Network analysis of brain cognitive function using metabolic and blood flow data

https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-4328(94)00139-7Get rights and content

Abstract

Functional neuroimaging has become a powerful tool for investigating the neurobiological foundations of cognition. An overview is presented of the two major strategies by which such data are currently analyzed. One strategy compares the pattern of activity between two (or more) tasks, looking for those brain areas that show significant changes. The second investigates the functional relationships between regional activities in an attempt to determine the systems-level neural networks mediating the tasks. Object and spatial visual processing tasks are used to illustrate each of these strategies.

References (34)

  • K.J. Friston et al.

    Comparing functional (PET) images: the assessment of significant change

    J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab.

    (1991)
  • K.J. Friston et al.

    Plastic transformation of PET images

    J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr.

    (1991)
  • K.J. Friston et al.

    Functional connectivity: the principal-component analysis of large (PET) data sets

    J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab.

    (1993)
  • C.L. Grady et al.

    Dissociation of object and spatial vision in human extrastriate cortex: age-related changes in activation of regional cerebral blood flow measured with [15O]water and positron emission tomography

    J. Cogn. Neurosci.

    (1992)
  • J.V. Haxby et al.

    Dissociation of object and spatial visual processing pathways in human extrastriate cortex

  • L. Hayduk

    Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL

    (1987)
  • B. Horwitz

    Functional neural systems analyzed by use of interregional correlations of glucose metabolism

  • Cited by (72)

    • Brain networks activated to form object recognition memory

      2018, Brain Research Bulletin
      Citation Excerpt :

      Collectively, these results suggest that gene expression in the mPFC is required for the consolidation of OR memory. Our findings that gene expression is activated when OR memory is generated in multiple brain regions led us to analyze connectivity between these regions by computing covariance across subjects to infer interactions between neural elements (Horwitz et al., 1995; McIntosh, 1999). To do this, we first computed a complete set of inter-regional correlations in the No Object, No Habit, and NOR groups using the c-fos expression data shown in Figs. 2–3 (Fig. 5) (Wheeler et al., 2013).

    • Learning and comparing functional connectomes across subjects

      2013, NeuroImage
      Citation Excerpt :

      The main benefit of cross-validation is that it is a non-parametric method which does not rely strongly on modeling assumptions8. Horwitz el al. (1995) claimed almost 20 years ago that “the crucial concept needed for network analysis is covariance”. In our eyes, this still holds today.

    • Anxiolytic-like effect of pregabalin on unconditioned fear in the rat: An autoradiographic brain perfusion mapping and functional connectivity study

      2012, NeuroImage
      Citation Excerpt :

      In addition to examining changes in rCBF, we applied interregional correlation-based functional connectivity analysis and graph theoretical analysis to explore how footshock and PGB affect brain activity at the network level. Such analyses have emerged as powerful tools to investigate brain networks in human brain imaging (reviewed by Bullmore and Sporns, 2009; Friston, 1994; Horwitz et al., 1995), as well as in rodent imaging studies (Barrett et al., 2003; Pawela et al., 2008; Rojas et al., 2009; Schwarz et al., 2008; Soncrant et al., 1986; Wang et al., 2011). We predicted that footshock also induces increases in functional connectivity of limbic/paralimbic regions, and that PGB attenuates such fear-related increases in functional connectivity.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text