Research reportAre there gender differences in major depression and its response to antidepressants?
Introduction
Women are at higher risk to develop depressive disorders than are men. Empirical investigations over a period of more than 20 years have demonstrated that women are typically twice as likely to develop depressive disorders than men are (Weissman and Klerman, 1977, Kessler et al., 1993, Weissman et al., 1993), although this ratio has been reported to vary across different types of depressive disorders (Perugi et al., 1990). For example, while women are two times more likely to develop a single episode unipolar depression, they are four times more likely to develop recurrent unipolar depression (Perugi et al., 1990). These ratios have been reported in a wide range of patient and non-patient populations, including clinical and community samples with major depression, and community samples with sub-threshold depressive symptoms (e.g., Weissman and Klerman, 1977, Oldehinkel et al., 1999).
While the preponderance of women suffering from depressive disorders is well-established and frequently replicated, considerably less attention has been given to gender differences in the presentation and features of depression. This related line of research has attempted to determine empirically whether, and in what specific aspects, depression in men differs from depression in women (Angst and Dobler-Mikola, 1984, Frank et al., 1988, Perugi et al., 1990, Thase et al., 1994, Kornstein et al., 1995Derogatis, 1992, Derogatis, 1992, Derogatis, 1992, Rapaport et al., 1995, Zlotnik et al., 1996, Simpson et al., 1997, Bracke, 1998, Silverstein, 1999). Gender differences have been reported in severity and symptoms of depression, course of illness, and treatment response in some of these studies, while other studies reported negative results. Few studies have also examined the differences in the personality traits of depressed men and women. However, these studies differ considerably in terms of the population sampled, which may have contributed to inconsistent findings across these different studies. For example, while some studies have investigated community samples of individuals with sub-threshold clinical depression (e.g., Angst and Dobler-Mikola, 1984, Bracke, 1998), other studies have included depressed patients meeting full diagnostic criteria (e.g., Thase et al., 1994, Fava et al., 1996, Silverstein, 1999). Several clinical studies have included both unipolar and bipolar depressed patients (Frank et al., 1988, Perugi et al., 1990, Rapaport et al., 1995, Croughan et al., 1988; Simpson et al., 1997), which are likely to have contributed to inconsistent findings. Other studies have investigated quite narrowly defined populations, such as samples with chronic depression (i.e., longer than 2 years) (Kornstein et al., 1995Derogatis, 1992, Derogatis, 1992, Derogatis, 1992), recurrent depression (i.e., at least two previous episodes) (Frank et al., 1988), or pure depression (i.e., exclusion of individuals with comorbid Axis I disorders) (Sotsky et al., 1991, Kornstein et al., 1995, Zlotnik et al., 1996).
One goal of this paper was to review systematically the literature on gender differences and depression with respect to symptoms, severity, course of illness, personality, and treatment response, with particular attention to the different populations sampled. As none of the reviewed studies examined all of these variables in a single sample, resulting, perhaps, in inconsistent findings, a second goal was to investigate all of these potential factors related to gender differences in depression in one sample of unipolar depressed patients receiving antidepressant treatment. We believe that such an analysis provides a more cohesive and meaningful depiction of gender and depression, at least for those depressed persons receiving treatment.
In a community sample of individuals with dysphoric mood, Angst and Dobler-Mikola (1984) found that women reported more appetite and sleep disturbances, while men reported more psychomotor changes, feelings of worthlessness, and decreased concentration. Silverstein (1999) reported that clinically depressed women in the general population exhibited a higher number of somatic symptoms including fatigue, sleep and appetite disturbance. Accordingly, in clinical in- and outpatient populations, women were reported to be more likely to have vegetative and/or atypical symptoms such as increased appetite, weight gain, and sleep disturbance (Frank et al., 1988, Perugi et al., 1990, Young et al., 1990). Clinically depressed women were also reported to show higher levels of anxiety and somatization (Frank et al., 1988, Perugi et al., 1990, Kornstein et al., 1995Derogatis, 1992, Derogatis, 1992), as well as anger (Frank et al., 1988) and psychomotor retardation (Kornstein et al., 1995Derogatis, 1992, Derogatis, 1992). One study of clinically depressed individuals reported that men are more likely to endorse weight loss (Frank et al., 1988). A study of recurrently depressed individuals that weighed patients during and between episodes only found a trend toward men losing more weight than women (Stunkard et al., 1990).
Women with clinical depression may tend to experience a greater severity of depressive symptoms (Frank et al., 1988, Perugi et al., 1990, Thase et al., 1994, Kornstein et al., 1995Derogatis, 1992, Derogatis, 1992). Women with sub-threshold depression have also been reported to endorse a greater overall number of depressive symptoms (Angst and Dobler-Mikola, 1984, Bracke, 1998). Other clinical studies failed to find a gender difference in depression severity (Croughan et al., 1988, Young et al., 1990, Fava et al., 1996, Bothwell and Scott, 1997). Perugi et al. (1990) pointed out that gender differences are especially prominent in the self-reported severity of depressive symptoms as compared to interview-based measures of depression severity. Accordingly, Frank et al. (1988) and Kornstein et al. (2000a) reported that women presented as more severely depressed than men on the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI; Beck, 1978), while this difference was absent on the clinician-rated Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD; Hamilton, 1967).
Some studies reported that women have an earlier age of onset of the first depressive episode (Ernst and Angst, 1992, Kornstein et al., 1995Derogatis, 1992, Derogatis, 1992, Fava et al., 1996), whereas other studies found no difference (Amenson and Lewinsohn, 1981, Frank et al., 1988, Perugi et al., 1990, Thase et al., 1994, Rapaport et al., 1995, Simpson et al., 1997). In community samples, it was found that depression in women is more likely to develop into a recurrent course (Amenson and Lewinsohn, 1981, Ernst and Angst, 1992, Bracke, 1998). However, most studies using clinical samples do not find a gender difference in the number of previous depressive episodes (Frank et al., 1988, Winokur et al., 1993, Kornstein et al., 1995Derogatis, 1992, Derogatis, 1992, Bothwell and Scott, 1997). In addition, depression in women has been reported to be more chronic in community samples (Sargeant et al., 1990, Bracke, 1998) and in patients with pure depression (i.e., without comorbid Axis I disorders) (Keitner et al., 1991). However, again this gender effect in chronicity of depression was absent in other clinical studies (e.g., Amenson and Lewinsohn, 1981, Perugi et al., 1990, Winokur et al., 1993, Kornstein et al., 1995Derogatis, 1992, Derogatis, 1992, Rush et al., 1995). Moreover, in a prospective study following patients with a first episode of major depression for 15 years, Simpson et al. (1997) found no evidence of a more chronic or recurrent course in women.
Gender may be an important variable in understanding variability of response to antidepressant treatment. There is some evidence that women respond more poorly than men to tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), with imipramine studied the most. For example, Frank et al. (1988) reported that men with recurrent major depression have a more rapid and sustained response to imipramine than women. In a recent study, Kornstein et al. (2000b) found that chronically depressed men responded more favourably to imipramine than women, while women showed a more favourable response to sertraline [a selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor (SSRI)] than men. Haykal and Akiskal (1999) further found that females diagnosed with dysthymia and treated with fluoxetine (another SSRI) had higher response rates compared to men. Davidson and Pelton (1986) investigated a sample of depressed individuals with comorbid panic attacks, and found that monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) were superior to TCAs in women, while TCAs were superior to MAOIs in men. These differential findings have been related to gender differences in drug absorption, bioavailability, drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination. However, a number of other studies indicate that men and women are equally likely to respond to TCAs, including imipramine (Croughan et al., 1988, Sotsky et al., 1991, Zlotnik et al., 1996) and amitriptyline (Croughan et al., 1988, Paykel et al., 1988). There is a shortage of clinical trials comparing the response of men and women with major depression to antidepressants other than TCAs.
A number of personality features have been proposed as vulnerability factors for the development and maintenance of depression. These include neuroticism, introversion, interpersonal dependency, self-criticism, and perfectionism. All of these features have been reported to be more prominent in depressed individuals than in controls (Hirschfeld et al., 1984, Klein et al., 1988, Franche and Dobson, 1992, Bagby et al., 1994, Bagby et al., 1995, Enns and Cox, 1997). In addition, from a cognitive perspective, Beck (1983) proposed that the cognitive styles of autonomy and sociotropy predispose individuals to develop depression. Autonomy, which is related to the constructs of self-criticism and perfectionism, refers to excessive achievement expectations and a strong need for independence. Sociotropy, which is related to interpersonal dependency, refers to a strong need for affiliation and support from others. According to Beck (1983), as a result of socialization, women are more likely to develop sociotropic structures, while men are more likely to develop autonomous structures. This hypothesis was empirically confirmed in a university student sample (Robins et al., 1994). Only very few studies addressed the issue of gender differences in these personality variables in clinically depressed samples. In recovered depressed patients, Hirschfeld et al. (1984) failed to find an effect of gender on interpersonal dependency, and Zlotnick et al. (1996) failed to find gender differences in need for approval and perfectionism as measured by the Dysfunctional Attitude Scale (DAS; Weissman and Beck, 1978). Bothwell and Scott (1997) found acutely depressed men and women to have comparable scores in neuroticism. Perugi et al. (1990) reported that clinically depressed women were significantly more likely to have a ‘depressive temperament’, which includes features of self-criticism and preoccupation with inadequacy and failure. One problem of all studies investigating personality and acute depression, and a usual criticism of such investigations, is the potential influence of depressed mood on personality scores. However, while the finding of absolute change (i.e., the extent to which mean personality scores change or increase/decrease in the context of a depressive episode) of certain personality measures as a function of change in depression is well-established, relative stability (i.e., the extent to which the relative differences on personality scores among a group of individuals remain constant in the context of a depressive episode) has been demonstrated for a number of traits including neuroticism and extraversion (Santor et al., 1997), as well as sociotropy and autonomy (Bagby et al., 2001). Thus, there is mounting evidence that personality measures do have stability in the context of changing mood and, therefore do confer vulnerability to depression independent of the state effects of depressed mood (Bagby and Ryder, 2000).
In summary, it appears quite possible that the contradictory findings in the presentation of major depression are a result of variation in sampling procedures. Research is needed to elucidate which gender differences can be generalized to a wide range of depressive populations. In the present analyses, we tried to address this issue by investigating gender differences in a sample of outpatients with major depression of varying levels of chronicity and recurrency who are receiving antidepressant treatment. While it may be more difficult to detect gender differences in such a heterogenous population, we believe that potential findings are more powerful as they are not limited to specific depressive subtypes, such as chronic, recurrent, or pure depression.
Section snippets
Subjects
A sample was drawn from a clinical database maintained at the Depression Clinic, Mood and Anxiety Division at the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH) (Toronto, Canada) (formerly the Clarke Institute of Psychiatry). The sample comprised 385 outpatients diagnosed with major depression (139 men and 246 women) who were treated with antidepressant medication from 1991 to 1996. All patients recruited into the clinical database were taken from referrals made by psychiatrists and general
Sample description
The ratio between depressed men and women in this sample was 1:1.8. As shown in Table 1, male and female depressed patients did not differ in terms of their age. Men and women were also equally likely to be single (43% vs. 39%), married/living together as if married (38% vs. 34%), or divorced/separated (18% vs. 23%). Male patients had a higher number of years of education and a higher socio–economic status.
Types of symptoms
Women reported more vegetative symptoms than men (Table 2). In particular, women reported
Discussion
The ratio of men and women in the present analyses (1:1.8) is consistent with the female preponderance in major depression reported in the literature (Weissman and Klerman, 1977, Kessler et al., 1993, Weissman et al., 1993, Oldehinkel et al., 1999). However, since data for the present analyses were collected in a treatment facility, one cannot rule out that this ratio is influenced by a potential gender difference in the willingness to seek treatment. The present analyses investigated gender
Conclusion
These analyses tried to elucidate which gender differences in unipolar depression previously reported for different, and partly quite narrowly defined, depressive populations can be generalized to outpatients with major depression of varying levels of chronicity and recurrency who are receiving antidepressant treatment. The preponderance of somatic symptoms and anger, along with a higher self-reported severity of illness in women appears to constitute a robust gender difference in major
References (66)
- et al.
Do the diagnostic criteria determine the sex ratio in depression?
J. Affect. Disord.
(1984) - et al.
Replicating the five factor model of personality in a psychiatric sample
Person. Indiv. Diff.
(1999) - et al.
The influence of cognitive variables on recovery in depressed inpatients
J. Affect. Disord.
(1997) - et al.
Sociodemographic and prior clinical course characteristics associated with treatment response in depressed patients
J. Psychiatry Res.
(1988) - et al.
Forms of atypical depression and their response to antidepressant drugs
Psychiatry Res.
(1986) - et al.
Gender differences in Axis I comorbidity among depressed outpatients
J. Affect. Disord.
(1996) - et al.
Personality and gender-related differences in depression
J. Affect. Disord.
(1984) - et al.
Sex and depression in the National Comorbidity Survey. I: lifetime prevalence, chronicity, and recurrence
J. Affect. Disord.
(1993) - et al.
Gender differences in chronic major and double depression
J. Affect. Disord.
(2000) - et al.
Predictors of therapeutic benefit from amitriptyline in mild depression: a general practice placebo-controlled trial
J. Affect. Disord.
(1988)
Clinical characteristics of outpatients with chronic major depression
J. Affect. Disord.
Sex differences in rates of depression: cross-national perspectives
J. Affect. Disord.
An investigation into the observed sex differences in prevalence of unipolar depression
J. Abnorm. Psychol.
Major depression and the self-criticism and dependency personality dimensions
Am. J. Psychiatry
Major depression and the five-factor model of personality
J. Pers. Dis.
Confirmatory factor analysis of revised Personal Style Inventory (PSI)
Assessment
Personality and affective disorders: past efforts, current models, future directions
Curr. Psychiatry Reports
The stability and validity of the sociotropy and autonomy personality dimensions
Cogn. Ther. Res.
Depression Inventory
Cognitive therapy of depression of depression: new perspectives
Dependency and self-criticism: psychological dimensions of depression
J. Consult. Clin. Psychol.
The 1981 socio–economic index for occupations in Canada
Can. Rev. Sociol. Anthropol.
Sex differences in the course of depression: evidence from a longitudinal study of a representative sample of the Belgian population
Soc. Psychiatry Psychiatr. Epidemiol.
Gender differences in responses to depressed mood in a college sample
Sex Roles
Statistical Power Analysis For the Behavioural Sciences
The NEO Personality Inventory Manual
Normal personality assessment in the clinical practice: the NEO personality inventory
Psychol. Assess.
The SCL-90-R, brief symptom inventory, and matching clinical rating scales
Personality domains and depression: review and commentary
Can. J. Psychiatry
The Zurich Study, XII: sex differences in depression: evidence from longitudinal epidemiologic data
Eur. Arch. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci.
Gender differences in personality: a meta-analysis
Psychol. Bull.
Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders
Cited by (70)
Clinical and epidemiological predictors of treatment-resistant depression
2022, Managing Treatment-Resistant Depression: Road to Novel TherapeuticsLarge-Scale Transcriptomics Studies Provide Insight Into Sex Differences in Depression
2022, Biological PsychiatryCitation Excerpt :Findings suggest that there are sex differences in antidepressant treatment response, but the evidence is not as striking as for the sex difference in MDD incidence. For instance, some studies report that monoamine oxidase inhibitors and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors may be more effective in female patients (15–17), while male patients respond more favorably to tricyclic antidepressants (17,18) and ketamine (19) [but see (15,20–22)]. Psychotherapy appears similarly effective in men and women (23–26), though women may engage more in psychotherapy (27–30).
A synaptic locus for TrkB signaling underlying ketamine rapid antidepressant action
2021, Cell ReportsCitation Excerpt :This requirement for BDNF and TrkB in CA1 for ketamine’s antidepressant action, similar to the requirement for postsynaptic BDNF and TrkB at CA3-CA1 synapses in the augmented synaptic potentiation, were observed in both male and female mice. Although depression is more prevalent in females, the response to traditional antidepressants is similar to both sexes (Gorman, 2006; Grigoriadis and Robinson, 2007; Scheibe et al., 2003; Sloan and Kornstein, 2003). Clinical studies have not reported gender differences to ketamine’s antidepressant effects but more work is needed to directly address this question.
Sex differences in depressive symptoms and their networks in a treatment-seeking population – a cross-sectional study
2021, Journal of Affective DisordersMale rats with same-sex preference show higher immobility in the forced swim test, but similar effects of fluoxetine and desipramine than males that prefer females
2018, Pharmacology Biochemistry and BehaviorOpposite Molecular Signatures of Depression in Men and Women
2018, Biological Psychiatry