Elsevier

Vision Research

Volume 27, Issue 6, 1987, Pages 993-1015
Vision Research

Sensitivity of smooth eye movement to small differences in target velocity

https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(87)90014-9Get rights and content

Abstract

The precision of smooth pursuit eye movements was described by means of a new dependent measure, the “oculomotor difference threshold” (analogous to the perceptual difference threshold) which represents the smallest difference in target velocity that produces statistically distinguishable differences in eye velocity. Oculomotor difference thresholds for constant velocity motions were largest (>50% of target velocity) during the initial 200msec of target motion, despite fairly high average gains (0.7–1.4) during the same period. Oculomotor difference thresholds declined over time. By about 600–700 msec after the onset of target motion they reached values as low as the perceptual difference thresholds measured psychophysically with the same target velocities. The similarity of the difference thresholds suggests that equally precise sensory representations of target velocity influenced perception and smooth eye movements. Nonsensory influences on smooth eye movement were also found. Smooth pursuit velocity:

  • (1)

    depended on the velocity of targets in preceding trials;

  • (2)

    was decreased during the initial 200 msec of target motion when the duration of motion was reduced from 1 sec to 200 msec, a result which shows that high initial pursuit velocity depends on the expectation that pursuit will continue. These effects of context and expected duration allowed the eye to achieve quickly a velocity close to that of the target it was most likely to encounter. Study of the precision of pursuit may be valuable for characterizing its sensory input, but study of the effects of the context in which a stimulus appears and the effects of expectations about future target motion may be more valuable for understanding how smooth eye movements guarantee retinal image velocities optimal for vision.

References (50)

  • MurphyB.J.

    Pattern thresholds for moving and stationary gratings during smooth eye movement

    Vision Res.

    (1978)
  • MurphyB.J. et al.

    Slow oculomotor control in the presence of moving backgrounds

    Vision Res.

    (1975)
  • OrbanG.A. et al.

    Factors influencing velocity coding in the human visual system

    Vision Res.

    (1984)
  • St. CyrG.J. et al.

    Nonlinearities of the human oculomotor system: gain

    Vision Res.

    (1969)
  • SteinmanR.M. et al.

    Binocular retinal image motion during active head rotation

    Vision Res.

    (1980)
  • SteinmanR.M. et al.

    Voluntary control of smooth pursuit velocity

    Vision Res.

    (1969)
  • BarlowH.B.

    Increment thresholds at low intensities considered as signal/noise discrimination

    J. Physiol., Lond.

    (1957)
  • BarlowH.B.

    Optic nerve impulses and Weber's law

  • BarlowH.B.

    Temporal and spatial summation in human vision at different background intensities

    J. Physiol., Lond.

    (1958)
  • BarlowH.B. et al.

    Three factors limiting the reliable detection of light by retinal ganglion cells of the cat

    J. Physiol., Lond.

    (1969)
  • BeverlyK.I. et al.

    The relation between discrimination and sensitivity in the perception of motion in depth

    J. Physiol., Lond.

    (1975)
  • BevingtonP.R.

    Data Reduction and Error Analysis for the Physical Sciences

    (1969)
  • CampbellF.W. et al.

    Spatial-frequency discrimination in human vision

    J. opt. Soc. Am.

    (1970)
  • CollewijnH. et al.

    Human smooth and saccadic eye movements during voluntary pursuit of different target motions on different backgrounds

    J. Physiol., Lond.

    (1984)
  • CraneH.D. et al.

    Accurate three dimensional eye tracker

    Appl. Opt.

    (1978)
  • Cited by (114)

    • Visualization and quantification of eye tracking data for the evaluation of oculomotor function

      2019, Heliyon
      Citation Excerpt :

      A normal change in the environment may cause a change in the performance of a smooth pursuit related task, such as attention or background changes behind the target (Van Donkelaar and Drew, 2002; Souto and Kerzel, 2011). Smooth pursuit performance is also affected by target position (Pola and Wyatt, 2001), target velocity (Kowler and McKee, 1987; Meyer et al., 1985), target visibility (Becker and Fuchs, 1985; Pola and Wyatt, 1997), target direction (Engel et al., 2000) and predictability of target direction (Soechting et al., 2010). Abnormal smooth pursuit movements may be the result of increasing age (Morrow and Sharpe, 1993; Dowiasch et al., 2015) or various disorders and dysfunctions, ranging from low to high severity across a spectrum of conditions.

    • Motor Sequence Learning in the Brain: The Long and Short of It

      2018, Neuroscience
      Citation Excerpt :

      A good example of this transition is observed during pursuit eye movements of repeated single-velocity ramps, double-step ramps and sinusoids (Kao and Morrow, 1994; Barnes and Donelan, 1999; Wells and Barnes, 1999; Barnes et al., 2000; Barnes and Schmid, 2002; Collins and Barnes, 2005). The outcome of this learning is revealed by the early initiation (latency) of the movement, with eye velocity increasing toward a moving target prior to the brain receiving the information to drive the movement response (Kowler and McKee, 1987). Furthermore, prediction in pursuit results from the learning of not only timing, but also direction and velocity of the up-coming stimulus presentation (Barnes and Donelan, 1999; Wells and Barnes, 1999).

    • The role of eye movements in motion perception

      2021, Giornale Italiano di Psicologia
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text