Elsevier

Brain Research Reviews

Volume 13, Issue 1, January–March 1988, Pages 25-42
Brain Research Reviews

Spatial organization of the peripheral input to area 1 cell columns. I. the detection of ‘segregates’

https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0173(88)90003-3Get rights and content

Abstract

Extracellular single neuron recording methods are used to study the RFs of neurons comprising area 1 cell columns in unanesthetized Macaca fascicularis monkeys. The RF data obtained in approximately radial microelectrode penetrations demonstrate that the RFs of neurons located within the same area 1 cell columns can differ strikingly, and that it is common for neighboring neurons to possess RFs differing greatly in size or configuration. However, the RF variations detected within a typical area 1 cell minicolumn (single cell radial column) appear to be substantially less than the variations observed for nearby neurons lying in different minicolumns.

The RF data obtained from arrays of penetrations suggest that the skin representation in the forelimb region of area 1 is organized in a discontinuous, steplike fashion: as a mosaic of discrete 600 μm wide radial cell columns— segregates. Although the RFs of neurons of a segregate can vary substantially in size and configuration, they all share in common a single small area on the skin. The boundaries of a segregate can be mapped precisely because, unlike the situation for neurons located within the same segregate, some of the neurons located on opposite sides of a segregate boundary (belonging to different segregates) have non-overlapping RFs. Furthermore, it appears that within any given segregate there is no systematic shift in RF location as the electrode advances through a sequence of minicolumns. Systematic RF shifts occurred only when the electrode traversed the boundary between neighboring segregates.

References (25)

  • T.M. McKenna et al.

    Neurons with unusual response and receptive-field properties in upper laminae of cat SI cortex

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (1984)
  • T.M. McKenna et al.

    Anterior parietal cortical topographic organization in macaque monkey: a re-evaluation

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (1982)
  • Cited by (69)

    • Dynamic representations of the somatosensory cortex

      2010, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
    • Hierarchical self-organization of minicolumnar receptive fields

      2004, Neural Networks
      Citation Excerpt :

      Our system is based on a model of the cortical macrocolumn or segregate (Favorov & Diamond, 1990). Macrocolumns can be identified both anatomically and physiologically (Elston & Rosa, 2000; Favorov & Diamond, 1990; Lubke, Egger, Sakmann, & Feldmeyer, 2000) and are shown to process stimuli from the same source such as an area of the visual field or a patch of a the body surface (Favorov & Diamond, 1990; Favorov & Whitsel, 1988). The macrocolumn consists of a number of minicolumns1 which present the smallest neural modules and consist of several tens up to a few hundred neurons (Peters & Yilmaze, 1993) (see Buxhoeveden and Casanova, 2002; Mountcastle, 1997, for overviews and Jones, 2000, for a critical discussion).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text