Elsevier

Brain Research

Volume 677, Issue 1, 17 April 1995, Pages 117-126
Brain Research

A depolarizing inhibitory response to GABA in brainstem auditory neurons of the chick

https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(95)00130-IGet rights and content

Abstract

Neurons in the brainstem auditory nuclei, n. magnocellularis and n. laminaris, of the chick are contacted by terminals containing the inhibitory neurotransmitter γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA). In this report we describe the physiological response of these neurons to GABA using an in vitro slice preparation. In brainstem auditory neurons, GABA produced a depolarization of up to 20 mV and an associated decrease in input resistance. This depolarization was inhibitory; action potentials generated by orthodromic synaptic drive, antidromic stimulation and intracellular current injection were prevented by GABA application. The GABA response still occurred when synaptic transmission was prevented by perfusing the slice with a medium containing low Ca2+ and high Mg2+ concentrations. Thus, the effects of GABA were directly on the postsynaptic neuron and not via an interneuron. Whole-cell voltage clamp of neurons revealed that the reversal potential of the inward current was approximately −45 mV, suggesting that the channel responsible for this response is not selective for Cl or K+. Pharmacological analyses suggest that this GABA receptor has properties distinct from those typical of either GABAa or GABAb receptors. Although a similar response was observed with the GABAa agonist, muscimol, it was not blocked by the GABAa antagonist, bicuculline. The response was not evoked by the GABAb agonist, baclofen, and was not blocked by the GABAb antagonist phaclofen. This unusual depolarizing response is not a common feature of all brainstem neurons. Neurons located in the neighboring medial vestibular nucleus show a more traditional response to GABA application. At resting potential, these neurons show a hyperpolarizing or biphasic response associated with a decrease in input resistance and inhibition of their spontaneous activity. GABA-induced responses in the medial vestibular nucleus are blocked by bicuculline. These results suggest that an unusual form of the GABA receptor is present in the brainstem auditory system of the chick. It is possible that this form of GABA receptor provides an efficient mechanism for inhibiting the relatively powerful EPSPs received by brainstem auditory neurons, or it may play a trophic role in the afferent regulation of neuronal integrity in this system.

References (47)

  • SivilottiL. et al.

    GABA receptor mechanisms in the central nervous system

    Prog. Neurobiol.

    (1991)
  • TrussellL.O. et al.

    Desensitization of AMPA receptors upon multiquantal neurotransmitter release

    Neuron

    (1993)
  • ZhangL. et al.

    Whole-cell patch study of GABAergic inhibition in CA1 neurons of immature rat hippocampal slices

    Dev. Brain Res.

    (1990)
  • ZhouN. et al.

    Developmental changes in the effects of drugs acting at NMDA or non-NMDA receptors on synaptic transmission in the chick cochlear nucleus (nuc. magnocellularis)

    Dev. Brain Res.

    (1992)
  • AllenT. et al.

    GABAa receptor-mediated increase in membrane chloride conductance in rat paratracheal neurones

    Br. J. Pharmacol.

    (1990)
  • AndersenP. et al.

    Two different responses of hippocampal pyramidal cells to application of γ-aminobutyric acid

    J. Physiol.

    (1980)
  • BoordR.L.

    Ascending projections of the primary cochlear nuclei and nucleus laminaris in the pigeon

    J. Comp. Neurol.

    (1968)
  • BoordR.L. et al.

    Projection of the cochlear and lagenar nerves on the cochlear nuclei of the pigeon

    J. Comp. Neurol.

    (1963)
  • BormannJ. et al.

    Mechanism of anion permeation through channels gated by glycine and γ-aminobutyric acid in mouse cultured spinal neurones

    J. Physiol.

    (1987)
  • CarrC.E. et al.

    The distribution of GABAergic neurons and terminals is correlated with funcional inhibition in the auditory system of the barn owl

    J. Comp. Neurol.

    (1989)
  • CodeR.A. et al.

    Development of GABA-immunoreactivity in brainstem auditory nuclei of the chick: Ontogeny of gradients in terminal staining

    J. Comp. Neurol.

    (1989)
  • FeigenspanA. et al.

    Pharmacology of GABA receptor Cl- channels in rat retinal bipolar cells

    Nature

    (1993)
  • FujitaI. et al.

    The role of GABAergic inhibition in processing of interaural time difference in the owl's auditory system

    J. Neurosci.

    (1991)
  • Cited by (78)

    • Expression patterns of chloride transporters in the auditory brainstem of developing chicken

      2020, Hearing Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      We were puzzled by our observation that both transporters, the inward NKCC1 as well as the outward KCC2 transporter increased their expression levels during development with highest expression occurring at P1 (last age analyzed). Several studies in the auditory brainstem report the chloride reversal potential to remain more positive than the resting potential even at post-hatch stages (Hyson et al., 1995; Monsivais et al., 2000; Monsivais and Rubel, 2001). Based on this, our initial hypothesis was a higher expression of NKCC1 at all developmental ages and a low or absent expression of KCC2 in later ages.

    • A role for inhibition in deafness-induced plasticity of the avian auditory brainstem

      2016, Neuroscience
      Citation Excerpt :

      This proposed mechanism has clear parallels to what may be happening in the chick NM following deafness. Unlike the mammalian system in which GABAA activation typically induces depolarization only during development, NM neurons continue to show a depolarizing response to GABA in maturity (Hyson et al., 1995). This depolarization may be sufficient to activate voltage-gated Ca2+ channels and thus increase intracellular Ca2+concentrations.

    • Evolution of mammalian sound localization circuits: A developmental perspective

      2016, Progress in Neurobiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      On the physiological level, a notable difference is observed between the mammalian MSO and the nucleus laminaris, its avian counterpart. Both are involved in azimuthal sound localization, but the MSO receives phasic glycinergic input that causes hyperpolarization (Grothe and Sanes, 1993, 1994), whereas the nucleus laminaris receives tonic GABAergic inhibition that causes depolarization (Hyson et al., 1995; Monsivais et al., 2000). Current evidence indicates that the nucleus laminaris processes ITDs according to the Jeffress model with the use of delay lines (Jeffress, 1948), whereas in mammals, they might be computed from the overall discharge rate within the broadly tuned MSO (Lesica et al., 2010).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text