Review
Smads as transcriptional co-modulators

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0955-0674(99)00081-2Get rights and content

Abstract

The Smad signalling pathway is critical for transmitting transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) superfamily signals from the cell surface to the nucleus. In the nucleus, Smads regulate transcriptional responses by recruiting co-activators and co-repressors to a wide array of DNA-binding partners. Thus, Smads function as transcriptional co-modulators to regulate TGFβ-dependent gene expression.

Introduction

The transforming growth factor β (TGFβ) superfamily is a large group of secreted polypeptide growth factors of which three subgroupings have been defined; the TGFβs, the activins and the bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs). Members of this family control aspects of early patterning, organogenesis and homeostasis, and disruption of TGFβ signalling is implicated in numerous human diseases. TGFβ, activins and BMPs all use type II and type I transmembrane Ser/Thr kinase receptors 1, 2, 3. Signalling is initiated when the ligand induces assembly of a heteromeric complex of type II and type I receptors. The type II kinase then phosphorylates the type I receptor in a conserved glycine–serine-rich domain (GS domain). This activates the type I kinase, which subsequently recognizes and phosphorylates members of the intracellular Smad signal transduction pathway.

Smads have recently emerged as members of a unique signalling pathway that functions downstream of Ser/Thr kinase receptors. Three classes of Smads have been defined: the receptor-regulated Smads (R-Smads); the co-Smad, Smad4; and the inhibitory Smads (I-Smads), Smad6 and Smad7 1, 2, 3, 4. The Smad family is highly conserved and homologues of each of these classes have been identified in Xenopus, Drosophila and Caenorhabditis elegans and are summarized in Figure 1. Activation of the Smad pathway occurs when the activated type I kinase associates with the MH2 domain of specific R-Smads (Figure 2). The type I kinase then phosphorylates the R-Smads on a conserved carboxy-terminal SSXS motif. This causes dissociation of the R-Smad from the receptor, stimulates the assembly of a heteromeric complex between the phosphorylated R-Smad and the Co-Smad, Smad4, and induces the nuclear accumulation of this heteromeric Smad complex. In the nucleus, Smads function to regulate transcriptional responses by directly interacting with a host of resident DNA binding proteins. Here, the R-Smads mediate the interaction of the Smad complex with DNA binding proteins. Once recruited to specific regulatory elements, Smads can then stabilize ternary DNA binding complexes by contacting DNA at adjacent sites and can directly regulate transcription by recruiting coactivators or corepressors to the promoter (see below). Thus, Smads function to transmit signals directly from the cell-surface receptors into the nucleus, where they act as effectors of the transcriptional response to TGFβ-related factors.

As substrates of Ser/Thr kinase receptors, the R-Smads play an important role in maintaining specificity in TGFβ pathways and recognition of different R-Smads by the type I kinase is highly specific 1, 2, 3, 4. Thus, the TGFβ and activin type I receptors, TβRI and ActRIB only activate Smad2 and Smad3, whereas the BMP type I receptors, ALK2, ALK3 and ALK6 all target Smad1, Smad5 and Smad8. In addition, ALK1, which may function as a TGFβ type I receptor in endothelial cells, also phosphorylates Smad1, 5 and 8. The R-Smads also play an important role in the nucleus in maintaining specificity of the transcriptional response by mediating interaction of the Smad complex with DNA binding partners, as discussed below. Thus, by associating with both the cell-surface receptor and the nuclear transcriptional machinery, R-Smads play an important role in maintaining the specificity of the biological response to ligand.

In contrast to the R-Smads and the co-Smads, the I-Smads function to block TGFβ and BMP signalling (reviewed in 1, 2, 5). These Smads form stable complexes with the activated receptors and inhibit signalling by preventing access and phosphorylation of the R-Smads. Smad7 inhibits both BMP and TGFβ receptors, whereas Smad6 appears to be relatively specific for the BMP pathway, although a truncated version lacking the amino terminus has been identified in endothelial cells and may be able to inhibit both pathways. In addition to inhibiting receptor function, Smad6 may also associate with phosphorylated Smad1, providing another mechanism to inhibit BMP signalling. Interestingly, transcription of Smad6 and Smad7 is induced by TGFβ, activin and BMP, providing a mechanism for negative feedback regulation of Smad signalling. In addition, Smad6 and Smad7 are regulated by epidermal growth factor (EGF) and interferon-γ (IFN-γ). In the case of IFN-γ this induction has been shown to mediate the ability of IFN-γ to antagonize TGFβ signalling in U4A cells [6].

Localization of Smad7 also appears to be under dynamic control. In the absence of signalling, Smad7 is nuclear but it accumulates in the cytosol when cells are stimulated with TGFβ [7]. Localization of Smad7 may also be controlled by other pathways, as plating cells on fibronectin or plastic substrata can lead to accumulation of Smad7 in the cytosol, and attachment to glass leads to a predominantly nuclear pattern [8]. However, what controls the nuclear localization and whether the interaction of Smad7 with the receptors is regulated is currently unknown.

Here we focus on recent insights into how the interaction of Smads with cytoplasmic or nuclear proteins regulates their activity and mediates their function as critical effectors of TGFβ superfamily signals.

Section snippets

Functional regions in Smads

Smads do not appear to contain any intrinsic enzymatic activity and they exert their effector functions in TGFβ and BMP signalling through protein–protein and protein–DNA interactions. Smad proteins contain three distinct regions, the highly conserved MH1 and MH2 domains (for Mad-homology 1 and 2, also known as N and C domains, respectively) and the intervening non-conserved linker region 1, 2, 3, 4. The MH2 domain mediates a large number of distinct protein–protein interactions that include:

A Drosophila activin-like signalling pathway

Work on the vertebrate Smad pathways has led to a model in which distinct pathways emanating from TGFβ/activin or BMP receptors mediate distinct biological responses to these classes of ligands. In Drosophila, while it was clear that the dpp pathway, which regulates numerous developmental decisions, was highly related to mammalian BMP pathways, there was little evidence for an alternative Smad pathway. However, recent work has shown that Drosophila also possesses a TGFβ/activin pathway. This

SARA, a Smad/receptor anchor protein

Interactions between receptors and Smads is a critical step in initiating the intracellular signalling cascade. Thus, controlling this event may be an important regulatory point in the pathway. Recently, a protein named SARA (for Smad anchor for receptor activation), was identified in a screen for Smad2-interacting proteins and was shown to have an important role in this process [10••]. SARA specifically binds unphosphorylated Smad2 and Smad3 and contains a FYVE domain adjacent to its

Ubiquitination in TGFβ signalling

The activity of numerous cellular proteins is controlled by selective proteolysis through the ubiquitin–proteasome pathway [26]. Ubiquitination occurs through an enzymatic cascade involving E1, E2 and E3 ubiquitin protein ligases. Transfer of ubiquitin to proteins occurs via E3-dependent recruitment of specific substrates into the ubiquitination complex. The E2 ligase can then transfer ubiquitin directly to the substrate or to HECT domain E3 ligases which then transfer the ubiquitin to the

Nuclear functions of Smads

Initial studies on the function of Smads as transcriptional regulators have revealed that Smads can bind directly to DNA. However, more recent reports describing the interaction of Smads with a diverse array of DNA-binding proteins have suggested that the primary role of Smads is not to target specific genes through their DNA binding activity but rather to function as co-modulators of transcriptional activity.

Conclusions

From the original observation that activation of Ser/Thr kinase pathways leads to the nuclear accumulation of Smads, we have made considerable advances in our understanding of the role that Smads play in regulating gene expression. This area of study is still in its infancy, however, and it seems certain that continued investigations will reveal how these proteins regulate both the earliest developmental events and numerous homeostatic processes in adults.

Update

Three new papers have provided further insights into the regulation and function of Smads. Hata et al. [61] identified OAZ (Olf-1/EBF associated zinc finger) as one of the first DNA-binding partners for Smad1 and show that Smads also function as transcriptional co-modulators for BMP-target genes. Xu and Attisano [62] recently demonstrated that MH1 domain mutations in Smad2 and Smad4, identified in human cancers, result in targeting of Smads for ubiquitin-mediated degradation in the absence of

References and recommended reading

Papers of particular interest, published within the annual period of review, have been highlighted as:

  • • of special interest

  • •• of outstanding interest

References (63)

  • L. Zawel et al.

    Human Smad3 and Smad4 are sequence-specific transcription activators

    Mol Cell

    (1998)
  • K. Johnson et al.

    Interaction of Smad complexes with tripartite DNA-binding sites

    J Biol Chem

    (1999)
  • K. Yagi et al.

    Alternatively Spliced Variant of Smad2 lacking exon3

    J Biol Chem

    (1999)
  • E. Labbé et al.

    Smad2 and Smad3 positively and negatively regulate TGFβ-dependent transcription through the forkhead DNA binding protein, FAST2

    Mol Cell

    (1998)
  • E. Weisberg et al.

    A mouse homologue of FAST-1 transduces TGFβ superfamily signals and is expressed during early embryogenesis

    Mech Dev

    (1998)
  • S. Zhou et al.

    Characterization of human FAST-1, a TGFβ and activin signal transducer

    Mol Cell

    (1998)
  • C-Y. Yeo et al.

    The role of FAST-1 and Smads in transcriptional regulation by activin during early Xenopus embryogenesis

    J Biol Chem

    (1999)
  • H. Hanafusa et al.

    Involvement of the p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway in transforming growth factor-β-induced gene expression

    J Biol Chem

    (1999)
  • Y. Sano et al.

    ATF-2 is a common nuclear target of Smad and TAK1 pathways in transforming growth factor-β signaling

    J Biol Chem

    (1999)
  • J-I. Hanai et al.

    Interaction and functional cooperation of PEBP2/CBF with Smads

    J Biol Chem

    (1999)
  • X. Shi et al.

    Smad1 interacts with homeobox DNA-binding proteins in bone morphogenetic protein signalling

    J Biol Chem

    (1999)
  • K. Verschueren et al.

    SIP1, a novel zinc finger/homeodomain repressor, interacts with Smad proteins and binds to 5′-CACCT sequences in candidate target genes

    J Biol Chem

    (1999)
  • D. Wotton et al.

    A Smad transcriptional corepressor

    Cell

    (1999)
  • A. Hata et al.

    OAZ uses distinct DNA- and protein-binding zinc fingers in separate BMP-Smad and Olf signaling pathways

    Cell

    (2000)
  • C. Dong et al.

    Microtubule binding to Smads may regulate TGFβ activity

    Mol Cell

    (2000)
  • C-H. Heldin et al.

    TGF-β signalling from cell membrane to nucleus through SMAD proteins

    Nature

    (1997)
  • J. Massagué

    TGF-β Signal Transduction

    Annu Rev Biochem

    (1998)
  • J.L. Christian et al.

    Can’t get no SMADisfaction: Smad proteins as positive and negative regulators of TGF-β family signals

    BioEssays

    (1999)
  • L. Ulloa et al.

    Inhibition of transforming growth factor-β/SMAD signalling by the interferon-ν/STAT pathway

    Nature

    (1999)
  • R.S. Lo et al.

    The L3 loop: a structural motif determining specific interactions between SMAD proteins and TGF-β receptors

    EMBO J

    (1998)
  • G. Lagna et al.

    Partnership between DPC4 and SMAD proteins in TGF-β signalling pathways

    Nature

    (1996)
  • Cited by (484)

    • The long non-coding RNA ILF3-AS1 increases the proliferation and invasion of retinoblastoma through the miR-132–3p/SMAD2 axis

      2020, Experimental Cell Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Therefore, ILF3-AS1 seems to participate in the regulation of RB progression by adsorbing miR-132–3p. SMADS play a role as a signal transducer of TGFβ proteins and are involved in cell growth inhibition, apoptosis and other cellular processes [24,25]. More specifically, they are known to play critical roles in cancer.

    • Role of Zeb2/Sip1 in neuronal development

      2019, Brain Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      There are two types of Smads: receptor-regulated Smads or R-Smad (which include Smad1, Smad2, Smad3 and Smad8) and inhibitory Smads or I-Smad (Smad6 and Smad7). R-Smads are activated by association with TGFβ and BMP superfamilies ligand-receptor complexes, which bind common-mediator Smad (Co-Smad) or Smad4 and together they translocate to the nucleus and regulate expression of target genes (Attisano and Wrana, 2000; Heldin et al., 1997; Kretzschmar and Massague, 1998; Massague, 2012; Moustakas et al., 2001). Conversely, I-Smads prevent the activation and nuclear translocation of R-Smads and thus inhibit signal transduction.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text