ReviewTMS investigations into the task-dependent functional interplay between human posterior parietal and motor cortex
Introduction
Although a common action such as reaching and grasping an apple in order to bring it to the mouth seems an almost automatic process, it requires a complex interaction between different cortical areas. Non-primary motor regions such as the premotor and the posterior parietal cortex elaborate crucial information as to the optimal motor plan that has to be performed. Thus, the target of the reach must be located in space; a decision must be made about the most appropriate type and orientation of grasp according to the weight and shape of the object; and the timing of the reaching movement of the arm must be synchronised with the opening of the hand so that the object can be grasped as effectively and quickly as possible [1], [2]. This information then has to be conveyed to the primary motor cortex and converted into the ultimate motor command.
Although fMRI studies indicate that an extensive bilateral network of frontoparietal areas, including the posterior parietal cortex (PPC), the ventral (PMv) and the dorsal (PMd) premotor cortex, become active during reach/grasp movements [2], they give little insight into the respective functional role of each area into particular components of the task. Lesion techniques in monkeys [3], [4]) or observations in stroke patients [5], [6], [7] can fill some of these gaps in knowledge by revealing the motor deficits that occur after dysfunction of particular brain areas. For example, functional imaging studies in healthy subjects show activation of the anterior intraparietal sulcus (aIPS) a sub-region of the PPC in association with visually guided grasping [8], [9]. Complementary studies of patients with lesions in the same area reveal marked deficits in hand preshaping during visually guided reach-to-grasp movements, whereas reaching remains relatively intact [5].
However, studies in human patients often involve large and complex lesions, and together with the existence of possible compensation mechanisms can often make behavioural results difficult to interpret. As we indicate below, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in healthy subjects can be applied in such a way as to interfere temporarily with function in particular cortical areas. It has therefore become a very useful additional technique to investigate the functional role of parietal and frontal areas in reach to grasp movements.
Section snippets
“Virtual lesion” studies
A single TMS pulse interferes with ongoing activity at the stimulated site for 50–150 ms, and hence can be viewed as producing a short lasting and reversible functional lesion of that area [10]. Changes in behaviour induced by this procedure can therefore reveal information about the role played by the portion of the cortex that underwent TMS in a given task.
In the initial experiments with TMS, single pulses or brief trains (of hundreds of milliseconds) of repeated pulses (rTMS) were applied at
Twin coil TMS functional connectivity studies of premotor and posterior parietal cortex
While the studies above reveal the contribution of PMv, PMd and aIPS in generating reaching and grasping movements and in on-line corrections after perturbations, they do not provide direct information about the functional connectivity of these non primary motor areas with the primary motor cortex that would explain how their activity may modulate the spatial pattern of output from primary motor areas preceding execution of a movement. For instance Cattaneo et al. [32] confirmed the involvement
Conclusions and perspectives
In conclusion, a variety of TMS methods are therefore now available to study the time course of involvement as well as the functional connectivity of areas active during preparation and execution of complex movement plans. They illustrate the time course of operation of parallel intracortical circuits and cortico-cortical connections between the PMd, PMv, PPC and M1, demonstrating that functional interplay between these areas and the primary motor cortices is not fixed, but can change in a
References (44)
- et al.
Grasping objects: the cortical mechanisms of visuomotor transformation
Trends Neurosci
(1995) - et al.
Functionally specific reorganization in human premotor cortex
Neuron
(2007) - et al.
Transcranial magnetic stimulation can be used to test connections to primary motor areas from frontal and medial cortex in humans
NeuroImage
(2001) - et al.
Connectivity Between Posterior Parietal Cortex and Ipsilateral Motor Cortex Is Altered in Schizophrenia
Biol Psychiatry
(2008) - et al.
Two cortical systems for reaching in central and peripheral vision
Neuron
(2005) - et al.
Individual differences in white-matter microstructure reflect variation in functional connectivity during choice
Curr Biol
(2007) - et al.
Dynamic intra- and interhemispheric interactions during unilateral and bilateral hand movements assessed with fMRI and DCM
Neuroimage
(2008) The neuroscience of grasping
Nat Rev Neurosci
(2005)- et al.
Cortical mechanism for the visual guidance of hand grasping movements in the monkey: a reversible inactivation study
Brain
(2001) - et al.
Deficit of hand preshaping after muscimol injection in monkey parietal cortex
Neuroreport
(1994)
Human anterior intraparietal area subserves prehension: a combined lesion and functional MRI activation study
Neurology
Cortical control of visually guided reaching: evidence from patients with optic ataxia
Cereb Cortex
Optic ataxia: a specific disruption in visuomotor mechanisms. I. Different aspects of the deficit in reaching for objects
Brain
Visually guided grasping produces fMRI activation in dorsal but not ventral stream brain areas
Exp Brain Res
Cortical activity in precision- versus power-grip tasks: an fMRI study
J Neurophysiol
Transcranial magnetic stimulation and cognitive neuroscience
Nat Rev Neurosci
Role of the posterior parietal cortex in updating reaching movements to a visual target
Nat Neurosci
Virtual lesions of the anterior intraparietal area disrupt goal-dependent on-line adjustments of grasp
Nat Neurosci
Temporal dissociation between hand shaping and grip force scaling in the anterior intraparietal area
J Neurosci
Dissociating the role of ventral and dorsal premotor cortex in precision grasping
J Neurosci
I-waves in motor cortex
J Clin Neurophysiol
Functional MRI of the immediate impact of transcranial magnetic stimulation on cortical and subcortical motor circuits
Eur J Neurosci
Cited by (86)
Upregulation of the parietal cortex improves freezing of gait in Parkinson's disease
2023, Journal of the Neurological SciencesTranscranial magnetic stimulation of the brain: What is stimulated? – A consensus and critical position paper
2022, Clinical NeurophysiologyCitation Excerpt :The cortico-cortical interaction may vary when tested in the context of a task-free state (i.e., rest) or during a specific motor or cognitive task (Koch et al., 2006; Neige et al., 2021). These task-dependent changes give an indication of how the excitability of the connection changes over time when the cortical networks become active during a specific task (Groppa et al., 2012c; Koch and Rothwell, 2009). For instance, dual-site TMS revealed that effective connectivity between the posterior parietal cortex, premotor cortex, and M1-HAND increase in a highly task-, condition- and time-dependent manner during the planning phase of different reaching-to-grasp actions (Koch et al., 2010).
Exploring cortico-cortical interactions during action preparation by means of dual-coil transcranial magnetic stimulation: A systematic review
2021, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral ReviewsTranscranial magnetic stimulation: Emerging biomarkers and novel therapeutics in Alzheimer's disease
2020, Neuroscience LettersCitation Excerpt :In humans it can be assessed by non-invasive repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) [16], in strict analogy with the hippocampal plasticity assessable in animal models. Works from our group and others revealed that AD patients show a remarkable impairment of long-term potentiation (LTP)-like cortical plasticity [21,31–33]. This condition was associated with a more aggressive AD clinical course and, importantly, in all of the cases associated to very high CSF levels of t-tau proteins [34].
Brain networks and their relevance for stroke rehabilitation
2019, Clinical Neurophysiology