Elsevier

Alcohol

Volume 10, Issue 1, January–February 1993, Pages 37-43
Alcohol

Do rat strain differences in ethanol consumption reflect differences in ethanol sensitivity or the preparedness to learn?

https://doi.org/10.1016/0741-8329(93)90051-OGet rights and content

Abstract

Three strains of rats (Wistar, Sprague-Dawley, Long-Evans; n = 10/strain) were trained to drink various concentrations of ethanol (ETOH) in the rats' home cage in daily 30-min drinking sessions using a modified “Samson” sucrose-fading procedure. Wistar and Sprague-Dawley rats were similar in their voluntary intake of a wide range of ETOH concentrations and both of these strains drank considerably more ETOH than the Long-Evans strain. For comparison purposes only, pharmacological pretreatment tests were later conducted with the Sprague-Dawley strain of rats using a maintenance concentration of 20% w/v ETOH. Low-dose ETOH pretreatments increased (125% of control), and high-dose ETOH pretreatments decreased the subsequent voluntary consumption of ETOH. Low-dose nicotine pretreatments increased ETOH consumption to 148% of control intake, and high doses of nicotine decreased ETOH consumption. Both opiate antagonists, naloxone and naltrexone, produced dose-dependent decreases in ETOH consumption. The dopamine antagonist, haloperidol, produced dose- and time-dependent increases in voluntary ETOH consumption. The strain differences in voluntary ETOH consumption described in the present study differ from those previously described by other labs. We suggest that this strain-dependent disparity between laboratories, with respect to ETOH consumption/preference tasks, may reflect genetic differences in the preparedness to condition (learn) voluntary ETOH consumption rather than genetic differences in ETOH's reward/reinforcement attributes.

References (28)

  • H.H. Samson et al.

    Oral ethanol self-administration in the rat: Effect of naloxone

    Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.

    (1985)
  • H. Cappell et al.

    Tolerance to, and physical dependence on, ethanol: Why do we study them?

    Drug Alcohol Depend.

    (1979)
  • H. Cappell et al.

    Tolerance and physical dependence. Do they play a role in alcohol and drug self-administration?

  • G.I. Elmer et al.

    Ethanol self-administration in long sleep and short sleep mice indicates reinforcement is not inversely related to neurosensitivity

    J. Pharm. Exp. Ther.

    (1990)
  • Cited by (54)

    • Evidence for incentive salience sensitization as a pathway to alcohol use disorder

      2019, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
      Citation Excerpt :

      Similarly, rodents bred for greater sensitivity to some of the appetitive conditioning effects of alcohol tend to be more sensitive to its other appetitive conditioning effects ((Ciccocioppo et al., 2001, 1999; Murphy et al., 1989; Oster et al., 2006; Toalston et al., 2008), but see: (Stewart et al., 1996)), and more importantly, tend to exhibit LS-like phenotypes (Agabio et al., 2001; Colombo et al., 1998; Murphy et al., 2002; Päivärinta and Korpi, 1993; Waller et al., 1986). There is also some support for this covariation in rodent populations that were not selected for one trait or the other ((Chappell and Weiner, 2008; Spuhler and Deitrich, 1984), but see: (Gauvin et al., 1993; Khanna et al., 1990)). More extensive testing of this covariation is warranted in non-human animals, especially using paradigms that measure different facets of IS attribution to alcohol cues.

    • Can low-level ethanol exposure during pregnancy influence maternal care? An investigation using two strains of rat across two generations

      2015, Physiology and Behavior
      Citation Excerpt :

      Genetic variations between strains of rats may influence response to certain tests [40]. Additionally, rat strains have been shown to differ both in voluntary ethanol consumption [41] and in the effects of gestational stress on LG behavior [42]. For translational research purposes, it is vital to verify the validity of results, at least across different strains of the same species.

    • Early ethanol and water intake: Choice mechanism and total fluid regulation operate in parallel in male alcohol preferring (p) and both wistar and sprague dawley rats

      2014, Physiology and Behavior
      Citation Excerpt :

      The aim of the present study was to characterize early drinking of ethanol, water and total fluid by P rat, with Wistar and Sprague Dawley (SD) non-selected albino rats serving as comparison lines. Wistar is the parental line of the P rat whereas SD is a non-related line, yet both have shown previously similar levels of ethanol intake under certain conditions [18,19]. Our protocol followed the general timeline of a drinking test used for P-rat selective breeding.

    • The effects of pre-pubertal gonadectomy and binge-like ethanol exposure during adolescence on ethanol drinking in adult male and female rats

      2011, Behavioural Brain Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      The total amount of time each animal displayed LORR was also recorded. When the males (n = 49) and a subset of the females (n = 45) reached P100, they were trained to drink ethanol using a modified sucrose-fading procedure [23,67]. Daily drinking sessions took place in a separate drinking chamber that was comparable to the rats’ home cages and the enclosures used during binge-like ethanol exposure.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text