Comparative psychoacoustics
References (62)
Temporal integration of pure tones in the cat
Hear. Res.
(1983)- et al.
Hearing range of the domestic cat
Hear. Res.
(1985) - et al.
Pure tone thresholds for the Rhesus monkey
Hear. Res.
(1978) - et al.
Comparison of psychophysical and evoked-potential tuning curves in the chinchilla
Am. J. Otolaryngol.
(1982) - et al.
Response patterns of auditory nerve fibers during temporary threshold shift
Hear. Res.
(1983) - et al.
Comparison of hearing thresholds and morphological changes in the chinchilla after exposure to 4 kHz tones
Acta Otolaryngol.
(1974) Hearing in the owl monkey (Aotus rivirgatus): Auditory sensitivity
J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol.
(1974)Pure tone thresholds of the squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus)
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
(1974)A revised critical band hypothesis
- et al.
Temporal integration in two species of Old World monkeys: Blue monkeys (Cercopithecus mitis) and grey-cheeked mangabeys (Cercocebus albigena)
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
(1986)
Cochlear damage: Audiometric correlates
Noise-induced hearing loss in the chinchilla, as determined by a positive-reinforcement technique
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
Broadband masking noise and behavioral pure tone thresholds in cats
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
Comparison between AER and behavioral thresholds in normally and abnormally hearing chinchillas
Ear Hear.
Age-dependent hearing loss in normal hearing mice
Naturwissenschaften
Frequency and intensity difference limens and nonlinearities in the ear of the housemouse (Mus musculus)
J. Comp. Physiol.
Temporal summation for pure tones and white noise in the house mouse (Mus musculus)
J. Acoust Soc. Am.
Masked auditory thresholds, critical ratios, and scales of the basilar membrane of the housemouse (Mus musculus)
J. Comp. Physiol.
Effects of cochlear lesions on audiograms and intensity discrimination in cats
Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol.
Determination of Absolute-intensity thresholds and frequency difference thresholds in cats
J. Acoust Soc. Am.
Auditory Frequency discrimination in vertebrates
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
Temporal gap detection in noise as a function of frequency, bandwidth, and level
J. Acoust Soc. Am.
Gap detection by the chinchilla
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
Auditory masking in the rat
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
Detectability of tones in quiet and in noise by rats and monkeys
Directional hearing in terrestrial mammals
Aspects of psychoacoustics in non-human primates
Auditory masking and the critical band
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
Auditory intensity discrimination in the rat
J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol.
Auditory filter shapes in the chinchilla
J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
Cited by (63)
Signatures of cochlear processing in neuronal coding of auditory information
2022, Molecular and Cellular NeuroscienceCitation Excerpt :Humans have a very accurate ability to discriminate tones whose frequencies differ by only 0.2% around 1 kHz, where our ear is the most sensitive (Moore, 1973). Frequency selectivity fluctuates from 1 to 5% in other species (Fay, 1988), but such measurements are challenging to acquire and often depend on behavioral paradigms. The perceived intensity of a pure sound is reduced in the presence of a second sound (Fletcher, 1938).
Extended high frequency hearing and speech perception implications in adults and children
2020, Hearing ResearchCitation Excerpt :A fundamental principle of biology is that each species’ and individual’s sensory systems are tailored to meet the demands placed upon them by their environments and experiences. Accordingly, auditory systems across different species exhibit distinctive upper and lower limits for the frequency range of hearing (Fay, 1988; Heffner and Heffner, 2007; Heffner, 2004; Masterton et al., 1969). The audible frequency range for humans spans approximately 20 Hz to 20 kHz.
Ecological cocktail party listening reveals the utility of extended high-frequency hearing
2019, Hearing ResearchCitation Excerpt :Different species have distinctive upper and lower limits to the frequency range of hearing (Fay, 1988; Heffner and Heffner, 2007; Heffner, 2004; Masterton et al., 1969), each presumably tailored to enable reproductive success according to the environmental demands for that species.
The Spatial Resolution of Bat Biosonar Quantified with a Visual-Resolution Paradigm
2019, Current BiologyFrequency selectivity in macaque monkeys measured using a notched-noise method
2018, Hearing ResearchCitation Excerpt :Therefore, we suggest that similarities in frequency-specific filter effects may emerge if the species’ audible range is taken into account. In evaluating an animal's utility as a model for human hearing, one needs a basic understanding of the animal's psychophysical auditory abilities, such as frequency selectivity (Fay, 1988). One previous review suggests that small laboratory animals, such as mice (Ehret, 1976), rats (Gourevitch, 1965), chinchillas (Niemiec et al., 1992), and cats (Nienhuys and Clark, 1979; Pickles, 1979), have broader auditory filters than humans (see Fig. 8 in Fay, 1988), which may implicate an evolutionary aspect of frequency selectivity.