Elsevier

Biological Psychiatry

Volume 63, Issue 8, 15 April 2008, Pages 776-783
Biological Psychiatry

Original Article
Reduced Attentional Engagement Contributes to Deficits in Prefrontal Inhibitory Control in Schizophrenia

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.11.009Get rights and content

Background

Problems with the voluntary control of behavior, such as those leading to increased antisaccade errors, are accepted as evidence of prefrontal dysfunction in schizophrenia. We previously reported that speeded prosaccade responses, i.e., shorter response latencies for automatic shifts of attention to visual targets, were associated with higher antisaccade error rates in schizophrenia. This suggests that dysregulation of automatic attentional processes may contribute to disturbances in prefrontally mediated control of voluntary behavior.

Methods

Twenty-four antipsychotic-naïve schizophrenia patients and 30 healthy individuals completed three tasks: a no-gap prosaccade task in which subjects shifted gaze toward a peripheral target that appeared coincident with the disappearance of a central fixation target and separate prosaccade and antisaccade tasks in which a temporal gap or overlap of the central target offset and peripheral target onset occurred. Sixteen patients were retested after 6 weeks of antipsychotic treatment.

Results

Patients’ prosaccade latencies in the no-gap task were speeded compared with healthy individuals. While patients were not atypical in the degree to which response latencies were speeded or slowed by the gap and overlap manipulations, those patients with diminished attentional engagement on the prosaccade task (i.e., reduced overlap effect) had significantly elevated antisaccade error rates. This effect persisted in patients evaluated after antipsychotic treatment.

Conclusions

This study provides evidence that a reduced ability to engage attention may render patients more distracted by sensory inputs, thereby further compromising impaired executive control during antisaccade tasks. Thus, alterations in attentional and executive control functions can synergistically disrupt voluntary behavioral responses in schizophrenia.

Section snippets

Subjects

Twenty-four antipsychotic-naïve individuals (16 male subjects, 8 female subjects) with a DSM-IV diagnosis of schizophrenia (n = 22) or schizoaffective disorder (n = 2) according to structured clinical interviews (Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV [SCID]) (24) and additional clinical data reviewed at consensus diagnosis meetings participated. Thirty healthy individuals (14 male subjects, 16 female subjects) recruited from the community matched patients on age, sex, and intelligence

Prosaccade Latencies

In the no-gap prosaccade task, patients’ latencies were faster than those of healthy individuals [Fgroup(1,53) = 6.00, p = .02; Figure 2]. For the gap-overlap prosaccade task, analyses revealed shorter latencies in the gap than overlap condition [Ftrial(1,52) = 382.13, p < .001; Figure 2]. However, there was no overall group difference [Fgroup(1,52) = .10, p = .76] or differential effect of gap versus overlap trials between groups [Fgroup × trial(1,52) = .02, p = .89].

Figure 3 shows

Discussion

The established inability to suppress context-inappropriate responses on antisaccade tasks in schizophrenia is widely considered to reflect prefrontal cortical dysfunction that impairs the voluntary inhibition of prepotent responses, akin to disinhibition of a visual grasp reflex. Using no-gap and gap-overlap paradigms to manipulate the balance between neurophysiological mechanisms supporting sustained visual attention and the automatic shift of attention to new visual stimuli, we report the

References (44)

  • W.M. Perlstein et al.

    Prefrontal cortex dysfunction mediates deficits in working memory and prepotent responding in schizophrenia

    Biol Psychiatry

    (2003)
  • P. Salgado-Pineda et al.

    Decreased cerebral activation during CPT performance: Structural and functional deficits in schizophrenic patients

    Neuroimage

    (2004)
  • M.I. Posner

    Cognitive Neuroscience of Attention

    (2004)
  • C. Pierrot-Deseilligny et al.

    Decisional role of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in ocular motor behaviour

    Brain

    (2003)
  • T. Moore et al.

    Control of eye movements and spatial attention

    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

    (2001)
  • S. Funahashi et al.

    Prefrontal neuronal activity in rhesus monkeys performing a delayed anti-saccade task

    Nature

    (1993)
  • D.P. Munoz et al.

    Look away: The anti-saccade task and the voluntary control of eye movement

    Nat Rev Neurosci

    (2004)
  • B.A. Clementz et al.

    When does the brain inform the eyes whether and where to move the eyes? An EEG study in humans

    Cereb Cortex

    (2007)
  • J.A. Sweeney et al.

    Positron emission tomography study of voluntary saccadic eye movements and spatial working memory

    J Neurophysiol

    (1996)
  • S.B. Hutton et al.

    The antisaccade task as a research tool in psychopathology: A critical review

    Psychophysiology

    (2006)
  • B.A. Clementz et al.

    Saccadic system functioning among schizophrenia patients and their first-degree biological relatives

    J Abnorm Psychol

    (1994)
  • D.C. Gooding et al.

    Temporal stability of saccadic task performance in schizophrenia and bipolar patients

    Psychol Med

    (2004)
  • Cited by (52)

    • Medication adversely impacts visually-guided eye movements in Parkinson's disease

      2022, Clinical Neurophysiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      In contrast, compared to the step paradigm, the overlap paradigm results in prolonged latencies due to the fixation offset occurring after target onset (Saslow, 1967), which maintains activity related to the central foveated target thus making it harder to disengage visual attention from the center. Therefore, the paradigm effect gives insight into the balance between maintaining and shifting attention and gaze (Munoz and Fecteau, 2002; Reilly et al., 2008). This balance between maintaining and shifting attention may be regulated by the top-down descending inputs to the superior colliculus from the cortex, both directly and indirectly through the basal ganglia (Helminski and Segraves, 2003; Hikosaka et al., 2000; Munoz, 2002; Pierrot-Deseilligny et al., 2002).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text