Sex-related hormonal influences on pain and analgesic responses
Section snippets
Overview
The experience of pain is sculpted by multiple biological and psychosocial contributions. Indeed, there is substantial interindividual variability in responses to painful stimuli as well as responses to analgesic medications. One set of biopsychosocial variables whose influence on pain and analgesic responses has received considerable attention in recent years is sex- and gender-related factors. Specifically, several recent reviews indicate that both experimental and clinical pain responses
Hormonal influences on pain and analgesia
Gonadal hormones naturally fluctuate across the female menstrual cycle (discussed below). The analog to the human menstrual cycle in rodents is the estrous cycle, which is typically broken down into four stages: (1) metestrus, during which progesterone is elevated while estrogen and LH levels are low; (2) diestrus, characterized by relatively high levels of LH, increasing estrogen and decreasing progesterone; (3) proestrus, during which estrogen, progesterone, LH and FSH peak; and (4) estrus,
Human menstrual cycle physiology
The human female menstrual cycle is accompanied by a broad array of hormonal alterations, which produce wide ranging effects in both peripheral and central nervous system (CNS) structures (Fig. 1). Two gonadotropic hormones, follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH), secreted by the pituitary gland control the female menstrual cycle. During the postmenstrual “follicular” phase of the cycle, both FSH and LH are secreted at relatively steady, low-to-moderate levels. Also,
Potential mechanisms underlying hormonal effects on pain and analgesia
The precise neuroanatomy and neurochemistry of pain processing is still far from established. Historically, theories of pain transmission have emphasized ascending pathways in which primary afferent nerve fibers activate neurons in the spinal cord and brainstem, which then simply relay the information to higher brain structures. More recently, the importance of central nervous system pain-modulatory systems has been recognized, and some investigators have proposed that the certain forms of
Clinical implications
The reviewed literature clearly demonstrates that sex-related factors, including gonadal hormones, produce multiple peripheral and central effects that can influence pain modulation; however, the practical import of these effects has yet to be determined. While it is possible that the effects of sex steroids on pain transmission are minimal compared to the influence of other factors, we believe that the potential clinical implications are substantial. First, menstrual cycle-related symptoms are
Summary and conclusions
The literature reviewed above clearly indicates that sex-related factors, including gonadal hormones, influence nociceptive processing and analgesic responses. The presence of contradictory findings can be partially attributed to multiple methodologic factors, including strain differences, timing of assessments in relation to hormonal cycling, and nociceptive assays used. It is also important to note that sex-related factors represent only one set of variables that can influence pain responses
Conclusions
- 1.
Sex steroids affect both peripheral and CNS pathways involved in nociceptive processing. The studies reviewed above depict the far-reaching effects of gonadal hormones both centrally and peripherally. The magnitude of these effects and the role that they play in the pathophysiology of clinical pain remains to be determined.
- 2.
The effects of gonadal hormones account partially but not completely for the differences in pain sensitivity between males and females. Meta-analytic reviews from human
Recommendations
- 1.
Investigators should determine menstrual cycle phase in pain-related studies. Historically, women were eschewed in biomedical research, partly based on assumptions that results derived from men were generalizable to women. When this proved an invalid assumption, the vagaries of controlling for the pesky female menstrual cycle were used as an excuse to exclude women (and female rats). While the menstrual cycle does present important challenges to biomedical research, it also provides rich
Acknowledgements
Supported by DE12261 (RBF) and DK51413 (TJN)
References (178)
Sex differences in pain
Behav Brain Sci
(1997)- et al.
Gender differences in the responses to noxious stimuli
Pain Forum
(1995) - et al.
Sex differences in the perception of noxious experimental stimuli: a meta-analysis
Pain
(1998) Gender variations in clinical pain experience
Pain
(1996)Gender considerations in the epidemiology of chronic pain
Survey of pain in the United States: the nuprin pain report
Clin J Pain
(1986)- et al.
The relationship of sex and clinical pain to experimental pain responses
Pain
(1999) - et al.
Pain in young adults: I. Relationship to gender and family pain history
Clin J Pain
(1994) - et al.
Interactions among aging, gender, and gonadectomy effects upon morphine antinociception in rats
Physiol Behav
(1993) - et al.
Gender effects and central opioid analgesia
Pain
(1991)