Elsevier

Experimental Neurology

Volume 83, Issue 3, March 1984, Pages 618-628
Experimental Neurology

Electrophysiologic evidence of regeneration of lamprey spinal neurons

https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-4886(84)90128-6Get rights and content

Abstract

Morphologic evidence has shown that the anteriorly projecting axons of giant interneurons (GIs) can regenerate after spinal transection in larval sea lampreys (19). In the present study, we showed that the regenerating neurites of GIs were electrically exciteable. We also showed evidence for regeneration of descending afferent connections to GIs. Spinal cords were transected at the level of the cloaca. After at least 70 days recovery, GIs located 1.5 to 17.0 mm below the scar were impaled with microelectrodes. Stimulating electrodes were placed at various distances above the scar. Six of 13 GIs located 4 to 17 mm below the scar could be activated antidromically. For 1 GI, the rostralmost point of stimulation which elicited these responses was 13.5 mm above the scar. For the others, the range was 0.5 to 4.5 mm. Estimated average conduction velocity in regenerated neurites was 0.50 m/s compared with 1.94 m/s for the parent axon. Twelve GIs could be orthodromically activated by fixed-latency EPSPs. The most rostal point of stimulation that could elicit such responses was 0.5 to 8.5 mm above the scar. There was an inverse relationship between the farthest distance of stimulation and the distance of the GI from the scar. These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that regeneration of axons across a spinal transection is limited to neurons whose cell bodies are situated within 1 to 2 cm from the transection, and that regenerating neurites grow only a few millimeters beyond the scar.

References (19)

  • S. Jacobson et al.

    An electrophysiological study of the early stages of peripheral nerve regeneration

    Exp. Neurol.

    (1965)
  • P.M. Richardson et al.

    Peripheral nerve veve autografts to the rat spinal cord: studies with axonal tracing methods

    Brain Res.

    (1982)
  • H.S. Yin et al.

    Effects of axotomy on lamprey spinal neurons

    Exp. Neurol.

    (1981)
  • D.A. Baylor et al.

    Patterns of regeneration between individual nerve cells in the central nervous system of the leech

    Nature (London)

    (1971)
  • C.M. Berry et al.

    The electrical activity of regenerating nerves in the cat

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (1944)
  • M.H. Brill et al.

    Conduction velocity in myelinated fibers: computed dependence on internode distance

    J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry

    (1977)
  • J.T. Buchanan

    Identification of interneurons with contralateral, caudal axons in the lamprey spinal cord: synaptic interactions and morphology

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (1982)
  • B.G. Cragg et al.

    The conduction velocity of regenerated peripheral nerve fibers

    J. Physiol. (London)

    (1964)
  • S. David et al.

    Axonal elongation into peripheral nervous system “bridges” after central nervous system injury in adult rats

    Science

    (1981)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (14)

  • RhoA activation in axotomy-induced neuronal death

    2018, Experimental Neurology
    Citation Excerpt :

    RhoA inactivation fosters axon growth and functional recovery following SCI (Lehmann et al., 1999; Dergham et al., 2002; Fournier et al., 2003), but because in mammalian SCI experiments it is difficult to distinguish regeneration of severed axons from collateral sprouting by spared axons, it is not clear whether RhoA is suppressing axon regeneration or only sprouting, two processes that appear to have different mechanisms (Lee et al., 2010; Koch et al., 2014). We have used the lamprey as an experimental model to get around this difficulty because its axons regenerate after complete spinal cord injury and regeneration is easily documented by histological and electrophysiological means (Rovainen, 1976; Selzer, 1978; Yin and Selzer, 1983, 1984; Cohen et al., 1988; Davis Jr and McClellan, 1994a; Banerjee et al., 2016). Although lamprey reticulospinal axons can regenerate after SCI, the regeneration is not complete.

  • Non-mammalian model systems for studying neuro-immune interactions after spinal cord injury

    2014, Experimental Neurology
    Citation Excerpt :

    In most studies of SCI in lamprey, the injury model is a complete transection. Full functional recovery is achieved over a stereotypical time course of 12 weeks, which corresponds to regeneration of reticulospinal axons through the lesion site (Cohen et al., 1986, 1989; Rovainen, 1967, 1976; Selzer, 1978; Wood and Cohen, 1979, 1981; Yin and Selzer, 1984). The lamprey spinal cord is non-myelinated and contains descending axons from reticulospinal neurons, as well as intraspinal motor neurons, sensory neurons and interneurons (Grillner and Jessell, 2009).

  • Mechanical properties of the lamprey spinal cord: Uniaxial loading and physiological strain

    2013, Journal of Biomechanics
    Citation Excerpt :

    A significant amount of force experiments have been done in rodent models, which has allowed us to better understand the biomechanics of the spinal cord (1.2 MPa) and the physiological and in vitro effects of applied forces on nerves (e.g. stretching) (Maikos et al., 2008; Russell et al., 2012; Abe et al., 2002; Bora et al., 1980; Ichimura et al., 2005; Jou et al., 2000; Spiegel et al., 1993; Pfister et al., 2004; Pfister et al., 2006). Our animal model of choice, lamprey (Petromyzon Marinus), is a basal vertebrate model used to study spinal cord regeneration (Cohen et al., 1989; Cohen et al. 1988, 1986; Buchanan and Cohen, 1982; Lurie and Selzer, 1991a, 1991b; Yin and Selzer, 1984, 1983; Oliphint et al., 2010) and animal locomotion (Cohen et al., 1990; Cohen, 1988, 1987; Cohen et al., 1982; Cohen and Wallen, 1980; Tytell et al., 2010). We used the lamprey for its regenerative capabilities after SCI and thus their usefulness in understanding this process.

View all citing articles on Scopus
1

We thank Ms. Laurie Youngs for help in preparing figures. Supported by NIH grant NS 14387.

View full text