Research ReportEstradiol modulates brainstem catecholaminergic cell groups and projections to the auditory forebrain in a female songbird
Introduction
Lengthening days in the early spring mark the beginning of a chain of events that affect hormones and behavior in many species. Even a small change in photoperiod can trigger shifts in the hormonal state of songbirds such as white-throated sparrows (Zonotrichia albicollis), causing their gonads to grow (Wolfson, 1958, Shank, 1959). The resulting marked change in gonadal steroids during this time supports the development of seasonally appropriate reproductive behavior. For example, in female songbirds, behavioral responses to male song change dramatically when estradiol (E2) levels rise. During the breeding season, females of many species respond to audio recordings of male song with a stereotyped behavior known as copulation solicitation display (CSD); during the non-breeding season, however, females do not perform CSDs even when presented with song that in the breeding season would be highly stimulatory (Kern and King, 1972, Moore, 1983). This robust change in behavioral responses to sociosexual auditory stimuli suggests that E2 may act within the auditory system to affect the processing of auditory signals.
Song-induced auditory responses in the brain are often studied by quantifying the expression of the immediate early gene zenk (zif-268, egr-1, ngfi-a, and krox24; Mello et al., 1992) or its protein product (ZENK; Mello and Ribeiro, 1998). This “genomic response” to song is well-characterized in males and females of many species, including zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata; Bailey et al., 2002, Mello and Clayton, 1994, Mello et al., 1992, Stripling et al., 2001), canaries (Serinus canaria; Leitner et al., 2005, Ribeiro et al., 1998, Terleph et al., 2006), and European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris; Gentner et al., 2001, Sockman et al., 2002). The magnitude of this response in the caudomedial nidopallium (NCM), a region of the auditory forebrain, is greater in response to song than to synthetic tones, and greater to conspecific than heterospecific song (Mello and Clayton, 1994, Stripling et al., 2001). Social factors known to affect the magnitude of behavioral responses, such as song complexity, dialect, or familiarity to the listener, also affect the genomic response (Gentner et al., 2001, Leitner et al., 2005, Maney et al., 2003, Sockman et al., 2002, Terpstra et al., 2006). Thus, the magnitude of this response relates to the behavioral relevance of the stimulus.
Just as E2 appears to alter the behavioral relevance of song, it also affects song-induced genomic responses in the auditory forebrain. We previously showed that the selectivity of the genomic response in NCM requires breeding levels of E2. In non-breeding female white-throated sparrows with low levels of plasma E2, the genomic response to hearing songs is not distinguishable from the response to hearing frequency-matched tones (Maney et al., 2006). The plastic nature of auditory selectivity suggests that E2 modulates auditory pathways and processing centers to promote recognition of and attention to conspecific song during the breeding season.
Increased auditory selectivity could be related to one or more cognitive processes that depend on catecholamines (CAs). CAs, particularly norepinephrine from the locus coeruleus, are widely known to shape the response properties of sensory networks to alter selectivity (see Hurley et al., 2004 for review) and may play a role in selective attention (see Aston-Jones and Cohen, 2005, for review). In songbirds, CA projections to the forebrain have been hypothesized to affect the auditory processing of as well as behavioral responses to behaviorally relevant social signals such as song (e.g., Appeltants et al., 2002a, Appeltants et al., 2002b, Appeltants et al., 2005, Bharati and Goodson, 2006, Cardin and Schmidt, 2004, Maney and Ball, 2003, Riters and Pawlisch, 2007). In female canaries, noradrenergic denervation of the forebrain causes a reduction in CSD behavior along with an apparent deficit in selective attention to sexually stimulating song (Appeltants et al., 2002b). If CA fibers and their sources are sensitive to gonadal steroids, they may mediate seasonal changes in selective attention and auditory responses to these signals. A large literature indicates that in mammals, CA neurons are in fact targets of E2. E2 treatment increases mRNA for tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) and dopamine beta-hydroxylase (DBH), rate-limiting enzymes in the synthesis of CAs, in brainstem CA cell groups (Pau et al., 2000, Serova et al., 2002, Serova et al., 2004). E2 may also affect developing CA cells; E2 treatment promotes the expression of TH mRNA as well as neurite branching in cultured embryonic midbrain cells (Ivanova and Beyer, 2003, Kuppers et al., 2000). Kritzer and Kohama, 1998, Kritzer and Kohama, 1999 reported that in rhesus monkeys, TH and DBH immunoreactivity (IR) in the forebrain is depleted by ovariectomy and restored by ovarian hormone replacement. In songbirds, forebrain CA turnover as well as adrenergic receptor density are modulated seasonally by gonadal steroids (Barclay and Harding, 1990, Riters et al., 2002). CAs therefore represent an excellent candidate system for mediating seasonal changes in auditory and behavioral responses to sociosexual stimuli.
In the present study, we looked for evidence that the E2-induced plasticity in the auditory forebrain described by Maney et al. (2006) is mediated by CAs. Our first hypothesis was that E2 alters the CA innervation of the auditory forebrain as well as the possible sources of this innervation in the brainstem. To test this hypothesis, we measured the effects of E2 treatment on the density of TH-IR innervation of NCM as well as the number of TH-IR cells in brainstem CA cell groups (Fig. 1). Although the exact origin of CA fibers in NCM (Fig. 2) is currently unknown, tract tracing studies have demonstrated that CA cell groups A6, A9, A10, and A11 project to areas of the canary forebrain involved in song learning and production (Appeltants et al., 2000, Appeltants et al., 2002a). Thus, it is plausible that CA innervation of NCM originates in one or more of these regions. We predicted E2-dependent changes in TH-IR both in NCM and in these CA brainstem cell groups.
Our second hypothesis was that these CA cells directly regulate forebrain selectivity by altering their activity, and therefore CA synaptic activity in the forebrain, during song perception. To test this hypothesis, we quantified transcription activity, a putative measure of depolarization activity (see Mello et al., 2004), by counting the number of TH-IR cells that were immunopositive for ZENK protein in each CA cell group of the brainstem after the birds listened to song or tone stimuli. We predicted that the zenk response in CA cells would parallel and therefore possibly contribute toward E2-dependent selectivity in NCM (Maney et al., 2006).
Section snippets
Behavioral analysis
Only E2-treated birds who heard songs performed CSDs during the stimulus presentation, which confirmed that the implants raised plasma E2 levels and that the tones were not interpreted as songs (Maney et al., 2006). Within this group (n = 6), there were no significant correlations between CSD behavior and any of the neural variables we quantified, demonstrating that the variation in these variables was not completely explained by variation in CSD behavior.
Effects of E2 treatment on TH immunoreactivity
A MANOVA revealed a significant effect of
Discussion
The present study is an extension of work by Maney et al. (2006), who reported that in female white-throated sparrows, E2 treatment increased selectivity of the zenk response in the auditory forebrain. In that study, the zenk response was selective for songs vs. synthetic tones only in females with breeding-like levels of E2. A possible explanation for a sharpening of the zenk response is that E2 treatment affects CA innervation of that region. We report here that E2 treatment increased the
Animals
All procedures involving animals were approved by the Emory University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Twenty-three female white-throated sparrows were collected in mist-nets on the campus of Emory University in Atlanta, GA during November 2004. A small blood sample was taken, and sex was confirmed by PCR analysis using primers P2 and P8 of Griffiths et al. (1998). The birds were housed in the Emory animal care facility in walk-in flight cages and supplied ad libitum with food and
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Ellen Cho, Susie Lackey, Henry Lange, and Mark Wilson for technical assistance and advice, and to Robert Liu and Darryl Neill for comments on an earlier version of the manuscript. We also thank Rashidat Ayantungi, Tulasi Ghimirey, and Marsha Howard for expert animal care. This work was supported by NSF IBN-0346984, HHMI 52003727, and the Center for Behavioral Neuroscience.
References (62)
- et al.
Identification of the origin of catecholaminergic inputs to HVc in canaries by retrograde tract tracing combined with tyrosine hydroxylase
J. Chem. Neuroanat.
(2000) - et al.
Noradrenergic control of auditory information processing in female canaries
Behav. Brain Res.
(2002) - et al.
The effect of auditory distractors on song discrimination in male canaries (Serinus canaria)
Behav. Processes
(2005) - et al.
Androstenedione modulation of monoamine levels and turnover in hypothalamic and vocal control nuclei in the male zebra finch: steroid effects on brain monoamines
Brain Res.
(1988) - et al.
Differential modulation of monoamine levels and turnover rates by estrogen and/or androgen in hypothalamic and vocal control nuclei of male zebra finches
Brain Res.
(1990) - et al.
The monoamine innervation of rat cerebral cortex: synaptic and nonsynaptic axon terminals
Neuroscience
(1978) - et al.
Fos responses of dopamine neurons to sociosexual stimuli in male zebra finches
Neuroscience
(2006) - et al.
Avian bulbospinal pathways: anterograde and retrograde studies of cells of origin, funicular trajectories and laminar terminations
Prog. Brain Res.
(1982) - et al.
Responses of primate locus coeruleus neurons to simple and complex sensory stimuli
Brain Res. Bull.
(1988) - et al.
A matter of focus: monoaminergic modulation of stimulus coding in mammalian sensory networks
Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.
(2004)