Elsevier

Behavioural Brain Research

Volume 202, Issue 2, 14 September 2009, Pages 147-152
Behavioural Brain Research

Review
TMS investigations into the task-dependent functional interplay between human posterior parietal and motor cortex

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2009.03.023Get rights and content

Abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can be used in two different ways to investigate the contribution of cortical areas involved in grasp/reach movements in humans. It can produce “virtual lesions” that interfere with activity in particular cortical areas at specific times during a task, or it can be used in a twin coil design to test the excitability of cortical projections to M1 at different times during a task. The former method has described how cortical structures such as the ventral premotor cortex (PMv), dorsal premotor cortex (PMd) and the anterior intraparietal sulcus (aIPS) are important for specific aspects of reaching, grasping and lifting objects. In the latter method, a conditioning stimulus (CS) is first used to activate putative pathways to the motor cortex from, for example, posterior parietal cortex (PPC) or PMd, while a second, test stimulus (TS), delivered over the primary motor cortex a few ms later probes any changes in excitability that are produced by the input. Thus changes in the effectiveness of the conditioning pulse give an indication of how the excitability of the connection changes over time and during a specific task. Here we review studies describing the time course of operation of parallel intracortical circuits and cortico-cortical connections between the PMd, PMv, PPC and M1, thus demonstrating that functional interplay between these areas and the primary motor cortices is not fixed, but can change in a highly task-, condition- and time-dependent manner.

Introduction

Although a common action such as reaching and grasping an apple in order to bring it to the mouth seems an almost automatic process, it requires a complex interaction between different cortical areas. Non-primary motor regions such as the premotor and the posterior parietal cortex elaborate crucial information as to the optimal motor plan that has to be performed. Thus, the target of the reach must be located in space; a decision must be made about the most appropriate type and orientation of grasp according to the weight and shape of the object; and the timing of the reaching movement of the arm must be synchronised with the opening of the hand so that the object can be grasped as effectively and quickly as possible [1], [2]. This information then has to be conveyed to the primary motor cortex and converted into the ultimate motor command.

Although fMRI studies indicate that an extensive bilateral network of frontoparietal areas, including the posterior parietal cortex (PPC), the ventral (PMv) and the dorsal (PMd) premotor cortex, become active during reach/grasp movements [2], they give little insight into the respective functional role of each area into particular components of the task. Lesion techniques in monkeys [3], [4]) or observations in stroke patients [5], [6], [7] can fill some of these gaps in knowledge by revealing the motor deficits that occur after dysfunction of particular brain areas. For example, functional imaging studies in healthy subjects show activation of the anterior intraparietal sulcus (aIPS) a sub-region of the PPC in association with visually guided grasping [8], [9]. Complementary studies of patients with lesions in the same area reveal marked deficits in hand preshaping during visually guided reach-to-grasp movements, whereas reaching remains relatively intact [5].

However, studies in human patients often involve large and complex lesions, and together with the existence of possible compensation mechanisms can often make behavioural results difficult to interpret. As we indicate below, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in healthy subjects can be applied in such a way as to interfere temporarily with function in particular cortical areas. It has therefore become a very useful additional technique to investigate the functional role of parietal and frontal areas in reach to grasp movements.

Section snippets

“Virtual lesion” studies

A single TMS pulse interferes with ongoing activity at the stimulated site for 50–150 ms, and hence can be viewed as producing a short lasting and reversible functional lesion of that area [10]. Changes in behaviour induced by this procedure can therefore reveal information about the role played by the portion of the cortex that underwent TMS in a given task.

In the initial experiments with TMS, single pulses or brief trains (of hundreds of milliseconds) of repeated pulses (rTMS) were applied at

Twin coil TMS functional connectivity studies of premotor and posterior parietal cortex

While the studies above reveal the contribution of PMv, PMd and aIPS in generating reaching and grasping movements and in on-line corrections after perturbations, they do not provide direct information about the functional connectivity of these non primary motor areas with the primary motor cortex that would explain how their activity may modulate the spatial pattern of output from primary motor areas preceding execution of a movement. For instance Cattaneo et al. [32] confirmed the involvement

Conclusions and perspectives

In conclusion, a variety of TMS methods are therefore now available to study the time course of involvement as well as the functional connectivity of areas active during preparation and execution of complex movement plans. They illustrate the time course of operation of parallel intracortical circuits and cortico-cortical connections between the PMd, PMv, PPC and M1, demonstrating that functional interplay between these areas and the primary motor cortices is not fixed, but can change in a

References (44)

  • F. Binkofski et al.

    Human anterior intraparietal area subserves prehension: a combined lesion and functional MRI activation study

    Neurology

    (1998)
  • H.O. Karnath et al.

    Cortical control of visually guided reaching: evidence from patients with optic ataxia

    Cereb Cortex

    (2005)
  • M.T. Perenin et al.

    Optic ataxia: a specific disruption in visuomotor mechanisms. I. Different aspects of the deficit in reaching for objects

    Brain

    (1988)
  • J.C. Culham et al.

    Visually guided grasping produces fMRI activation in dorsal but not ventral stream brain areas

    Exp Brain Res

    (2003)
  • H.H. Ehrsson et al.

    Cortical activity in precision- versus power-grip tasks: an fMRI study

    J Neurophysiol

    (2000)
  • V. Walsh et al.

    Transcranial magnetic stimulation and cognitive neuroscience

    Nat Rev Neurosci

    (2000)
  • M. Desmurget et al.

    Role of the posterior parietal cortex in updating reaching movements to a visual target

    Nat Neurosci

    (1999)
  • E. Tunik et al.

    Virtual lesions of the anterior intraparietal area disrupt goal-dependent on-line adjustments of grasp

    Nat Neurosci

    (2005)
  • M. Davare et al.

    Temporal dissociation between hand shaping and grip force scaling in the anterior intraparietal area

    J Neurosci

    (2007)
  • M. Davare et al.

    Dissociating the role of ventral and dorsal premotor cortex in precision grasping

    J Neurosci

    (2006)
  • U. Ziemann et al.

    I-waves in motor cortex

    J Clin Neurophysiol

    (2000)
  • S. Bestmann et al.

    Functional MRI of the immediate impact of transcranial magnetic stimulation on cortical and subcortical motor circuits

    Eur J Neurosci

    (2004)
  • Cited by (86)

    • Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the brain: What is stimulated? – A consensus and critical position paper

      2022, Clinical Neurophysiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The cortico-cortical interaction may vary when tested in the context of a task-free state (i.e., rest) or during a specific motor or cognitive task (Koch et al., 2006; Neige et al., 2021). These task-dependent changes give an indication of how the excitability of the connection changes over time when the cortical networks become active during a specific task (Groppa et al., 2012c; Koch and Rothwell, 2009). For instance, dual-site TMS revealed that effective connectivity between the posterior parietal cortex, premotor cortex, and M1-HAND increase in a highly task-, condition- and time-dependent manner during the planning phase of different reaching-to-grasp actions (Koch et al., 2010).

    • Transcranial magnetic stimulation: Emerging biomarkers and novel therapeutics in Alzheimer's disease

      2020, Neuroscience Letters
      Citation Excerpt :

      In humans it can be assessed by non-invasive repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) [16], in strict analogy with the hippocampal plasticity assessable in animal models. Works from our group and others revealed that AD patients show a remarkable impairment of long-term potentiation (LTP)-like cortical plasticity [21,31–33]. This condition was associated with a more aggressive AD clinical course and, importantly, in all of the cases associated to very high CSF levels of t-tau proteins [34].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text