Nicotine gum: Chew rate, subjective effects and plasma nicotine

https://doi.org/10.1016/0091-3057(88)90197-9Get rights and content

Abstract

Two studies were conducted to assess the effects of varying the rate at which single pieces of nicotine gum (4 mg) were chewed. In each study, six cigarette-deprived volunteers were tested during four sessions.In each session they were required to chew the gum for 10 min at varying rates; a variety of self-report and physiologic responses were recorded before and after chewing. All chewed gum was analyzed for amount of nicotine extracted, and blood samples were collected for nicotine analysis. Additionally, in Experiment 2, a measure of masticatory pressure was employed to assess the intensity of chewing and to empirically verify the number of chews. In both studies, we found a weak, but direct, relation between chew rate and the amount of extracted nicotine. Experiment 2 relealed a probable cause of the weaker than expected “dose-effect” function: subjects showed compensatory changes in behavior by chewing slower than instructed in the high rate conditions, and by chewing faster than instructed in the low rate conditions. Thus, despite instructions to vary chew rates across an 8-fold range, actual chew rate varied by only 2.2-fold. Intensity of chewing remained constant across conditions. Taken together, the findings suggest that rate of chewing nicotine gum can make a difference in the amount of nicotine extracted from the gum; however, compensatory changes in chew rate may attenuate attempts to systematically vary nicotine dose in this manner.

References (10)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (29)

  • Nicotine delivery and pharmacologic response from Verve, an oral nicotine delivery product

    2015, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
    Citation Excerpt :

    However, ‘liking’ for a new product is typically quite low among established tobacco users that have self-selected a product from the vast array of oral and combustible tobacco products in the market (Chen et al., 2010; Borgerding et al., 2012). ‘Liking’ scores for nicotine polacrilex are also typically quite low (Pickworth et al., 1986; Houtsmuller et al., 2002; Nemeth-Coslett et al., 1988). The limited and rather slow nicotine absorption from the ONDP and the low to moderate ratings on product ‘liking’ suggest an overall low to moderate risk of abuse from this ONDP — similar to that of other oral nicotine delivery products.

  • Use of dye as tracer of drug release from medicated chewing gums

    2008, European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics
  • Release Kinetics of Catechins from Chewing Gum

    2004, Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
    Citation Excerpt :

    The amount of TP in each formulation was equivalent to 5% of the total weight of a gum, or 4 g. The experiment was performed following the procedure used by Christrup and Moller,1 Woodford and Lesko,7 Nemeth‐Coslett et al.,8 and Rider.9 In this procedure, every volunteer chewed a piece of gum for a certain period of time; the remaining amount of active substances in the gum was then analyzed.

  • Caffeine antagonizes EEG effects of tobacco withdrawal

    1994, Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior
View all citing articles on Scopus

Supported, in part, by USPHS Grants DA 02277 and DA 32389.

View full text