Review
Microbial circadian oscillatory systems in Neurospora and Synechococcus: models for cellular clocks

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-5274(00)00074-6Get rights and content

Abstract

Common regulatory patterns have emerged among the feedback loops lying within circadian systems. Significant progress in dissecting the mechanism of clock resetting by temperature and the role of the WC proteins in the Neurospora light response has accompanied documentation of the importance of nuclear localization and phosphorylation-induced turnover of FRQ to this circadian cycle. The long-awaited molecular description of a transcription/translation loop in the Synechococcus circadian system represents a quantal step forward, followed by the identification of additional important proteins and interactions. Finally, the adaptive significance of rhythms in Synechococcus and by extension in all clocks nicely ties up an extraordinary year.

Introduction

An extremely wide range of organisms living on the earth have developed the ability to measure time on a 24 hour basis and thus to adapt their lives to Earth’s dependable geophysical cycles of light/dark and warm/cold (reviewed in [1]). In all organisms studied, the cellular machinery underlying this temporal regulation, which is known as circadian rhythmicity, is based within cells and does not require intercellular communication to create the oscillation. In this way circadian rhythmicity is the essence of cellular regulation. At the same time, however, the study of rhythms drives an recurrent need to look back from the cell and into the environment in which the organism lives, because it is from this environment that the daily time cues arrive that the clock uses to reset its phase. This interplay connecting detailed analysis of a true cellular regulatory mechanism — the circadian oscillatory system — with a constant appreciation of the role of the environment in shaping the rhythm (through ‘input’ to the clock), the role of the rhythm in shaping the environment of the cell (through feedback of the clock on input and behavior), and the export of this time information (through ‘output’ from the clock) has kept the study of circadian rhythms a great research problem. Further, because all such clocks are cellular, microbial systems — and in particular the two genetically tractable systems on which we focus here, Neurospora and Synechococcus — have provided excellent models for predicting and understanding the paradigms and requirements for building circadian systems in living things.

All such rhythms share common features [2]: they have period lengths close to but rarely equal to 24 hours (‘circa dies’, about a day), and the oscillatory systems are compensated such that at different ambient temperatures or during growth with different nutritional supplementation the period length of the cycle is about the same (known as ‘temperature and nutritional compensation’). The rhythms operate only within defined ranges of temperature and adopt distinct phases with respect to environmental stimuli, including changes in light and temperature. By convention, rhythms that have period lengths far outside of the circadian range, that are not compensated, or that cannot be reset by light and temperature are not considered circadian. The intracellular molecular oscillatory system that generates the rhythm with circadian characteristics, whether a single oscillator or, as appears to be more likely the case, the coupled ensemble of oscillators, is considered the circadian clock 3, 4. Within the past few years, the molecular bases of many of these characteristics have come to be understood both in model systems and more recently by extension also in mammals. This review will provide focus on recent advances in our understanding of how cellular circadian systems can accurately keep time and be reset by environmental cues.

Section snippets

A model eukaryotic clock system

Neurospora has revealed a number of molecular characteristics now known to be common among the circadian systems found universally among the ‘Crown Eukaryotes’ [5] that emerged during the Cambrian explosion. Reviews in the Current Opinion series within the past year focused on the common conceptual and molecular threads that characterize these eukaryotic clocks 6, 7, 8. In general, a feedback loop central to these circadian oscillatory systems involves positive and negative elements and is

The Neurospora clock

The Neurospora circadian oscillator comprises an autoregulatory negative feedback cycle where the White Collar-1 (WC1) and White Collar-2 (WC2) proteins and both frq mRNA and FRQ protein serve as central components 9, 15, 24, 25. Mutations in frq or wc-2 can result in substantial period length defects (yielding periods from 16 to 34 hours), arrhythmia, and loss of temperature and nutritional compensation of the clock. The deletion of frq, wc-1, or wc-2 results in loss of normal circadian

Resetting the Neurospora clock with environmental cues

We are beginning to learn a great deal about how the Neurospora cycle is reset by the dominant environmental time cues of light and temperature. Light resets the Neurospora clock by acting rapidly through a complex of WC1 and WC2 proteins (which associate via PAS-like LOV domains, 39••, 40••). Light further influences the stability of the component proteins probably through protein kinase C (PKC)-driven phosphorylation which plays a role in light adaptation [41] and may influence protein

FRQ-less oscillator(s)

Although significant progress has been made in explaining many circadian characteristics in molecular terms, a few remain elusive, including temperature compensation and sustainability. Much effort has focused on the feedback loop involving FRQ and the WC proteins since frq is essential for establishing sustainability, a circadian period length, temperature and nutritional compensation, and the clock’s response to light — the rhythmic characteristics that render an oscillation circadian in

Cyanobacterial circadian rhythms

Cyanobacteria are the simplest organisms known to exhibit circadian rhythms. The cyanobacterial clock regulates many physiological processes, such as photosynthesis, nitrogenase activity, amino acid uptake, cell division, and carbohydrate synthesis [53]. Such rhythms can ‘free-run’ with a circadian period even in cells dividing faster than once every 24 hours 54, 55, 56•. Some diazotrophic (nitrogen-fixing) cyanobacteria exhibit robust circadian rhythms of oxygen-producing photosynthesis and

Components of the cyanobacterial circadian oscillator

What is the biochemical basis of the oscillator that Mother Nature has evolved for this circadian machinery? Now classic studies in which a bioluminescent reporter was driven by a clock-regulated photosynthetic gene identified the first cyanobacterial clock genes [59]. This was followed by molecular genetic studies showing that Synechococcus uses an essential clock gene cluster, kai, composed of three genes, kaiA, kaiB and kaiC for circadian timing [60••]. These genes share no homology to known

Inputs and outputs of the cyanobacterial clock

Several lines of experiments in a diazotrophic Synechococcus sp. RF-1 suggested that a break of photosynthetic activity by darkness is partly responsible for photic-entraining mechanism [57]. However, additional photoreceptive mechanisms may be required for intact circadian photoreception. Interestingly, a Synechococcus sp. RF-1 rhythm mutant designated CR-1 [62] is not fully entrainable to light/dark cycles but is to temperature cycles [63]. Although CR-1 may be the first cyanobacterial

Conclusion — the evolution of circadian systems

Although kai-like genes have not been found in eukaryotes, the kai genes are of particular interest for considering the evolution of circadian systems. First, genes similar to kaiB and kaiC are found in genomes of some Archaea and thermophilic Eubacteria in which circadian rhythms have not been reported; could these be predictors of rhythmicity? Next, although plants may have developed circadian systems independently, the possibility exists that cyanobacterial circadian clocks may have a

Acknowledgements

H Iwasaki thanks T Kondo, M Ishiura, and S Golden for discussion and sharing unpublished results, and CH Johnson and members of the Kondo lab for helpful discussion. H Iwasaki is supported by Japan Society for Promotion of Science for young scientist (JSPS; 09001517). JC Dunlap gratefully acknowledges insightful discussion and feedback from members of the Dartmouth rhythms community, especially J Loros, and was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (GM 34985, MH01186 and

Note added in proof

The work by Nishiwaki et al. that appears in the text as unpublished data has been accepted for publication [78••].

An additional paper has recently been published describing the effects of lipid starvation on the noncircadian long period rhythms of chol-1 mutants with and without mutations in the frq and wc genes [79].

References and recommended reading

Papers of particular interest, published within the annual period of review, have been highlighted as:

  • • of special interest

  • •• of outstanding interest

References (79)

  • B. Kloss et al.

    The Drosophila clock gene double-time encodes a protein closely related to human casein kinase Iϵ

    Cell

    (1998)
  • Y. Shigeyoshi et al.

    Light-induced resetting of a mammalian circadian clock is associated with rapid induction of the mPer1 transcript

    Cell

    (1997)
  • L. Shearman et al.

    Two period homologs: circadian expression and photic regulation in the suprachiasmatic nuclei

    Neuron

    (1997)
  • U. Albrecht et al.

    A differential response of two putative mammalian circadian regulators, mper1 and mper2, to light

    Cell

    (1997)
  • P. Emery et al.

    CRY, a Drosophila clock and light-regulated cryptochrome, is a major contributor to circadian rhythm resetting and photosensitivity

    Cell

    (1998)
  • R. Stanewsky et al.

    The cryb mutation identifies cryptochrome as a circadian photoreceptor in Drosophila

    Cell

    (1998)
  • C.S. Pittendrigh

    Temporal organization: reflections of a Darwinian clock-watcher

    Ann Rev Physiol

    (1993)
  • C. Pittendrigh et al.

    Daily rhythms as coupled oscillator systems and their relation to thermoperiodism and photoperiodism

  • J.C. Dunlap

    An end in the beginning

    Science

    (1998)
  • M.L. Sogin

    The origin of eukaryotes and evolution into major kingdoms

  • H. McWatters et al.

    Clocks for the real world

    Curr Biol

    (1999)
  • S.C. Crosthwaite et al.

    Neurospora wc-1 and wc-2: transcription, photoresponses, and the origins of circadian rhythmicity

    Science

    (1997)
  • T.K. Darlington et al.

    Closing the circadian loop: CLOCK-induced transcription of its own inhibitors per and tim

    Science

    (1998)
  • R. Allada et al.

    A mutant Drosophila homolog of mammalian CLOCK disrupts circadian rhythms and transcription of period and timeless

    Cell

    (1998)
  • J.E. Rutila et al.

    CYCLE is a second bHLH-PAS clock protein essential for circadian rhythmicity and transcription of Drosophila period and timeless

    Cell

    (1998)
  • B. Aronson et al.

    Negative feedback defining a circadian clock: autoregulation in the clock gene frequency

    Science

    (1994)
  • P.E. Hardin et al.

    Feedback of the Drosophila period gene product on circadian cycling of its messenger RNA levels

    Nature

    (1990)
  • A. Sehgal et al.

    Rhythmic expression of timeless: a basis for promoting circadian cycles in period gene autoregulation

    Science

    (1995)
  • S. Sun et al.

    RIGUI, a putative mammalian ortholog of the Drosophila period gene

    Cell

    (1997)
  • H. Tei et al.

    Circadian oscillation of a mammalian homologue of the Drosophila period gene

    Nature

    (1997)
  • I. Edery et al.

    Temporal phosphorylation of the Drosophila period protein

    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA

    (1994)
  • M. Myers et al.

    Light-induced degradation of TIMELESS and entrainment of the Drosophila circadian clock

    Science

    (1996)
  • W. So et al.

    Post-translational regulation contributes to Drosophila clock gene mRNA cycling

    EMBO J

    (1997)
  • B.D. Aronson et al.

    The circadian clock locus frequency: a single ORF defines period length and temperature compensation

    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA

    (1994)
  • S. Crews

    Control of cell lineage-specific development and transcription by bHLH-PAS proteins

    Genes Dev

    (1998)
  • J.J. Loros et al.

    Loss of temperature compensation of circadian period length in the frq-9 mutant of Neurospora crassa

    J Biol Rhythms

    (1986)
  • J.C. Dunlap

    Genetic and molecular dissection of the Neurospora circadian system

  • M. Merrow et al.

    Assignment of circadian function for the Neurospora clock gene frequency

    Nature

    (1999)
  • C. Luo et al.

    Nuclear localization is required for function of the essential clock protein FREQUENCY

    EMBO J

    (1998)
  • Cited by (77)

    • The Neurospora crassa Circadian Clock

      2007, Advances in Genetics
      Citation Excerpt :

      A number of rhythmic phenomena with periods ranging from a few to over 100 h persist or emerge in the absence of the FRQ‐WCC oscillator (Aronson et al., 1994b; Christensen et al., 2004; Correa et al., 2003; Granshaw et al., 2003; He et al., 2005a; Lakin‐Thomas and Brody, 2000; Loros and Feldman, 1986; Merrow et al., 1999). Because such rhythms were first noticed in strains lacking a functional frq gene (Loros and Feldman, 1986), the oscillators that presumably control these rhythms were given the name FLOs (Iwasaki and Dunlap, 2000). Most of these rhythms are noncircadian, that have highly variable period length, cannot be entrained by light, and their periods are not temperature or nutritionally compensated.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text