Research report
Ventral medial prefrontal cortex and emotional perseveration: the memory for prior extinction training

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2003.09.021Get rights and content

Abstract

Several years ago, we found that lesions of ventral medial prefrontal cortex (mPFCv) disrupted performance during the extinction component of a classical fear conditioning task without affecting acquisition performance. We called this emotional perseveration, hypothesizing that mPFCv may normally act to inhibit fear responses to a conditioned stimulus (CS) when the CS no longer signals danger. Subsequent studies have supported this hypothesis, showing that mPFCv is crucial for the memory of prior extinction training. The present study examined the effects of mPFCv lesions made after training. Such lesions resulted in reduced freezing to contextual stimuli and normal responding to the CS presented alone during a retention test. Rats were then subjected to extinction trials (CS without US) over multiple days. In contrast to pre-training lesions, post-training lesions had little effect on extinction rate. All rats were given additional training. Lesioned rats expressed greater fear reactions than controls, indicating that prior extinction was less effective in them. Lesioned rats also showed resistance to extinction during reextinction trials, confirming our earlier finding that lesions made before training weaken the effectiveness of extinction trials. These results suggest three conclusions. First, an intact mPFCv during acquisition may protect the animal from prolonged responding during extinction trials following brain insult. Second, changes in mPFCv may predispose subjects toward enhanced fear reactions that are difficult to extinguish when reexposed to fearful stimuli, due to a diminished capacity to benefit from the fear-reducing impact of prior extinction experience. Third, contextual cues processed by mPFCv may influence extinction performance.

Introduction

A prominent feature of prefrontal cortex (PFC) pathology is perseveration, the inability to inhibit behaviors that are no longer appropriate under present circumstances ([10], [23], [29], [30], [37], [51], [56]; see [31], [32]). While such perseverative behaviors have typically been observed in reversal learning tasks (see [21], [31]), several years ago we found evidence of perseveration in conditioned fear [40]. In a study examining the role of the ventral portion of medial PFC (mPFCv) in fear conditioning, lesioned rats exhibited emotional perseveration—an increased tendency to continue responding to a conditioned fear stimulus (a tone) in the absence of the unconditioned stimulus (US; foot shock) during extinction trials. We concluded that mPFCv plays an important role in regulating fear inhibition during the extinction process, when conditioned responses are weakened as a result of exposure to the conditioned stimulus (CS) alone.

Since that time, several studies have provided support for the idea that medial prefrontal cortex is involved in the extinction component of conditioned fear learning ([1], [24], [25], [38], [41], [50]; but see [22]). Morrow et al. [41] found that mPFCv lesions disrupt extinction performance, whether lesions were made prior to or following acquisition training. The work of Quirk and colleagues [38], [50] has been particularly informative in showing that mPFCv, the infralimbic cortex (IL) in particular, is important for the retention of extinction learning following a 24 h delay, but not during fear acquisition or the expression of extinction during massed extinction training. Their findings provide evidence for the prevailing idea that the extinction process involves formation of a new, inhibitory association that develops in competition with, but without erasure of, the excitatory association formed during acquisition [5], [33], [42], [45], [46], [50].

The current study had two objectives. The first was to examine the impact of post-acquisition lesions on the retention and extinction of fear responses. Previously, we found that pre-training lesions had no effect on the retention of acquisition but did affect extinction [40]. If mPFCv is only actively engaged during extinction retention [38], [50], then rats with post-acquisition lesions should show resistance to extinction just as they did when lesions were made prior to fear conditioning [40]. The second goal was to examine the effectiveness of extinction by determining the extent to which reacquisition of fear responses is affected by prior extinction. Bouton and King [8] have proposed that memories of acquisition and extinction are both available following extinction, and that responding to an extinguished CS may be affected by both. Using the reacquisition procedure, it was possible to examine whether lesioned and control rats were differentially affected by extinction. We hypothesized that lesioned animals would express more fear than controls during reacquisition, which would indicate that prior extinction trials were less effective in guiding their behavior.

Section snippets

Animals and general procedures

Male Sprague–Dawley rats, weighing 250–275 g upon arrival, were housed in pairs for 9 days in a colony room where they had unlimited access to rat chow and water and were exposed to a 12-h light:12-h dark cycle. Six days after arrival, animals received 1 day of context habituation and 2 days of acquisition training (described in the following). The next day they underwent surgery. Animals were assigned to one of two surgical groups based on training performance, such that the mean freezing

Histology

All lesions included damage to PL and IL cortices. Damage to caudal medial orbital (MO) cortex was variable and did not produce any consistent behavioral changes on any measures, and thus was not used as a criterion for exclusion. One rat (group mPFCv-no-delay) received extensive damage to the overlying dorsal anterior cingulate cortex. Due to findings from a previous study [39] showing that such lesions enhance extinction effects by increasing fear levels, this animal was excluded from

Acquisition

In the present study we made lesions of mPFCv following acquisition training but prior to extinction. On the test of retention 2 weeks after surgery, lesioned animals responded like controls to the CS, but responded significantly less to the context. mPFCv receives a prominent projection from the hippocampal formation [12], [27], [28], lesions of which also greatly reduce responding to the context without affecting CS conditioning [48]. However, when we made lesions prior to training [40] we

References (56)

  • R.R. Terreberry et al.

    Rat medial frontal cortex: a visceral motor region with a direct projection to the solitary nucleus

    Brain Res.

    (1983)
  • R.R. Terreberry et al.

    The rat medial frontal cortex projects directly to autonomic regions of the brainstem

    Brain Res. Bull.

    (1987)
  • D. Barrett et al.

    Metabolic mapping of mouse brain activity after extinction of a conditioned emotional response

    J. Neurosci.

    (2003)
  • A. Bechara et al.

    Failure to respond autonomically to anticipated future outcomes following damage to prefrontal cortex

    Cereb. Cortex

    (1996)
  • R.J. Blanchard et al.

    Crouching as an index of fear

    J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol.

    (1969)
  • Bouton ME. Context and retrieval in extinction and in other examples of interference in simple associative learning....
  • M.E. Bouton

    Context, ambiguity, and classical conditioning

    Current Directions in Psychological Science

    (1994)
  • M.E. Bouton

    Conditioning, remembering, and forgetting

    J. Exp. Psychol.: Anim. Behav. Process.

    (1994)
  • M.E. Bouton et al.

    Conditioned fear assessed by freezing and by the suppression of three different baselines

    Anim. Learn. Behav.

    (1980)
  • M.E. Bouton et al.

    Effect of context on performance to conditioned stimuli with mixed histories of reinforcement and nonreinforcement

    J. Exp. Psychol.: Anim. Behav. Process.

    (1986)
  • M.E. Bouton et al.

    Slow reacquisition following extinction: context, encoding, and retrieval mechanisms

    J. Exp. Psychol.: Anim. Behav. Process.

    (1989)
  • Cohen JD, O’Reilly RC. A preliminary theory of the interactions between prefrontal cortex and hippocampus that...
  • F. Conde et al.

    Afferent connections of the medial frontal cortex of the rat. II. Cortical and subcortical afferents

    J. Comp. Neurol.

    (1995)
  • Damasio AR, Tranel D, Damasio H. Somatic markers and the guidance of behavior. In: Levin H, Eisenberg H, Benton A,...
  • A. Diamond

    Developmental time course in human infants and infant monkeys, and the neural bases, of inhibitory control in reaching

    Annu. NY Academy Sci.

    (1990)
  • R. Dias et al.

    Dissociation in prefrontal cortex of affective and attentional shifts

    Nature

    (1996)
  • Falls WA, Davis M. Behavioral and physiological analysis of fear inhibition. In: Friedman MJ, Charney DS, Deutch AY,...
  • W.A. Falls et al.

    Extinction of fear-potentiated startle: blockade by infusion of an NMDA antagonist into the amygdala

    J. Neurosci.

    (1992)
  • Cited by (116)

    • The rodent medial prefrontal cortex and associated circuits in orchestrating adaptive behavior under variable demands

      2022, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
      Citation Excerpt :

      Pharmacological inactivation of the PL suppresses conditioned responding to aversive cues (Laurent and Westbrook, 2009; Sierra-Mercado et al., 2011), and abolishes the acquisition and retrieval of conditioned place avoidance to different noxious stimuli (Jiang et al., 2014). Conversely, disrupting IL activity leaves aversive conditioning intact but has consistently been shown to impair extinction learning, in which animals learn to inhibit conditioned responses when the aversive outcome is withheld (Do-Monte et al., 2015a; Lay et al., 2020; Lebron et al., 2004; Morgan et al., 2003; Quirk et al., 2000; Sierra-Mercado et al., 2006). Furthermore, enhancing IL activity has reliably been shown to suppress aversive conditioned responding and to facilitate extinction learning (Do-Monte et al., 2015a; Kim et al., 2010; Lingawi et al., 2018, 2017; Milad and Quirk, 2002; Milad et al., 2004; Peters et al., 2010; Thompson et al., 2010; Vidal-Gonzalez et al., 2006), whereas augmenting PL activity has been shown to be disruptive or have no effect on extinction (Thompson et al., 2010; Vidal-Gonzalez et al., 2006).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text