Elsevier

NeuroImage

Volume 160, 15 October 2017, Pages 124-139
NeuroImage

From connectome to cognition: The search for mechanism in human functional brain networks

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.01.060Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Mechanisms are needed to link descriptive network maps to cognitive function.

  • Network mechanisms involve explanatory interactions amongst brain regions.

  • Task manipulations and advanced analytic methods can reveal network mechanisms.

  • Each mechanism is characterized by its spatial, temporal and directional components.

  • Cognition emerges from mechanisms at macro network as well as micro cellular levels.

Abstract

Recent developments in functional connectivity research have expanded the scope of human neuroimaging, from identifying changes in regional activation amplitudes to detailed mapping of large-scale brain networks. However, linking network processes to a clear role in cognition demands advances in the theoretical frameworks, algorithms, and experimental approaches applied. This would help evolve the field from a descriptive to an explanatory state, by targeting network interactions that can mechanistically account for cognitive effects. In the present review, we provide an explicit framework to aid this search for “network mechanisms”, which anchors recent methodological advances in functional connectivity estimation to a renewed emphasis on careful experimental design. We emphasize how this framework can address specific questions in network neuroscience. These span ambiguity over the cognitive relevance of resting-state networks, how to characterize task-evoked and spontaneous network dynamics, how to identify directed or “effective” connections, and how to apply multivariate pattern analysis at the network level. In parallel, we apply the framework to highlight the mechanistic interaction of network components that remain “stable” across task domains and more “flexible” components associated with on-task reconfiguration. By emphasizing the need to structure the use of diverse analytic approaches with sound experimentation, our framework promotes an explanatory mapping between the workings of the cognitive mind and the large-scale network mechanisms of the human brain.

Section snippets

A framework for mechanistic discovery in network neuroscience

Since the emergence of human functional neuroimaging, researchers have sought the optimal analytic framework to link non-invasively acquired brain data to cognitive function. An initial focus on changes in regional activation amplitudes (Friston et al., 1994, Kanwisher, 2010) has given way to examination of functional connectivity (FC) between regions and large-scale networks of regions (Biswal et al., 1995, Medaglia et al., 2015, Petersen and Sporns, 2015, Raichle, 2010, Sporns, 2014). This

Implications of network mechanisms in advancing human FC research

To summarize the core tenets of our framework: i) network mechanisms are identified as interactions amongst brain regions that explain cognitive states; ii) experimental manipulations (both cognitive and neural) are key in reliably linking network interactions to a clear explanatory role in cognition; iii) task manipulations can be combined with recently developed FC estimation algorithms to characterize distinct functional components of each mechanism (spatial, temporal and directional); iv)

Clarifying the cognitive relevance of resting-state networks

Thus far, the dominant focus in human FC research has been on mapping spatial patterns of fMRI BOLD synchronization in the resting state. Computing the Pearson's correlation coefficient between pairwise regional (or voxel-wise) BOLD time series, in the absence of a controlled task, has yielded a highly reproducible set of large-scale networks spanning many domains of cognitive function. These canonical resting-state networks include low-level sensory and motor networks (Biswal et al., 1995,

Capturing functionally relevant network dynamics

In keeping with the dominant approach in FC research, the previous section characterized the cognitive relevance of resting-state networks in terms of a single functional component – spatial topology i.e. the spatial pattern of connections between brain regions. However, it is likely that temporal components of resting-state networks also provide critical insight into their function i.e. the spatial pattern of connections and when that pattern emerges during cognition (see Fig. 1b). The

Revealing asymmetries in activity propagation via directed functional connectivity

The majority of research into human brain networks has focused on one FC estimation algorithm – pairwise Pearson's correlation computed between regional time series – which conveys whether two regions A and B communicate in a general “undirected” sense (connectivity A-B). This is especially true for fMRI connectivity studies, whereas MEG/EEG connectivity has been commonly computed via both correlation and undirected coherence approaches. In contrast, a class of “directed” or “effective” FC

Increasing the sensitivity of network components via multivariate pattern analysis

Another feature of the standard FC estimation pipeline is the extraction of averaged time series from isolated brain voxels or as the average across neighboring voxels within putative brain regions. Extracting such “univariate” estimates of brain activation might occlude FC mechanisms encoded by “multivariate” representational patterns amongst multiple voxels or areas of cortex. Indeed, the application of multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) methods to multi-unit recordings in animals has

Summary of key challenges and future directions

Whilst the preceding sections have detailed numerous advances in the study of human brain networks, a number of key challenges are posed to the search for network mechanisms. Firstly, there remains a broad need for more principled validations of FC estimation strategies. Confidence in available methodologies is a necessary precursor to generating meaningful mechanistic insight from them, and there remains much ambiguity over optimal preprocessing steps (e.g. minimization of artifacts), choice

Conclusion

The field of human functional connectivity research is tantalizingly poised. Recent technical and methodological advances have opened new avenues of inquiry, and the challenge now is to develop optimal strategies to navigate these avenues without getting lost in the labyrinth of “big data”. Our goal in this review was to demonstrate that the ongoing feedback loop between FC method development and insight into cognitive function would be fine-tuned by a specific focus on identifying network

Conflict of interest

None.

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge support by the US National Institutes of Health under awards K99-R00 MH096801 and R01 MH109520. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of any of the funding agencies.

References (165)

  • G. Deshpande et al.

    Effect of hemodynamic variability on Granger causality analysis of fMRI

    NeuroImage

    (2010)
  • L.E. Dobrunz et al.

    Heterogeneity of release probability, facilitation, and depletion at central synapses

    Neuron

    (1997)
  • I. Dumontheil et al.

    Influence of the COMT Genotype on Working Memory and Brain Activity Changes During Development

    Biol. Psychiatry

    (2011)
  • J.H. Duyn

    The future of ultra-high field MRI and fMRI for study of the human brain

    NeuroImage

    (2012)
  • J.A. Fodor et al.

    Connectionism and cognitive architecture: a critical analysis

    Cognition

    (1988)
  • M.D. Fox et al.

    Measuring and manipulating brain connectivity with resting state functional connectivity magnetic resonance imaging (fcMRI) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)

    NeuroImage

    (2012)
  • P. Fries

    A mechanism for cognitive dynamics: neuronal communication through neuronal coherence

    Trends Cogn. Sci.

    (2005)
  • K.J. Friston et al.

    Dynamic causal modelling

    NeuroImage

    (2003)
  • K.M. Gates et al.

    Group search algorithm recovers effective connectivity maps for individuals in homogeneous and heterogeneous samples

    NeuroImage

    (2012)
  • L. Geerligs et al.

    Functional connectivity and structural covariance between regions of interest can be measured more accurately using multivariate distance correlation

    NeuroImage

    (2016)
  • M.R. Gilmartin et al.

    Prefrontal cortical regulation of fear learning

    Trends Neurosci.

    (2014)
  • D.A. Handwerker et al.

    Variation of BOLD hemodynamic responses across subjects and brain regions and their effects on statistical analyses

    NeuroImage

    (2004)
  • M. Havlicek et al.

    Dynamic modeling of neuronal responses in fMRI using cubature Kalman filtering

    NeuroImage

    (2011)
  • J.-D. Haynes

    A primer on pattern-based approaches to fMRI: principles, pitfalls, and perspectives

    Neuron

    (2015)
  • J.F. Hipp et al.

    BOLD fMRI correlation reflects frequency-specific neuronal correlation

    Curr. Biol.

    (2015)
  • D.K. Jones et al.

    White matter integrity, fiber count, and other fallacies: the do's and don’ts of diffusion MRI

    NeuroImage

    (2013)
  • J.-R. King et al.

    Characterizing the dynamics of mental representations: the temporal generalization method

    Trends Cogn. Sci.

    (2014)
  • P.J. Kohler et al.

    Pattern classification precedes region-average hemodynamic response in early visual cortex

    NeuroImage

    (2013)
  • D. Kumaran et al.

    What learning systems do intelligent agents need? Complementary learning systems theory updated

    Trends Cogn. Sci.

    (2016)
  • A.R. Laird et al.

    Networks of task co-activations

    NeuroImage

    (2013)
  • F. Lopes da Silva

    Neural mechanisms underlying brain waves: from neural membranes to networks

    Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol.

    (1991)
  • D.G. McLaren et al.

    A generalized form of context-dependent psychophysiological interactions (gPPI): a comparison to standard approaches

    NeuroImage

    (2012)
  • E.A. Allen et al.

    Tracking whole-brain connectivity dynamics in the resting state

    Cereb. Cortex

    (2014)
  • G. Aston-Jones et al.

    An integrative theory of locus coeruleus-norepinephrine function: adaptive gain and optimal performance

    Annu. Rev. Neurosci.

    (2005)
  • A.P. Baker et al.

    Fast transient networks in spontaneous human brain activity

    eLife

    (2014)
  • J. Barredo et al.

    Ventral fronto-temporal pathway supporting cognitive control of episodic memory retrieval

    Cereb. Cortex

    (2015)
  • D.S. Bassett et al.

    Learning-induced autonomy of sensorimotor systems

    Nat. Neurosci.

    (2015)
  • M. Bedau

    Weak emergence

  • B. Biswal et al.

    Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo-planar MRI

    Magn. Reson. Med.

    (1995)
  • M.J. Brookes et al.

    Investigating the electrophysiological basis of resting state networks using magnetoencephalography

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA

    (2011)
  • E. Bullmore et al.

    Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems

    Nat. Rev. Neurosci.

    (2009)
  • W.A. Catterall et al.

    The Hodgkin-Huxley Heritage: from Channels to Circuits

    J. Neurosci.

    (2012)
  • Chen, R.H., Ito, T., Kulkarni, K.R., Cole, M.W., 2016. Large-scale multivariate activation states of the human brain...
  • M.W. Cole et al.

    Prefrontal dynamics underlying rapid instructed task learning reverse with practice

    J. Neurosci.

    (2010)
  • M.W. Cole et al.

    Rapid transfer of abstract rules to novel contexts in human lateral prefrontal cortex

    Front. Hum. Neurosci.

    (2011)
  • Cole, M.W., Ito, T., Bassett, D.S., Schultz, D.H., 2016. Activity flow over resting-state networks shapes cognitive...
  • M.W. Cole et al.

    Rapid instructed task learning: a new window into the human brain's unique capacity for flexible cognitive control

    Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci.

    (2013)
  • M.W. Cole et al.

    The frontoparietal control system: a central role in mental health

    Neuroscientist

    (2014)
  • M.W. Cole et al.

    Multi-task connectivity reveals flexible hubs for adaptive task control

    Nat. Neurosci.

    (2013)
  • M. Corbetta et al.

    Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain

    Nat. Rev. Neurosci.

    (2002)
  • Cited by (76)

    • The mathematical brain at rest

      2023, Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
    • Immunity and cognition

      2023, Translational Neuroimmunology: Neuroinflammation: Volume 7
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text