1995 Special issue article
Composition of biosonar images for target recognition by echolocating bats

https://doi.org/10.1016/0893-6080(95)00059-3Get rights and content

Abstract

Echolocating bats can recognize flying insects as sonar targets in a variety of different acoustic situations ranging from open spaces to dense clutter. Target classification must depend on perceiving images whose dimensions can tolerate intrusion of additional echoes from other objects, even echoes arriving at about the same time as those from the insect, without disrupting image organization. The big brown bat, Eptesicus fuscus, broadcasts FM sonar sounds in the 15–100 kHz band and perceives the arrival-time of echoes with an accuracy of 10–15 ns and a two-point resolution of 2 μs, which suggests that perception of fine detail on the dimension of echo delay or target range is the basis for reconstructing complex acoustic scenes and recognizing targets that are embedded in these scenes. The directionality of the bat's sonar sound is very broad, making it impossible to isolate echoes from individual targets merely by aiming the head and ears at one object instead of another. Consequently, segregation of targets must depend on isolating their echoes as discrete events along the axis of delay. That is, the bat's images must correspond to impulse responses of target scenes. However, the bat's sonar broadcasts are several milliseconds long, and the integration time of echo reception is about 350 μs, so perception of separate delays for multiple echoes only a few microseconds apart requires deconvolution of spectrally-complex echoes that overlap and interfere with each other within the 350-μs integration time. The bat's auditory system encodes the FM sweeps of transmissions and echoes as half-wave-rectified, magnitude-unsquared spectrograms, and then registers the time that elapses between each frequency in the broadcast and the echo, effectively correlating the spectrograms. The interference patterns generated by overlap of multiple echoes are then used to modify these delay estimates by adding fine details of the delay structure of echoes. This is equivalent to transformation of the spectrograms into the time domain, or deconvolution of echo spectra by spectrogram correlation and transformation (SCAT). However, while deconvolution overcomes integration time, the bat's receiving antennas reverberate for about 100 μs, smearing the echoes upon arrival. The bat overcomes this problem by receiving echoes from different directions than the transmitted sound, which radiates from the mouth. The broad range of antenna reverberations common to the emission and echoes thus cancel out, leaving only narrow elevation-dependent differences, which in fact appear in the bat's images. The SCAT algorithms successfully recreate images comparable to those perceived by the bat and provide for classification of targets from their glint structure in different situations.

References (41)

  • D.R. Griffin et al.

    Target discrimination by the echolocation of bats

    Journal of Experimental Zoology

    (1965)
  • D.J. Hartley et al.

    The sound emission pattern of the echolocating bat, Eptesicus juscus

    Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

    (1989)
  • O.W. Henson

    The ear and audition

  • P.H.S. Jen et al.

    Directionality of sound pressure transformation at the pinna of echolocating bats

    Hearing Research

    (1988)
  • S.A. Kick

    Target detection by the echolocating bat, Eptesicus fuscus

    Journal of Comparative Physiology

    (1982)
  • S.A. Kick et al.

    Automatic gain control in the bat's sonar receiver and the neuroethology of echolocation

    Journal of the Neuroscience

    (1984)
  • R. Kober et al.

    Information in sonar echoes of fluttering insects available for echolocating bats

    Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

    (1990)
  • A. Kurta et al.

    Eptesicus fuscus

    Mammalian Species

    (1990)
  • G. Langner et al.

    Periodicity coding in the inferior colliculus of the cat: I. Neuronal mechanisms

    Journal of Neurophysiology

    (1988)
  • B.D. Lawrence et al.

    Measurements of atmospheric attenuation at ultrasonic frequencies and the significance for echolocation by bats

    Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

    (1982)
  • Cited by (52)

    • Recovery cycles of single-on and double-on neurons in the inferior colliculus of the leaf-nosed bat, Hipposideros armiger

      2011, Brain Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Based on the sonogram of their ultrasonic signals, these bats can be classified as frequency modulation (FM) bats, constant frequency–frequency modulation (CF–FM) bats and click bats (Neuweiler, 2003). These bats occupy different ecological niches to hunt prey and avoid obstacles using echolocation (Simmons et al., 1995). During hunting, these bats systematically vary the pulse parameters as they search, approach, and finally intercept insects or negotiate obstacles (Griffin, 1958; Jen and Kamada, 1982; Simmons et al., 1979; Surlykke and Moss, 2000).

    • Bat echolocation processing using first-spike latency coding

      2009, Neural Networks
      Citation Excerpt :

      To verify that the relevant HRTF-induced spectral cues are well represented by the proposed spike-time code, we use the outputs of the proposed model to do regression on the azimuth and elevation of both simple targets, as well as fluttering insects. FM-bats emit a broadband FM sweep and analyse the received echoes to construct an acoustic image of their environment (Simmons, Saillant, Wotton, Haresign, & Ferragamo, 1995). A simplified version of an emitted pulse e.g., as used by the bat Eptesicus fuscus (Surlykke & Moss, 2000), is shown in Fig. 1(a) in its time–pressure representation and in Fig. 1(b) in its time-frequency representation.

    • Understanding auditory distance estimation by humpback whales: A computational approach

      2008, Behavioural Processes
      Citation Excerpt :

      Instead, lower frequencies typically are resolved more precisely than higher frequencies. Physiologically- and perceptually-based analysis techniques have been developed for analyses of human speech (Cooke et al., 1993; Pitton et al., 1996), and occasionally have been applied to the study of animals (Altes, 1995; Fletcher, 1992; Roitblat et al., 1996; Simmons et al., 1995). Knowledge of the auditory physiology underlying production and reception of sounds has also been incorporated into representations of sounds produced by whales and dolphins (Branstetter and Mercado, 2006; Branstetter et al., 2007; Mercado, 1998; Mercado and Kuh, 1998).

    • Exploiting the Phase of a Bio-inspired Receiver

      2021, IEEE National Radar Conference - Proceedings
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text