Elsevier

NeuroImage

Volume 54, Issue 3, 1 February 2011, Pages 2534-2538
NeuroImage

Attention to aversive emotion and specific activation of the right insula and right somatosensory cortex

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.010Get rights and content

Abstract

The evaluation of emotional stimuli is based on different levels of information processing, ranging from rather automatic processes to focused attention to the emotional relevance of stimuli. The role of specific brain areas for these processes is a matter of debate. In this event-related fMRI study, we varied the information processing mode of participants exposed to aversive and neutral pictures. Based on four different tasks, participants' attentional focus onto the emotional quality of the stimuli and the own emotional involvement was increased systematically across tasks. Regardless of task, stronger activation to threatening vs. neutral pictures was found in several regions such as the amygdala, anterior insula, anterior cingulate cortex, primary somatosensory cortex and medial prefrontal cortex. However, there was a parametric increase of activation with increasing attention to one's own emotion specifically in the right posterior insula and right primary and secondary somatosensory cortex, i.e. in areas implicated in self-awareness of a person's own body. These findings are in accordance with theories suggesting a crucial role of the perception of bodily states for emotional experiences.

Research Highlights

►Activation in insula/ somatosensory cortex correlates with attention to emotion. ►No comparable results in amygdala, ACC, or MPFC. ►Findings suggest a crucial role of bodily states for emotional experiences.

Introduction

The processing of emotional stimuli is associated with different stages of information processing. While implicit processing modes are related to rather automatic responses to emotional stimuli, explicit processing requires that subjects' attention is directed to the emotional significance of stimuli or to one's own emotional involvement, i.e. to own feelings (e.g., LeDoux, 1996, Damasio, 1999). These different levels of information processing seem to depend partially on different neural systems (e.g., LeDoux, 1996, Damasio, 1999, Phan et al., 2002). Several prefrontal areas and the anterior cingulate cortex were suggested to be involved in cognitive-emotional interactions, such as certain high level appraisal processes, as well as in the generation and regulation of emotional responses (e.g., Lane et al., 1998, Phan et al., 2002, Ochsner et al., 2004, Straube et al., 2006, Straube et al., 2009a). In contrast, subcortical areas such as the amygdala have been proposed to mediate the rapid processing of emotional, especially of threatening stimuli, given a minimum of processing resources (Vuilleumier et al., 2001, Pessoa et al., 2002, Straube et al., 2007).

Besides these areas, brain regions that are involved in the direct representation of bodily states, such as the insula and the somatosensory cortex, were also proposed to be relevant for emotion processing (Damasio, 1999; Adolphs et al., 2000; Craig, 2002, Craig, 2009). This hypothesis is based on the idea that the perception of real or simulated bodily responses is an important factor for emotional experiences (James, 1884, Damasio, 1999, Craig, 2002, Craig, 2009). While the anterior insula has been suggested to serve as an integrative center for the representation and evaluation of interoceptive information, posterior areas of the insula, and the primary and secondary somatosensory cortex are more strongly involved in general awareness of the own body and several visceral and somatosensory sensations (Craig, 2002; Adolphs et al., 2000; Karnath et al., 2005, Khalsa et al., 2009).

While several brain areas have been proposed to participate in different aspects of emotion processing, the effect of the processing mode on brain activation warrants further examinations. To elucidate the specific role of a brain region as a function of the information processing mode, it is necessary to systematically vary of the level of evaluation of emotional stimuli and to control for other factors (see also Lieberman et al., 2007). In the present event-related fMRI-study, we systematically increased subjects' attention to one's own emotional involvement by means of four different tasks. If the experience of emotion is closely linked to the perception of bodily responses, increasing attention to own feelings should be associated with increased activation of relevant brain structures, such as the insula or the somatosensory cortex, which are involved in the processing of bodily states. In contrast, those areas that are involved in other or more general processes should not show an increase of brain activation across tasks.

Section snippets

Subjects

Sixteen healthy, right-handed, female volunteers (mean age: mean = 20.7 years, range = 18–28 years) provided informed consent to participate in the study. All participants had normal or corrected-to-normal vision. All experimental procedures were approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Jena.

Paradigm

Stimuli consisted of 20 threat-related and 20 neutral pictures taken from the International Affective Picture System (IAPS; Lang et al., 1999). In the center of the pictures either animals, plants,

Behavioral data

Accuracy, i.e., the number of correct responses, was high during both the Level-1 (95.18 ± 1.52 % and 96.25 ± 1.10% for threat-related and neutral pictures) and the Level-2 task (95.18 ± 1.52 % and 97.14 ± 0.51 % for threat-related and neutral pictures) and did not differ significantly between valence categories for either task [t = 0.86 and t = 1.49; each analysis: p > 0.05]). Analysis of subjective judgements showed that negative but not neutral pictures were classified as threatening (Level-3: 92.93 ± 2.92

Discussion

This study investigated the effects of the information processing mode on brain activation to emotional vs. neutral pictures. We used a design in which we kept all experimental conditions constant, with the exception of the task instruction. By means of different tasks, the attentional focus of the participants onto the emotional quality of stimuli and the own emotional involvement was increased systematically across tasks. The results show a main effect of emotion in several areas, including

References (36)

  • T. Straube et al.

    Time course of amygdala activation during aversive conditioning depends on attention

    Neuroimage

    (2007)
  • T. Straube et al.

    Differential amygdala activation to negative and positive emotional pictures during an indirect task

    Behav. Brain Res.

    (2008)
  • T. Straube et al.

    Dynamic activation of the anterior cingulate cortex during anticipatory anxiety

    Neuroimage

    (2009)
  • T. Straube et al.

    No impairment of recognition and experience of disgust in a patient with a right-hemispheric lesion of the insula and basal ganglia

    Neuropsychologia

    (2010)
  • P. Vuilleumier et al.

    Effects of attention and emotion on face processing in the human brain: an event-related fMRI study

    Neuron

    (2001)
  • R. Adolphs et al.

    A role for somatosensory cortices in the visual recognition of emotion as revealed by three-dimensional lesion mapping

    J. Neurosci.

    (2000)
  • A.D. Craig

    How do you feel? Interoception: the sense of the physiological condition of the body

    Nat. Rev. Neurosci.

    (2002)
  • A.D. Craig

    How do you feel—now? The anterior insula and human awareness

    Nat. Rev. Neurosci.

    (2009)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text