Elsevier

Neuroscience

Volume 119, Issue 4, 16 July 2003, Pages 1085-1101
Neuroscience

Effects of trigeminal ganglion stimulation on unit activity of ventral cochlear nucleus neurons

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4522(03)00207-0Get rights and content

Abstract

The trigeminal ganglion sends a projection to the granule and magnocellular regions of the ventral cochlear nucleus (VCN; [J Comp Neurol 419 (2000) 271]), as well as to the cochlea ([Neuroscience 79 (1997) 605; Neuroscience 84 (1998a) 559]). We investigated the effects of electrically stimulating the trigeminal ganglion on unit responses in the guinea-pig VCN. Responses consisted of one, two or more phases of excitation, sometimes followed by a longer inhibitory phase. The latencies to the first excitation peak ranged between 5 and 17 ms from the onset of stimulation. These responses were preceded by a slow wave potential evoked by the stimulation. Applying kainic acid, which eliminates VIIIth nerve responses, diminished the firing rates of VCN units to trigeminal stimulation, and increased their first spike latencies. Cochlear destruction had a similar effect. The responses in VCN evoked by trigeminal ganglion stimulation therefore appear to result from direct stimulation of the trigeminal ganglion—cochlear nucleus pathway, as well as modulation by the trigeminal ganglion—cochlear pathway. Alternatively, a reduction in spontaneous rate of VCN neurons by removal of VIIIth nerve input could explain the decreased response to trigeminal stimulation after cochlear manipulations. The modulation of firing rate in second order auditory neurons by first order somatosensory neurons could influence central auditory targets and may be involved in generating or modulating perceptions of phantom sounds which can be modified by manipulations of somatic regions of the head and neck (“somatic tinnitus”).

Section snippets

Experimental procedures

Experiments were performed on 40 healthy female, adult pigmented guinea-pigs (National Institutes of Health outbred strain) with normal Preyer's reflexes, weighing 250–350 g. All procedures were performed in accordance with the NIH guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals (NIH publication no. 80-23), and guidelines provided by the University of Michigan. These guidelines minimise the number of animals used and their suffering.

Vcn unit responses to trigeminal ganglion stimulation

Results are based on responses from 410 units. All the responses were sorted using principal component analysis to remove the artifact (Fig. 3A). Of the sorted responses approximately 2/3 were considered multi-unit. The remaining 1/3 were considered single unit responses. For these units, trigeminal ganglion stimulation elicited primarily excitatory responses from VCN neurons. Scatter plots of unit response rates as a function of location in the VCN are shown for one level of current applied to

Activation of VCN neurons by trigeminal ganglion stimulation

Electrical stimulation of the trigeminal ganglion resulted primarily in excitation, sometimes followed by inhibition, of VCN neurons, demonstrating a functional connection between the trigeminal nerve and the VCN. Previous studies have demonstrated that electrical stimulation of second-order somatosensory nuclei, the dorsal column and trigeminal nuclei, inhibited cells in the superficial and deep layers of DCN and excited cells in the VCN Saade et al., 1989, Young et al., 1995, Davis et al.,

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Mazy Bissinger for excellent histological reconstructions and to Chris Ellinger for invaluable electronic assistance. The center for neural communication technology (CNCT) in the Department of Engineering supplied the multichannel electrodes, and Sandy Bledsoe contributed valuable comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by grants from the American Tinnitus Association and NIH grant 5 R01 DC004825-03 awarded to S. Shore.

References (47)

  • S. Shore et al.

    Connections between the cochlear nuclei in the guinea pig

    Hear Res

    (1992)
  • S.E. Shore et al.

    Input to the cochlear granule cell domainsystems identified in the guinea pig by axonal transport

    Hear Res

    (1998)
  • C. Van den Honert et al.

    Physiological properties of the electrically stimulated auditory nerveII

    Single fiber recordings. Hear Res

    (1984)
  • Z. Vass et al.

    Capsaicin-induced release of substance P increases cochlear blood flow in the guinea pig

    Hear Res

    (1995)
  • Z. Vass et al.

    Direct evidence of trigeminal innervation of the cochlear blood vessels

    Neuroscience

    (1998)
  • Z. Vass et al.

    Trigeminal ganglion innervation of the cochleaa retrograde transport study

    Neuroscience

    (1997)
  • Z. Vass et al.

    Endolymphatic hydrops reduces trigeminal innervation to inner ear vasculature

    Exp Neurol

    (1998)
  • Z. Vass et al.

    Capsaicin stimulation of the cochlea and electric stimulation of the trigeminal ganglion mediate vascular permeability in cochlear and vertebro-basilar arteriesa potential cause of inner ear dysfunction in headache

    Neuroscience

    (2001)
  • R. Weinberg et al.

    A cuneocochlear pathway in the rat

    Neuroscience

    (1987)
  • Babalian, A, Jacomme, A, Doucet, J, Ryugo, DK, Rouiller, E (2002) Predominance of inhibitory actions in brainstem and...
  • T. Benson et al.

    Synaptic input to cochlear nucleus dendrites that receive medial olivocochlear synapses

    J Comp Neurol

    (1996)
  • M. Brown

    Fiber pathways and branching patterns of biocytin-labeled olivocochlear neurons in the mouse brainstem

    J Comp Neurol

    (1993)
  • M. Brown et al.

    Transneuronal labeling of cochlear nucleus neurons by HRP-labeled auditory nerve fibers and olivocochlear branches in mice

    J Comp Neurol

    (1992)
  • Cited by (66)

    • Lidocaine injections to the otic ganglion for the treatment of tinnitus—A pilot study

      2021, Progress in Brain Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Furthermore, projections from the somatosensory system to the inferior colliculus were detected. ( Shore et al., 2003, 2007). Changes in the firing rate of neurons of the cochlear nucleus seem to represent one mechanism by which the loudness of tinnitus is modulated in case of somatosensory tinnitus (Shore et al., 2007).

    • Multitarget surgical neuromodulation: Combined C2 and auditory cortex implantation for tinnitus

      2015, Neuroscience Letters
      Citation Excerpt :

      If TMS can transiently suppress the tinnitus, electrical stimulation through an electrode implanted on the same area can provide permanent tinnitus suppression [10–12,20]. The concept behind this approach is that the auditory cortex is involved in a pathologically functioning neuronal network which includes the frontal cortex, but also the parahippocampal area and insula [12,54], that generates tinnitus and that interference with this network activity by auditory cortex stimulation can alleviate tinnitus [17]. The same approach can be used for subcutaneous implantations in the C2 dermatoma.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text