Elsevier

Hearing Research

Volume 89, Issues 1–2, September 1995, Pages 137-145
Hearing Research

Muscarinic receptor subtypes in rat dorsal cochlear nucleus

https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-5955(95)00131-6Get rights and content

Abstract

We previously reported that responses of spontaneously active rat dorsal cochlear nucleus (DCN) neurons to cholinergic agonists are mediated predominantly by muscarinic receptors. We have now tested the effects of 7 antagonists with differing affinities for the muscarinic receptor subtypes M1–M4 on the responses to constant, submaximal doses of carbachol in rat brainstem slices. Each slice was exposed to one or more concentrations of one antagonist applied during extracellular recording of a DCN neuron. The concentrations yielding 50% reduction of test responses (IC50) of regular and bursting neurons were estimated for each antagonist. Correlation coefficients were calculated between log(IC50) values and log(Ki) values of the drugs for the receptor subtypes. Correlation coeffi for both regular and bursting neurons were not significant (P>0.05) for M1 and M3, but were significant (P<0.02) for M4. Bursting but not regular neurons also showed a significant correlation for M2 (P<0.05). Our results suggest that (1) M4 contributes to the cholinergic responses in DCN and M2 may also contribute to the responses of bursting neurons, but the contribution of other subtypes cannot be completely excluded; (2) muscarinic subtypes in DCN probably differ from those reported for cochlea and some brain regions.

References (55)

  • W. Kromer

    Receptor classification using antagonists without determining pA2 values

    Trends Pharmacol. Sci.

    (1991)
  • G. Lambrecht et al.

    p-Fluoro-hexahydro-sila-difenidol: the first M-selective muscarinic antagonist

    Eur. J. Pharmacol.

    (1988)
  • C.F. Liao et al.

    Molecular cloning and expression of a fifth muscarinic acetylcholine receptor

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1989)
  • T.A. Pitler et al.

    Activation of pharmacologically defined M3 muscarinic receptor depolarizes hippocampal pyramidal cells

    Brain Res.

    (1990)
  • M.T. Vilaró et al.

    Muscarinic cholinergic receptors in the rat caudate-putamen and olfactory tubercle belong predominantly to the m4 class: in situ hybridization and receptor autoradiography evidence

    Neuroscience

    (1991)
  • E.M. Whitham et al.

    M3 muscarinic cholinoceptors are linked to phosphoinositide metabolism in rat cerebellar granule cells

    Eur. J. Pharmacol.

    (1991)
  • R.B. Barlow et al.

    A comparison of affinity constants for muscarine-sensitive acetylcholine receptors in guinea-pig atrial pacemaker cells at 29 C and in ileum at 29 C and 37 C

    Br. J. Pharmacol.

    (1976)
  • A.S. Berrebi et al.

    Distribution and targets of the cartwheel cell axon in the dorsal cochlear nucleus of the guinea pig

    Anat. Embryol.

    (1991)
  • T.I. Bonner et al.

    Identification of a family of muscarinic acetylcholine receptor genes

    Science

    (1987)
  • N.J. Buckley et al.

    Antagonist binding properties of five cloned muscarinic receptors expressed in CHO-K1 cells

    Mol. Pharmacol.

    (1989)
  • M.P. Caulfield et al.

    Pharmacology of the putative M4 muscarinic receptor mediating Ca-current inhibition in neuroblastoma × glioma hybrid (NG 108-15) cells

    Br. J. Pharmacol.

    (1991)
  • K. Chen et al.

    Effects of cholinergic agonists and antagonists on spontaneous activity of rat dorsal cochlear nucleus neurons: in vitro studies

    Soc. Neurosci. Abstr.

    (1992)
  • K. Chen et al.

    Cholinergic effects on spontaneous activity of rat dorsal cochlear nucleus neurons

    Abstr. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol.

    (1993)
  • K. Chen et al.

    Cholinergic modulation of spontaneous activity in rat dorsal cochlear nucleus

    Hearing Res.

    (1994)
  • K. Chen et al.

    Glutamate antagonists affect cholinergic activation of bursting neurons in rat dorsal cochlear nucleus

    Abstr. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol.

    (1994)
  • V. Dolezal et al.

    Muscarinic receptor blockade increases basal acetylcholine release from striatal slices

    J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.

    (1990)
  • F. Dörje et al.

    Antagonist binding profiles of five cloned human muscarinic receptor subtypes

    J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.

    (1991)
  • Cited by (21)

    • Acoustic startle response affected by aging and cholinergic neurotransmitters

      2014, Journal of Otology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Previous studies have found that tinnitus may be related to spontaneous activity in the dorsal cochlear nucleus[10,11]. Cholinergic receptors have been found in the cochlear nucleus[12,13] indicating that changes in acetylcholine receptors may affect spontaneous activity at this region and therefore affect symptoms such as tinnitus and hyperacusis. Acetylcholine receptor antagonists could block the effects found in the cochlear nucleus that occurs in conjunction with tinnitus and hyperacusis whereby eliminating the perception of these disorders.

    • Intense sound-induced plasticity in the dorsal cochlear nucleus of rats: Evidence for cholinergic receptor upregulation

      2007, Hearing Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Physiological studies indicate that the AChRs exerting the most influence on spontaneous activity of neurons in the superficial DCN are predominantly muscarinic (mAChRs) (Chen et al., 1994; Chen and Jastreboff, 1995). These receptors are found mainly in the granule cell region of the cochlear nucleus and in the fusiform cell layer of the DCN (Chen et al., 1995; Jin and Godfrey, 2006), which also contains granule cells. The number of mAChRs can be upregulated in these regions of the CN as a consequence of peripheral denervation (Jin and Godfrey, 2006).

    • Spontaneous activity in rat vestibular nuclei in brain slices and effects of acetylcholine agonists and antagonists

      2002, Brain Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      The determination of the prominence of muscarinic receptor subtypes is limited by the only preferential selectivity of available muscarinic subtype antagonists. However, comparisons of the IC50 values for the muscarinic antagonists with their corresponding Ki values enables the suggestion that, as for the DCN [9], the M2 and M4 subtypes are relatively more prominent than M1 and M3 in the MVN. Although mainly excitatory effects of activation of M2 and M4 receptors in the VNC and DCN would disagree with previous literature suggesting that these muscarinic receptors mediate inhibitory neuronal responses [12], this may be indicative of regional differences in the functions of muscarinic receptor subtypes.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text