Elsevier

Hearing Research

Volume 45, Issues 1–2, April 1990, Pages 95-113
Hearing Research

Responses of DCN-PVCN neurons and auditory nerve fibers in unanesthetized decerebrate cats to AM and pure tones: Analysis with autocorrelation/power-spectrum

https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-5955(90)90186-SGet rights and content

Abstract

We investigated amplitude-modulated (AM) tone encoding behavior of dorsal and posteroventral cochlear-nucleus (DCN and PVCN) neurons and auditory nerve (AN) fibers in decerebrate unanesthetized cats. Some of the modulation transfer functions (MTFs) were narrowly-tuned band-pass functions; these included responses at moderate and high stimulus levels of DCN pause/build-type-III neurons and the following types of DCN and PVCN chopper neurons: chop-S and/or chop-type-I/III. Other MTFs were broad low-pass or complex functions. Chop-T neurons of the DCN and PVCN tended to exhibit low-pass or flat MTFs. The band-pass MTF neurons exhibited intrinsic oscillations (IOs) in responses to AM or pure tones. The IOs, which were detected in autocorrelation functions and power spectra, were closely correlated (r = 0.863) with the best envelope frequency (BEF). All of the AN fibers showed broad low-pass MTFs with some showing a rudimentary peak in the MTF. The MTFs of DCN-PVCN neurons and AN fibers showed, respectively: (1) BEFs ranging 50–500 Hz, and 400–1300 Hz; (2) upper cut-off frequencies ranging 200–1200 Hz, and 1600–3200 Hz. At stimulus levels of 60–85 dB SPL, maximum modulation gains were as high as 12 dB for DCN-PVCN neurons but were limited to below about 0 dB for AN fibers. The median dynamic ranges of DCN and PVCN neurons (51 and 42 dB, respectively) were substantially wider than those of the low and high spontaneous rate AN fibers (30 and 31 dB, respectively). The observation of higher modulation gain, wider dynamic range, and more narrowly-tuned MTF of DCN-PVCN neurons than AN fibers supports the concept that the capabilities to encode dynamic signals are enhanced in DCN-PVCN neurons compared with AN fibers.

References (34)

  • Frisina

    Enhancement of responses to amplitude modulation in the gerbil cochlear nucleus: single-unit recordings using an improved surgical approach

  • R.D. Frisina et al.

    Differential encoding of rapid changes in sound amplitude by second-order auditory neurons

    Exp. Brain Res.

    (1985)
  • T.J. Glattke

    Unit responses of the cat cochlear nucleus to amplitude-modulated stimuli

    J. Acoust. Soc. Am.

    (1969)
  • J.M. Goldberg et al.

    Response of binaural neurons of dog superior olivary complex to dichotic tonal stimuli: Some physiological mechanisms of sound localization

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (1969)
  • E. Javel

    Coding of AM tones in the chinchilla auditory nerve: Implications for the pitch of complex tones

    J. Acoust. Soc. Am.

    (1980)
  • D.O. Kim et al.

    A population study of cochlear nerve fibers: Comparison of spatial distributions of average-rate and phase-locking measures of responses to single tones

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (1979)
  • D.O. Kim et al.

    Cochlear mechanics: Nonlinear behavior in two-tone responses and in ear-canal sound pressure

    J. Acoust. Soc. Am.

    (1980)
  • Cited by (125)

    • 2.35 - Coding of Temporal Information

      2020, The Senses: A Comprehensive Reference: Volume 1-7, Second Edition
    • Human frequency following responses to iterated rippled noise with positive and negative gain: Differential sensitivity to waveform envelope and temporal fine-structure

      2018, Hearing Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Thus, neural phase locking related to fundamental frequency (F0) may play a dominant role in the encoding of the low pitch associated with complex sounds. The periodic complex stimuli (amplitude modulated tones, complex tones, synthetic vowels) commonly used to evaluate temporal representation of pitch relevant information in the auditory nerve (Javel, 1980; Joris and Yin, 1992; Wang and Sachs, 1993; Cariani and Delgutte, 1996a; b; Cedolin and Delgutte, 2005) and cochlear nucleus (Kim et al., 1986; Greenberg and Rhode, 1987; Kim and Leonard, 1988; Frisina et al., 1990a; b; Kim et al., 1990; Palmer and Winter 1992; Rhode and Greenberg, 1994; Wang and Sachs, 1994; Rhode, 1995; Zhao and Liang, 1995; Keilson et al., 1997; Rhode, 1998) characteristically contain strong envelope modulation. In several of these studies, onset and chopper neurons in the cochlear nucleus have shown a stronger synchronization to the fundamental frequency compared to the primary-like neurons in the auditory nerve and cochlear nucleus (Frisina et al., 1990a; b; Keilson et al., 1997; Rhode, 1998; Rhode and Greenberg, 1994; Wang and Sachs, 1994).

    • Background firing in the auditory midbrain of the frog

      2017, IBRO Reports
      Citation Excerpt :

      The hazard functions, being rigidly connected with the ISIs, do not change after shuffling. The shuffling also does not affect the steady-state value of the autocorrelation function, which (after our normalization) is always equal to the average spike rate (see Kim et al., 1990). However, the dynamics of the autocorrelation functions, the CV2, the burstiness and interdependence between neighboring intervals can be significantly changed.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text