Orientation-selective inhibition from beyond the classic visual receptive field
References (20)
- et al.
Inhibitory and sub-liminal excitatory receptive fields of simple units in cat striate cortex
Vision Res.
(1969) - et al.
Orientation specificity and response variability of cells in the striate cortex
Vision Res.
(1973) Globality and stereoscopic fusion in binocular vision
J. theor. Biol.
(1975)A quantitative study of the projection area of the central and the paracentral visual field in area 17 of the cat. II. The spatial organization of the orientation domain
Exp. Brain Res.
(1975)Perception of contours in the central fovea
Nature (Lond.)
(1965)- et al.
Significance of intracortical inhibition in the visual cortex
Nature New Biol.
(1972) - et al.
Responses to visual contours: spatio-temporal aspects of excitation in the receptive fields of simple striate neurones
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
(1971) - et al.
Receptive fields of simple cells in the cat striate cortex
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
(1973) - et al.
Lateral inhibition between orientation detectors in the human visual system
Nature (Lond.)
(1970) - et al.
Lateral inhibition between orientation detectors in the cat's visual cortex
Exp. Brain Res.
(1972)
Cited by (335)
Towards reliable object representation via sparse directional patches and spatial center cues
2023, Fundamental ResearchFeedforward mechanisms of cross-orientation interactions in mouse V1
2022, NeuronCitation Excerpt :There are conflicting views on the roles that feedforward and recurrent cortical circuitry play in generating cortical representations of the visual scene (Carandini and Heeger, 2011; Priebe and Ferster, 2012; Alitto and Dan, 2010). It is clear that the intricate recurrent cortical circuitry modifies representations (Hubel and Wiesel, 1962; Nelson and Frost, 1978; Gilbert and Wiesel, 1990), but the convergent inputs from the thalamus also play an essential role in the emergence of cortical selectivity (Chapman et al., 1991; Reid and Alonso, 1995; Ferster et al., 1996; Jin et al., 2011; Lien and Scanziani, 2013). Parsing the contributions of these circuit elements is particularly interesting when multiple stimuli are presented, as cortical responses to these stimuli are often nonlinear.
The Segmentation of Proto-Objects in the Monkey Primary Visual Cortex
2019, Current BiologyPhase-specific Surround suppression in Mouse Primary Visual Cortex Correlates with Figure Detection Behavior Based on Phase Discontinuity
2018, NeuroscienceCitation Excerpt :In monkey, cat, and mouse V1, a widely observed effect of surround modulation is surround suppression, in which visual responses are suppressed by large stimuli extending into the RF surround (Hubel and Wiesel, 1965; Blakemore and Tobin, 1972; DeAngelis et al., 1994; Levitt and Lund, 1997; Cavanaugh et al., 2002a,b; Van den Bergh et al., 2010; Adesnik et al., 2012). Previous studies have found that the surround suppression exhibits orientation selectivity, i.e., the strength of suppression is stronger (weaker) when the orientation of the surround stimulus is more (less) similar to that of the RF stimulus (Nelson and Frost, 1978; Knierim and van Essen, 1992; Cavanaugh et al., 2002a,b; Jones et al., 2002; Shushruth et al., 2012; Self et al., 2014). The surround suppression is also tuned to other stimulus features, such as stimulus contrast, motion speed, and spatial phase (Cao and Schiller, 2003; Xu et al., 2005; Shen et al., 2007).
- a
We thank P.O. Bishop for excellent facilities and Joyce Campion for skillful computer operation.
- *
Present Address: Department of Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario K7L3N6, Canada.