Research reportThe impact of basal ganglia lesions on sensorimotor synchronization, spontaneous motor tempo, and the detection of tempo changes
Research highlights
▶ Spontaneous motor tempo is heterogeneous in patients with basal ganglia lesions. ▶ Patients with basal ganglia lesions are less sensitive to tempo changes. ▶ Basal ganglia lesions affect attention-dependent period correction at slower tempi.
Introduction
Individuals continuously adjust their behavior to environmental changes. The underlying adaptive process unfolds in time and involves the cyclic processing of motor and sensory information [1]. The question arises whether this cyclic processing is merely intrinsically temporal or to what extent temporal information is actually processed and used as a source of information in itself. Some internal representation of temporal structure is a prerequisite for efficient timing, which in turn bears the potential to optimize adaptive processes. Efficient timing of behavior implies temporally appropriate reactive and proactive actions. The latter depend on anticipation and predictions about the temporal structure of future changes or events as well as the ability to temporally align behavior with these events. Both aspects converge in sensorimotor synchronization (SMS).
SMS is a specific form of adaptive interaction with the environment. It is an extensively studied process that merges motor and non-motor components in a single setting. SMS can be characterized as the temporal coordination of a motor rhythm with an external rhythm (for reviews see [2], [3]). This temporal coordination can be conceived as synchronization. Synchronization denotes the “adjustment of rhythms of oscillating objects due to their weak interaction” [4]. An oscillation is defined by its phase, relative to another oscillation, and period, and provides a means to describe the temporal relation of the events that constitute a rhythm in terms of frequency, i.e., the repetition of similar events in a specific amount of time. Complex rhythmic activity and synchronization between different rhythms constitute central aspects of life. Physiological rhythms interact continuously with each other and the environment in order to mediate between internal and external events [5]. In cognition, this implies adaptation of internally-generated to external rhythms via unidirectional coupling which eventually leads to stimulus-driven synchronization of behavior.
Both SMS and temporal processing have been modeled on the basis of oscillations and the fundamental dissociation of automatic and controlled sub-processes. For example, temporal processing is hypothesized to rest on the coincidental activation of medium spiny neurons in the BG by ensembles of cortical neural oscillations [6], [7]. In SMS, the period of an adaptive oscillatory timekeeper is assumed to reflect the temporal structure of the pacing signal, thereby establishing a reference for the timing of successive motor commands [8]. In this context, the current study investigates a combination of these aspects by providing BG patients and controls with an oscillatory perceptual input whose temporal structure needs to be exploited to generate oscillatory motor behavior. Error correction mechanisms adjust the phase and period of the internal timekeeper oscillation if it is confronted with a perturbation, i.e., a change in the temporal structure of the pacing signal. These error correction mechanisms are dissociable based on their dependence on attention, the intention to adapt, and awareness of a tempo change [9]. Whereas phase correction depends solely on the intention to maintain synchrony and can therefore be considered automatic, period correction depends also on attention and awareness of the tempo change.
A comparable dissociation between automatic and controlled mechanisms has been proposed with respect to temporal processing [10]. More specifically, the cerebellum (CE) performs automatic or pre-attentive, short-range, event-based temporal processing, while in parallel, the BG and cortico-striato-thalamo-cortical circuitry engage in attention-dependent, longer-range, interval-based temporal processing [7], [11], [12]. Attention, or the ability to attentively detect a change in temporal structure may therefore not only decide upon the type of error correction, but also upon the primary temporal processing system. Temporal structure may thereby influence cognitive processes, e.g., as the basis for attentional set shifting and sequence coordination [13]. This view is consistent with Dynamic Attending Theory DAT [14], which proposes that attention can be modeled as a self-sustained oscillation capable of entrainment. Within the framework of DAT, the temporal structure of a stimulus guides the allocation of attentional resources thereby evoking stimulus-driven attending [15]. On this basis, attentive adaptation to tempo change in SMS would depend on the parallel engagement of pre-attentive and attention-dependent temporal processing systems, as well as phase and period correction to adjust internal timekeeper and/or attention oscillations.
The role of the BG in temporal processing and in SMS has been investigated primarily in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), albeit with mixed results [16], [17], [18]. Studies involving PD patients also suggest difficulties in beat extraction and the comparison of rhythmic sequences [19]. However, PD is a progressive neurodegenerative disease, and besides medication and different PD subgroups [20] some of the heterogeneity of the respective results may be due to the variable extent of cortical damage in this population, which can be minimal or absent in patients with BG lesions [21], [22]. Studies on SMS involving patients with focal lesions of the BG are scarce. Aparicio et al. [23] used a synchronization–continuation paradigm and found no evidence for impaired temporal processing performance in this group. Different tasks, stimulus characteristics, and cognitive sets add further complexity to the identification of specific BG and cerebellar temporal processing functions [24].
Besides attention, temporal range seems to be an important factor, as temporal processing evolves across different timescales that may map onto different physiological and psychological mechanisms [10], [24], [25]. A well-defined boundary between short-range and longer-range temporal processing remains elusive, although values around 500 ms [26] and close to 1000 ms [27] have been suggested. Fraisse [28] emphasizes that synchronization is most stable for tempi between 400 and 800 ms, while the intermediary tempo of 600 ms is most representative for unpaced, spontaneous motor activity. This has been confirmed in more recent studies [29] that also found a correlation between individual spontaneous motor tempo (SMT) and a preferred perceptual tempo [30]. It corresponds to the “indifference interval” or “indifference zone” that is neither systematically overestimated nor underestimated [28], [31]. A tempo of 600 ms is within the range for optimal pulse sensation [32] and tempo sensitivity, for a review see [33], [34]. Although originating from a different perspective, Karmarkar and Buonomano [35] hypothesize that temporal processing between 400 and 800 ms may be accurately performed by mechanisms underlying both time perception and time estimation. Hence, the SMS task in the current study incorporated a base tempo of 600 ms and tempo changes that induced shifts relative to this base tempo. This procedure should perturb the synchronization of internal timekeeper and/or attention oscillations. We expected that damage to the cortico-striato-thalamo-cortical attention-dependent temporal processing system due to BG lesions should lead to difficulties in the evaluation of temporal structure and consequently in maintaining attentive synchrony. These difficulties should compromise the ability to detect and to assess a tempo change which should in turn lead to a lesser degree of attention-dependent period correction during SMS in the patient group, while automatic phase correction should be preserved.
We assessed SMT before and after the main SMS task to explore whether the SMT of patients with BG lesions differs from that of healthy controls and whether it would be influenced by the intervening SMS task. For example, stronger reliance on the unimpaired cerebellar short-range system in the patient group may be reflected by a preference for faster SMT rates. SMT is not constrained by simple biomechanical mechanisms [28] and in the absence of an external pacemaker it has to rely on internally generated temporal structure and simultaneous monitoring of temporal regularity. We hypothesized that faster SMT rates in the patient group could reflect stronger reliance on the unaffected cerebellar short range temporal processing system. BG lesions should compromise both the consistency of internally generated temporal structure and the monitoring process, which in turn should lead to increased tapping variability in the patient group. In general, a better understanding of these fundamental mechanisms and the way they are altered in this specific patient group is not only important for modeling the mechanisms underlying the adaptive interaction with the environment but may also be helpful in optimizing the temporal structure of compensatory strategies used in therapeutic settings.
Section snippets
Participants
10 patients with focal lesions of the BG due to stroke (mean 6.2 years post lesion onset, SD = 2.5) and 10 healthy controls (one woman per group) participated in the current study. None had prior experience with finger tapping in an experimental setting. The group comprised eight patients with partial middle central artery infarction and two patients with intracerebral hemorrhage. Lesions were left-lateralized in eight, and right-lateralized in two patients. In seven patients lesions affected
Spontaneous motor tempo
Mean SMT in the patient group was 551 ms (SD 105 ms) before, and 541 ms (SD 58 ms) after the SMS task. For the control group the corresponding values were 536 ms (SD 30 ms) before, and 552 ms (SD 26 ms) after the SMS task (Fig. 2). Distribution of SMT rates differed between the two groups. Levene's test of equality of error variances revealed that the patient group was more heterogeneous than the control group before, F(1.18) = 5.94, p < .03, and after the SMS task, F(1.18) = 7.64, p < .02. However, contrary
Discussion
The current study explored spontaneous motor tempo and sensorimotor synchronization in patients with focal BG lesions by means of two finger tapping tasks. Damage to the BG was associated with a more heterogeneous distribution of individual rates as well as more variable tapping during the SMT task. These results confirm that BG lesions have an effect on SMT in that they affect the ability to execute a steady sequence of periodic actions. Given the role of the BG in attention-dependent temporal
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Bruno H. Repp for helpful comments during the early stages of this work and Anika Stockert for support in the preparation of the clinical data.
References (47)
The prefrontal cortex—an update: time is of the essence
Neuron
(2001)- et al.
Functional neuroimaging correlates of finger-tapping task variations: an ALE meta-analysis
Neuroimage
(2008) - et al.
Cortico-striatal circuits and interval timing: coincidence detection of oscillatory processes
Cognitive Brain Res
(2004) - et al.
Distinct systems for automatic and cognitively controlled time measurement: evidence from neuroimaging
Curr Opin Neurobiol
(2003) The representation of temporal information in perception and motor control
Curr Opin Neurobiol
(1996)- et al.
Dissecting the brain's internal clock: how frontal-striatal circuitry keeps time and shifts attention
Brain Cognition
(2002) - et al.
Expectancy, attention, and time
Cognitive Psychol
(2000) - et al.
Impairment of beat-based rhythm discrimination in Parkinson's disease
Cortex
(2009) - et al.
Multidimensional sequence learning in patients with focal basal ganglia lesions
Brain Cognition
(2005) - et al.
Effects of focal basal ganglia lesions on timing and force control
Brain Cognition
(2005)
Remembering the time: a continuous clock
Trends Cogn Sci
Rhythm tempo
The development of rhythmic attending in auditory sequences: attunement, referent period, focal attending
Cognition
Timing in the absence of clocks: encoding time in neural network states
Neuron
Temporal control of movements in sensorimotor synchronization
Brain Cognition
The role of the supplementary motor area (SMA) in word production
Brain Res
Neurophysiological correlates of error correction in sensorimotor-synchronization
Neuroimage
Sensorimotor synchronization: a review of the tapping literature
Psychon B Rev
Synchronization: A Universal Concept in Nonlinear Sciences
Synchronization and rhythmic processes in physiology
Nature
What makes us tick? Functional and neural mechanisms of interval timing
Nat Rev Neurosci
A model of synchronization of motor acts to a stimulus sequence I. Timing and error corrections
Biol Cybern
Adaptation to tempo changes in sensorimotor synchronization: effects of intention, attention, and awareness
Q J Exp Psychol
Cited by (118)
Auditory rhythm discrimination in adults who stutter: An fMRI study
2023, Brain and LanguageIdentifying a brain network for musical rhythm: A functional neuroimaging meta-analysis and systematic review
2022, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral ReviewsAbout time: Ageing influences neural markers of temporal predictability
2021, Biological PsychologyHow Beat Perception Co-opts Motor Neurophysiology
2021, Trends in Cognitive Sciences