monkey
Exp. Neurol.
(1962)- et al.
Two types of monosynaptic inhibition of pallidal neurons by stimulation of diencephalon and substantia nigra
Brain Research
(1971) - et al.
An experimental electron microscopic study on the strionigral projection in the cat
Exp. Brain Res.
(1970) Über die afferente Leitung und Steuerung des striären Systems
Nervenarzt
(1949)
Cited by (262)
Modulation of inhibitory plasticity in basal ganglia output nuclei of patients with Parkinson's disease
2019, Neurobiology of DiseaseCitation Excerpt :The fEP is a continually increasing population response, while the silent period reflects the focal effects on a single neuron; and synaptically released neurotransmitters are known to saturate their receptors (Clements et al., 1996). Our findings are consistent with the canonical findings of concurrent suppression of spontaneous neuronal activity with extracellularly recorded positive field potentials elicited by stimulation of caudato-nigral fibers in the substantia nigra of anesthetized cats (Yoshida and Precht, 1971). Precht and Yoshida (1971) also demonstrated the blockage of these responses by picrotoxin, implicating the involvement of GABA.
The Striatal Skeleton: Medium Spiny Projection Neurons and Their Lateral Connections
2016, Handbook of Behavioral NeuroscienceNeurophysiology of Substantia Nigra Dopamine Neurons: Modulation by GABA and Glutamate
2016, Handbook of Behavioral NeuroscienceCitation Excerpt :However, this nucleus is not considered to be simply an extension of the population of GABAergic neurons located within the VTA, since the RMTg constitutes neurons that display differential characteristics, including deltaFosB expression in response to aversive stimuli and psychostimulant drugs (Colussi-Mas et al., 2007; Geisler and Wise, 2008; Perrotti et al., 2005), sensitivity to µ-receptor activation (Matsui et al., 2014), and specific afferents from the lateral habenula (Barrot et al., 2012; Quina et al., 2015), that are not present in VTA GABAergic neurons (see chapters: The Tail of the Ventral Tegmental Area/Rostromedial Tegmental Nucleus: A Modulator of Midbrain Dopamine Systems, and the Rostromedial Tegmental Nucleus: Connections with the Basal Ganglia). Both DA and GABAergic SN neurons in vivo respond to ipsilateral striatal stimulation with monosynaptic inhibitory postsynaptic potentials (IPSPs) (Grace and Bunney, 1983a,b; Yoshida and Precht, 1971) that lead to inhibition of spontaneous activity (Collingridge and Davies, 1981; Tepper and Groves, 1990) (Fig. 17.3). The latency to the onset of striatal-evoked inhibition is relatively long (in rats and mice exceeding 10 ms; Brazhnik et al., 2008; Paladini et al., 1999a; Tepper et al., 1990), consistent with the relatively slow conduction velocity and long latency antidromic responses of striatonigral neurons (~10 ms) following nigral stimulation in rats (Ryan et al., 1986).
Basal ganglia circuit loops, dopamine and motivation: A review and enquiry
2015, Behavioural Brain ResearchGeneration of the masticatory central pattern and its modulation by sensory feedback
2012, Progress in NeurobiologyCitation Excerpt :Many subcortical areas are known to influence mastication and/or to project to the trigeminal complex. These areas include the amygdala, the hypothalamus, the anterior pretectal nucleus, the red nucleus, the periaqueductal grey, the raphe nuclei, the cerebellum and various parts of the basal ganglia (nucleus accumbens, subthalamic nucleus, and substantia nigra, pars reticulata) (Fornal et al., 1996; Hatanaka et al., 2000; Inagaki et al., 1987; Krettek and Price, 1978; Lazarov et al., 2011; Nakamura and Kubo, 1978; Takeuchi et al., 1988; Yoshida and Precht, 1971). However, the following sections will focus mostly on feedback provided by sensory and cortical inputs.