Is working memory capacity task dependent?

https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(89)90040-5Get rights and content

Abstract

The complex span measure of working memory is a word/digit span measured while performing a secondary task. Two experiments investigated whether correlations between the complex span and reading comprehension depend on the nature of the secondary task and individual skill in that task. The secondary task did not have to be reading related for the span to predict reading comprehension. An arithmetic-related secondary task led to correlations with reading comprehension similar to those found when the secondary task was reading. The relationship remained significant when quantitative skills were factored out of the complex span/comprehension correlations. Simple digit and word spans (measured without a background task) did not correlate with reading comprehension and SAT scores. The second experiment showed that the complex span/comprehension correlations were a function of the difficulty of the background task. When the difficulty level of the reading-related or arithmetic-related background tasks was moderate, the span/comprehension correlations were higher in magnitude than when the background tasks were very simple, or, were very difficult.

References (43)

  • A.D. Baddeley et al.

    Working memory

  • A.D. Baddeley et al.

    Spatial working memory

  • A.D. Baddeley et al.

    Word length and the structure of short-term memory

    Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior

    (1975)
  • D.E. Broadbent

    Perception and communication

    (1958)
  • P.A. Carpenter et al.

    The role of working memory in language comprehension

  • R. Case

    Mental strategies, mental capacity, and instruction: A neo-Piageitan investigation

    Journal of Experimental Child Psychology

    (1974)
  • W.G. Chase et al.

    Skill and working memory

  • V. Coltheart

    The effects of acoustic and semantic similarity on concept identification

    Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

    (1972)
  • M. Daneman et al.

    Individual differences in integrating information between and within sentences

    Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition

    (1983)
  • M. Daneman et al.

    Working memory and reading skill re-examined

  • W.N. Francis et al.
  • Cited by (0)

    These studies were part of a dissertation submitted to the University of South Carolina by Marilyn L. Turner. The research was supported by AFOSR Grant 870069 to Randall W. Engle.

    View full text