Multi-electrode stimulation and recording in the isolated retina
Introduction
The last decade has seen increasing interest in the development of retina-based visual prostheses which might someday restore partial vision to patients blinded by photoreceptor diseases like retinitis pigmentosa and macular degeneration (Chow and Chow, 1997, Eckmiller, 1997, Rizzo and Wyatt, 1997, Humayun et al., 1999, Zrenner et al., 1999). The long-term success of such devices will be tied to our understanding of how retinal neurons and networks are activated when extracellular electric stimuli are applied to the retinal surface.
There is a substantial and diverse literature devoted to electric stimulation of the retina. Current research is directed at retinal prosthesis development while earlier efforts were aimed at understanding fundamental retinal processing using a novel type of input. In the majority of these studies, electric stimuli were delivered through conventional electrodes having one or two conductors at the end of an elongated probe. Electrodes of this type offer a fairly limited choice of active stimulating geometry — typically a central point or disk, optionally surrounded by a concentric ring. Furthermore, they are not well-suited to measuring a neuron's excitation thresholds at a number of different stimulating electrode positions. When our group performed such experiments (Jensen et al., 1996, Rizzo et al., 1997), we found it necessary to raise and re-lower the stimulating electrode between measurements in order to reduce the likelihood of dragging the retina. Dragging was undesirable because it could introduce electrode placement imprecision or “loss” of a neuron which had been inadvertently moved away from the recording electrode. The possibility of dragging could not be completely eliminated, however, since the stimulating electrode had to be physically moved between threshold measurements.
Mechanical disruption of the retina may be avoided by using a multi-electrode array instead of a conventional electrode (Kuras and Gutmanien≐, 1997, Greenberg, 1998). Stimulus positions and geometries are controlled by the choice of stimulator connections to the array, allowing for rapid switching among a large number of active configurations. Photolithographic techniques, which have been used in electrophysiology research since the 1970s (Pickard, 1979), make it possible to pattern these arrays with essentially arbitrary electrode geometries and distributions. Application of electrode arrays to the study of retina, moreover, has recently been demonstrated in amphibians and mammals (Meister et al., 1994, DeVries and Baylor, 1997).
This paper describes a method to stimulate and record from neurons in isolated retinas using a planar, photo-lithographically patterned multi-electrode array. To demonstrate a practical application of the method, results from a number of physiologic measurements are presented and discussed. These also motivate a discussion of the method's strengths and drawbacks.
Section snippets
In vitro preparation
The preparation described below is quite general and has been used to study retinas from several species. For clarity, results will be presented only for rabbits, in which the majority of work was conducted.
Retinas were prepared for study as follows. Female Dutch Belted rabbits, weighing 2–2.5 kg, were sedated by intramuscular injection of ketamine (35 mg/kg) and xylazine (5 mg/kg). The rabbits were then sacrificed by an intravenous overdose of sodium pentobarbitol. Immediately following death,
Electrode array design
The electrode arrays were formed by patterning a series of conducting and insulating layers on a rigid glass substrate measuring 0.8×24.4×40.9 mm. Electrodes were 10 μm-diameter disks and could be used for either stimulation or recording. In most cases, half of the electrodes were used for stimulation and the other half for recording (see Fig. 1).
Data acquisition
The data acquisition system consists of: (1) a voltage-controlled current source stimulator, with monitor amplifiers to measure the stimulus current and voltage; (2) an eight-channel nerve response amplifier, consisting of a pre-amplifier board located near the retina preparation and a rack-mounted high gain amplifier; (3) a Pentium computer with analog/digital interfaces; (4) a four-channel oscilloscope; (5) a speaker. The block-diagram in Fig. 3 illustrates the connection scheme for these
Spontaneous and light-evoked activity
Varying amounts of nerve activity were discernible in the voltage signals at the response amplifier outputs, with spontaneous activity present on most recording sites. Spontaneously active sites produced signals consisting of a time series of discrete discharges, ranging in frequency from below one discharge/s up to several tens of discharges/s, superimposed on the baseline noise.
The discharges were judged to be single unit action potentials from ganglion cells or their axons (or possibly
Stimulation
Spikes were generated by the cathodic phase at threshold. This result fits with expectations since an extracellular cathode produces a strong localized depolarization whereas an extracellular anode produces a relatively diffuse and weak depolarization (Ranck, 1975, Rattay, 1986). Since thresholds did not depend on initial current polarity (for a 400 μs intra-phase delay) we could freely choose the stimulation phase order without loss of generality. Anodic-first stimuli were used because they
Conclusion
We have described a method for electrically stimulating and recording from retinal neurons using a multi-electrode array, and illustrated basic properties of the responses thereby obtained. One of the primary strengths of this method was illustrated in the examples of Fig. 8, Fig. 9, where excitation thresholds for a number of different electrode configurations were rapidly measured without any mechanical disruption of the retina preparation. A second strength of this method is the great
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge helpful discussions with Tom Weiss and Donald Eddington, as well as Doug Shire for microfabrication wizardry.
References (32)
- et al.
Subretinal electrical stimulation of the rabbit retina
Neurosci. Lett.
(1997) - et al.
Pattern electrical stimulation of the human retina
Vis. Res.
(1999) - et al.
Multi-channel metallic electrode for threshold stimulation of frog's retina
J. Neurosci. Methods
(1997) - et al.
Multi-neuronal signals from the retina: acquisition and analysis
J. Neurosci. Methods
(1994) - et al.
A neural interface for a cortical vision prosthesis
Vis. Res.
(1999) A review of printed circuit microelectrodes and their production
J. Neurosci. Methods
(1979)Which elements are excited in electrical stimulation of mammalian central nervous system: a review
Brain Res.
(1975)- et al.
Sealing cultured invertebrate neurons to embedded dish electrodes facilitates long-term stimulation and recording
J. Neurosci. Methods
(1989) - et al.
Can subretinal microphotodiodes successfully replace degenerated photoreceptors?
Vis. Res.
(1999) - et al.
Responses to acetylcholine of ganglion cells in an isolated mammalian retina
J. Neurophysiol.
(1976)
In vitro retina as an experimental model of the central nervous system
J. Neurochem.
Neurotransmission in central nervous tissue: a study of isolated rabbit retina
J. Neurophysiol.
Quantitative morphology of rabbit retinal ganglion cells
Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B
New properties of rabbit retinal ganglion cells
J. Physiol.
The electrical stimulation of the retina by indwelling electrodes
Investigative Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.
Mosaic arrangement of ganglion cell receptive fields in rabbit retina
J. Neurophysiol.
Cited by (149)
Conducting polymers for neuronal microelectrode array recording and stimulation
2018, Sensors and Actuators, B: ChemicalCitation Excerpt :The term MEA refers to a range of devices incorporating in vitro cell culture MEAs, to implantable in vivo devices, such as retinal implants. The architecture of these devices differs for each application, with the main differences in the (i) type of substrate and/or insulation material used (i.e. rigid for in vitro, flexible for in vivo) [12,13], (ii) size (iii) microelectrode material and (iv) microelectrode geometry. This review will address microelectrode design, with an emphasis on conducting polymer coatings, to improve recording performance, stimulation efficacy and performance stability of conventional microelectrode materials.
The potential of in vitro neuronal networks cultured on micro electrode arrays for biomedical research
2023, Progress in Biomedical EngineeringApplications of advanced technologies to retinal prosthesis
2023, Biomedical Engineering Principles Of The Bionic Man (Second Edition)Neuron matters: neuromodulation with electromagnetic stimulation must consider neurons as dynamic identities
2022, Journal of NeuroEngineering and RehabilitationFlexible ultrasound-induced retinal stimulating piezo-arrays for biomimetic visual prostheses
2022, Nature Communications