Elsevier

Brain Research

Volume 158, Issue 1, 8 December 1978, Pages 171-188
Brain Research

Passive avoidance impairment in rats following cycloheximide injection into the amygdala

https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(78)90013-6Get rights and content

Abstract

Cycloheximide (CHX:1, 10 or 20 μg) was injected via indwelling cannulas into various regions of the rat brain and its effects on passive avoidance training were studied. Rats with 10 or 20 μg of CHX injected into the amygdala immediately after the training footshock exhibited amnesia for the learning experience when tested after 24 h. In contrast, animals injected with 20 μg of CHX at a site either in the internal capsule only 2 mm above the amyddaloid injection site or in the frontal cortex showed no retention deficit when tested after 24 h. A quantitative examination of protein synthesis in brain halves 30 min after unilateral injection of 20 μg of CHX into the amygdala demonstrated that total protein synthesis was inhibited by less than 10%. Autoradiographic studies revealed that this inhibition resulted from a profound, highly localized inhibition of protein synthesis in areas immediately adjacent to the cannula. A comparison of the regional pattern of protein synthesis inhibition caused by injection of CHX into either the amygdala or internal capsule suggested that CHX might produce amnesia by virtue of its localized effect on the amygdala. Control experiments revealed that injection of 20 μg CHX into the amygdala had no effect on short-term retention, or short-term performance. Injection of 20 μg of CHX into the amygdala 12 h after the footshock and no effect on long-term retention. The observed impairment of retention was shown to be dose-dependent as injection of 1 μg of CHX into the amygdala was without effect. In addition, it was demonstrated that the CHX-induced amnesia did not result from induction of local seizure activity. These data show that localized injections of small amounts of CHX into the amygdala can produce deficient memory of a training experience even though total brain protein synthesis is only slightly inhibited.

Reference (46)

  • KesnerR.P. et al.

    Effects of electrical stimulation of limbic system and midbrain reticular formation upon short- and longterm memory

    Physiol. Behav.

    (1974)
  • KesnerR.P. et al.

    A review of electrical stimulation of the brain in context of learning and retention

    Behav. Biol.

    (1974)
  • McCarthyK.D. et al.

    Preparation of pure neuronal and non-neuronal cultures from embryonic chick sympathetic ganglia: A new method based on both differential cell adhesiveness and the formation of homotypic neuronal aggregates

    Brain Research

    (1976)
  • SquireL.R. et al.

    Tyrosine hydroxylase inhibition by cycloheximide and anisomycin is not responsible for their amnesic effect

    Brain Research

    (1974)
  • ZechR. et al.

    Puromycin and cycloheximide as inhibitors of human brain acetylcholinesterase

    Brain Research

    (1975)
  • BarondesS.H.

    Relationship of biological regulatory mechanisms to learning and memory

    Nature (Lond.)

    (1965)
  • BarondesS.H. et al.

    Delayed and sustained effects of acetoxycycloheximide on memory in mice

  • BarracoR.A. et al.

    Antibiotics and memory

    Psychol. Bull.

    (1976)
  • BoydG.A.

    Autoradiography in Biology and Medicine

    (1955)
  • BriggsM.H. et al.

    The molecular basis of memory and learning

    Psychol. Rev.

    (1962)
  • CohenH.D. et al.

    Puromycin and cycloheximide: Different effects on hippocampal electrical activity

    Science

    (1966)
  • DanielsD.

    Acquisition, storage, and recall of memory for brightness discrimination by rats following intracerebral infusion of acetoxycycloheximide

    J. comp. physiol. Psychol.

    (1971)
  • EcclesJ.C.

    The Neurophysiological Basis of Mind

    (1953)
  • Cited by (43)

    • Imbalance in cerebral protein homeostasis: Effects on memory consolidation

      2020, Behavioural Brain Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      The retention session was carried out 0.5 h after training with 0.8 mA. We expected to find normal latencies based on previous work from our laboratory showing that the same dose of CXM on learning of IA, also trained with 0.8 mA, did not disrupt learning when tested 30 min post-injection [14], and on earlier experimental findings showing equivalent effects at relatively short post-training intervals (less than 3 h) using systemic and intracerebral treatment with PSIs [25–31]. The Mann-Whitney U showed that there were no significant differences in training and escape latencies (data not shown); by the same token, there were no significant differences in retention latencies between the CXM and VEH groups at any of the time intervals studied (Fig. 4).

    • Anisomycin infusion in amygdala impairs consolidation of odor aversion memory

      2008, Brain Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      The fact that Ani infusion in the pre-CS group overlaps the time of administration of both the CS and the US suggests that the formation of CS or CS–US representation has been disrupted. However, in other aversive learning, Ani infusion in BLA immediately after CS–US pairing impaired memory in fear conditioning (Schafe and LeDoux, 2000; Maren et al., 2003; Huff and Rudy, 2004; Parsons et al., 2006a) and inhibitory avoidance (Berman et al., 1978; Milekic et al., 2007; Canal and Gold, 2007). The different times of infusions (post-CS versus post-CS–US) could explain the different results.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    *

    Present address: Department of Biochemistry, Division of Chemical Neurobiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, N.C., U.S.A.

    View full text