Elsevier

NeuroImage

Volume 52, Issue 4, 1 October 2010, Pages 1521-1527
NeuroImage

Significant decreases in frontal and temporal [11C]-raclopride binding after THC challenge

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.04.274Get rights and content

Abstract

Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) increases prefrontal cortical dopamine release in animals, but this is yet to be examined in humans. In man, striatal dopamine release can be indexed using [11C]-raclopride positron emission tomography (PET), and recent reports suggest that cortical [11C]-raclopride binding may also be sensitive to dopaminergic challenges. Using an existing dataset we examined whether THC alters [11C]-raclopride binding potential (BPND) in cortical regions. Thirteen healthy volunteers underwent two [11C]-raclopride PET scans following either oral 10 mg THC or placebo. Significant areas of decreased cortical [11C]-raclopride BPND were identified using whole brain voxel-wise analysis and quantified using a region of interest (ROI) ratio analysis. Effect of blood flow on binding was estimated using a simplified reference tissue model analysis. Results were compared to [11C]-raclopride test–retest reliability in the ROIs identified using a separate cohort of volunteers. Voxel-wise analysis identified three significant clusters of decreased [11C]-raclopride BPND after THC in the right middle frontal gyrus, left superior frontal gyrus and left superior temporal gyrus. Decreases in [11C]-raclopride BPND following THC were greater than test–retest variability in these ROIs. R1, an estimate of blood flow, significantly decreased in the left superior frontal gyrus in the THC condition but was unchanged in the other ROIs. Decreased frontal binding significantly correlated to catechol-o-methyl transferase (COMT) val108 status. We have demonstrated for the first time significant decreases in bilateral frontopolar cortical and left superior temporal gyrus [11C]-raclopride binding after THC. The interpretation of these findings in relation to prefrontal dopamine release is discussed.

Introduction

Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the main psychoactive component of cannabis sativa, increases prefrontal cortical dopamine levels in animal microdialysis studies (Chen et al., 1990, Jentsch et al., 1997, Pistis et al., 2002) and also increases the firing rate of dopaminergic prefrontal cortical neurones in vitro (Diana et al., 1998). Prefrontal cognitive efficiency is in part dependent on the maintenance of stable prefrontal dopamine levels (Williams and Castner, 2006) and stable prefrontal dopamine levels may also contribute to higher brain functions relevant to motivation and emotion (Nieoullon and Coquerel, 2003). Taken together, modulation of processes associated with prefrontal cortical function, such as verbal recall, attention and motivation (D'Souza et al., 2008), following THC may occur as a result of the effect of THC on dopaminergic neurones (Wilson and Nicoll, 2002). These studies predict that THC administration increases dopamine release in the human prefrontal cortex. However this has not yet been examined in the human brain in vivo.

In humans, change in striatal dopamine levels can be estimated in vivo using [11C]-raclopride positron emission tomography (PET). Extracellular dopamine release is thought to increase competition between [11C]-raclopride and dopamine for dopamine D2/3 receptor occupancy and promotes receptor internalisation, thus decreasing [11C]-raclopride binding (Goggi et al., 2007, Laruelle, 2000, Skinbjerg et al., 2010). Whilst significant but small decreases in striatal [11C]-raclopride binding have been reported after acute administration of inhaled THC (Bossong et al., 2009), this result was not replicated in a larger cohort of volunteers following an acute challenge with oral THC (Stokes et al., 2009).

In addition to decreases in [11C]-raclopride binding potential in the striatum, decreases in [11C]-raclopride binding potential have also been observed in extrastriatal regions following drug or behavioural challenges which may increase extracellular dopamine. Specifically, intravenous methamphetamine decreases [11C]-raclopride binding in the prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortices (Piccini et al., 2003), and decreased binding has also been reported in frontal cortical motor areas during a motor sequence learning task (Garraux et al., 2007), and in the anterior cingulate cortex during a spatial working memory task (Sawamoto et al., 2008) and a Tower of London planning task (Egerton et al., 2009). There is however some debate about the validity of using [11C]-raclopride PET to index changes in cortical dopamine levels (Egerton et al., 2009), as [11C]-raclopride binding is far lower in cortical than striatal areas due to the lower density of D2 receptors, resulting in low signal to noise ratios and poor accuracy. Whilst decreases in cortical [11C]-raclopride binding potential may reflect increased dopamine, it is also possible that they may simply reflect false positive findings, due to low within-subjects reliability of extrastriatal measurement. Alternatively, the observed decreases in [11C]-raclopride binding potential may be ‘true’ decreases, but arising consequential to non-dopaminergic processes—such as differences in radiotracer washout or delivery under challenge compared with control conditions due to blood flow effects.

In an exploratory voxel level, whole brain analysis of an existing dataset (Stokes et al., 2009), we investigated whether THC administration was associated with decreases in [11C]-raclopride binding potential in extrastriatal brain regions. Following detection of significant clusters of decreased [11C]-raclopride binding potential in the THC compared to placebo condition, we compared the magnitude of change detected to the test–retest reliability of [11C]-raclopride in identical regions of interest in a separate cohort of volunteers, to estimate to what extent these findings differed from chance-level observations. For estimation of change in [11C]-raclopride binding potential following THC administration, we compared results of two analytical methods with differing resilience to concomitant changes in blood flow, the equilibrium ratio method (Carson et al., 1997) and kinetic modelling using the simplified reference tissue model (SRTM) (Lammertsma and Hume, 1996). To further explore the extent to which there may be a dopaminergic basis to the observed changes, we also determined whether there was any relationship between THC induced change in binding potential and catechol-o-methyl transferase (COMT) val108/158met polymorphism.

Section snippets

Participants

All volunteers were assessed by a psychiatrist to exclude current or previous significant mental health disorders and alcohol or drug dependency as defined by DSM-IV, serious physical illness, past neurological disorders or previous use of psychotropic medications. All volunteers gave written informed consent for the study, which was approved both by the Hammersmith Research Ethics Committee and the Administration of Radioactive Substances Advisory Committee, UK.

[11C]-raclopride radiochemistry

Details of the THC challenge [11C]-raclopride dataset radiochemistry are contained within Stokes et al. (2009). For the THC challenge dataset, there were no significant differences between placebo and THC scans for either injected dose (p < 0.7) or the amount of cold ligand injected (p < 0.22). For the test–retest scans the mean injected radioactive dose for scan 1 was 455 MBq (49) and for scan 2 was 483 (24). The mean amount of cold raclopride ligand injected for scan 1 was 3.53 (1) µg and for scan

Discussion

This is the first study to demonstrate significant decreases in cortical [11C]-raclopride binding potential after administration of THC. The THC-induced decreases in [11C]-raclopride BPND, located in the bilateral frontopolar cortex (Brodmann area 10) and the left superior temporal cortex, showed similar effect sizes using both ratio and STRM analyses and were greater in magnitude than the [11C]-raclopride test–retest variability for these areas. Furthermore, these changes did not correlate

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Medical Research Council, UK; NIHR BRC for Mental Health at South London and Maudsley NHS Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, UK.

References (42)

  • P.R. Stokes et al.

    Can recreational doses of THC produce significant dopamine release in the human striatum?

    Neuroimage

    (2009)
  • N.P. Verhoeff et al.

    A simple method to measure baseline occupancy of neostriatal dopamine D2 receptors by dopamine in vivo in healthy subjects

    Neuropsychopharmacology

    (2001)
  • G.V. Williams et al.

    Under the curve: critical issues for elucidating D1 receptor function in working memory

    Neuroscience

    (2006)
  • M.G. Bossong et al.

    Delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol induces dopamine release in the human striatum

    Neuropsychopharmacology

    (2009)
  • A. Breier et al.

    Schizophrenia is associated with elevated amphetamine-induced synaptic dopamine concentrations: evidence from a novel positron emission tomography method

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (1997)
  • M. Brett et al.

    The problem of functional localization in the human brain

    Nat. Rev. Neurosci.

    (2002)
  • R.E. Carson et al.

    Quantification of amphetamine-induced changes in [11C]raclopride binding with continuous infusion

    J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab.

    (1997)
  • J. Chen et al.

    Delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol enhances presynaptic dopamine efflux in medial prefrontal cortex

    Eur. J. Pharmacol.

    (1990)
  • M. Diana et al.

    Increase in meso-prefrontal dopaminergic activity after stimulation of CB1 receptors by cannabinoids

    Eur. J. Neurosci.

    (1998)
  • D.C. D'Souza et al.

    Effects of haloperidol on the behavioral, subjective, cognitive, motor, and neuroendocrine effects of Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol in humans

    Psychopharmacology (Berl)

    (2008)
  • C.J. Endres et al.

    Kinetic modeling of [11C]raclopride: combined PET-microdialysis studies

    J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab.

    (1997)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text