Do high functioning persons with autism present superior spatial abilities?
Introduction
Autism is a neurodevelopmental disability characterized by deficits in several domains, while, in other domains, affected individuals exhibit performance that exceeds that of typically developing individuals. This enhanced performance characterizes individuals with autism as a group, and should therefore be distinguished from the outstanding performances exhibited by “savant” individuals with autism, which are found only in a restricted subgroup of individuals with autism (Miller, 1999).
Superior performance has been demonstrated by individuals with autism in pitch processing and memory (Bonnel et al., 2003; Heaton et al., 1998, Mottron et al., 2000; Mottron & Burack, 2001), pattern discrimination (Plaisted, O’Riordan, & Baron-Cohen, 1998), the block design subtest of the WAIS (Shah & Frith, 1993; Tymchuk, Simmons, & Neafsey, 1977), the graphic reproduction of impossible figures (Mottron, Belleville, & Ménard, 1999) and detecting embedded figures (Jolliffe & Baron-Cohen, 1997, Shah & Frith, 1983). An enlarged surface of activation in the occipital primary visual areas and an enhanced activation in the ventral occipito-temporal regions during the embedded figure task was found in individuals with autism in a study using fMRI (Ring et al., 1999). In addition, an atypical activation of the primary visual cortex during face perception (Pierce, Muller, Ambrose, Allen, Courchesne, 2001) and significantly more dorsal electrophysiological response during visual selective attention task (Hoeksma, Kemner, Verbaten, & van Engeland, 2002) have also been observed. These findings suggest that autistic individuals use different neural structures in the early processing of visuo-spatial stimuli.
The current study represents the first systematic assessment of spatial abilities in individuals with autism. More precisely, it aims to establish if individuals with autism possess a superior ability to learn the spatial layout of the environment built from an explored environment or from a map. Superior spatial ability in high functioning individuals with autism (HFA) may be expected on the basis of empirical evidence for preserved or superior visual spatial abilities (Minshew et al., 1997, Ozonoff et al., 1991; Rumsey & Hamburger, 1988; Lord, Rutter, & Le Couteur, 1994) and from superior recognition memory of topographical landmarks such as buildings, landscapes, and outdoor scenes (Blair et al., 2002, Cipolotti et al., 1999). In addition, anecdotal reports of restricted interest in maps and bus routes, as well as the ability to detect minimal positional changes in the environment (Wing, 1976) suggest that visuo-spatial abilities are enhanced among persons with autism. The visuo-spatial tasks in which persons with autism present enhanced abilities (e.g., block design) consist typically of reproducing a 2D or 3D model by manipulation of its components and require a high degree of spatio-constructive ability. However, this superiority should not be manifested in those spatial tasks drawing heavily on executive functions, because operations that require conscious manipulation of information, such as planning or switching from one mental set to another, are impaired in autism (Bennetto, Pennington, & Rogers, 1996).
Spatial ability can be decomposed into multiple interrelated functions that will be presented from the more complex to the more elementary. Only the spatio-cognitive aspect of spatial navigation tasks, cognitive mapping, will be investigated in the current study. Cognitive mapping is the process by which an individual acquires, codes, stores, recalls, and decodes information about the relative locations and attributes of the spatial environment (Downs & Stea, 1973). A cognitive map may be grouped under two subheadings: survey map and route map (e.g., Evans & Pezdek, 1980, Hirtle & Hudson, 1991, Thorndyke & Hayes-Roth, 1982). These two types of maps differ in the sources from which they are primarily acquired, the aspects of the environment that they represent, and the tasks in which they are most useful. A survey map is characterized by the knowledge of the global spatial layout from an external perspective, such as a standard road map. This knowledge reflects the individual’s ability to generalize beyond learned routes and to locate the position of objects within a general and fixed frame of reference (Gale, Golledge, Pellegrino, & Doherty, 1990; Hirtle & Hudson, 1991). One easy way to obtain survey knowledge is to look at a plan that provides an overview of a space otherwise too large to be seen in a glance. Frequent travels on a particular route can also lead to survey knowledge (Siegel & White, 1975, Thorndyke & Goldin, 1983). A route map refers to the knowledge of the spatial layout from the ground level observer’s perspective. It refers to the knowledge of sequential locations, or sequence of actions, required to follow a particular route. It includes an explicit representation of decision points (DPs) along the route where turns occur, as well as a representation of the decisions to be taken at each of these points. This knowledge is acquired by navigating through the environment.
FMRI studies during spatial navigation tasks performed in virtual reality environments are informative about the neural networks involved in survey and route map tasks (Shelton & Gabrieli, 2002, Mellet et al., 2000, Ino et al., 2002, Pine et al., 2002). Route tasks are associated with activation of the bilateral medial temporal lobes, including parahippocampal cortex and posterior hippocampus, as well as the bilateral postcentral gyrus (BA 5, 7), the right superior (BA 7) and inferior (BA 40) parietal cortices. Survey tasks are associated with activation of the bilateral fusiform, inferior temporal Gyri (BA 37, 19), bilateral superior parietal cortex (BA 7) and left insula/claustrum (BA 13). Thus, in both route and survey processing, a common network of brain areas is recruited; the survey mapping is associated with a subset of areas also involved by route encoding, though the former operation results in a greater activation in the inferior temporal cortex, postcentral gyrus and posterior superior parietal cortex. These results do not support the hypothesis that route and survey information rely on different neural systems, but suggest a hierarchical relationship between these two spatial functions.
At a lower integration level, spatio-cognitive processes are under the dependence of visuo-perceptual activity. Neuroimaging studies demonstrate two distinct neural pathways that subserve topographical learning. The ventral, occipito-temporal (or “what”) pathways, and more specifically, the inferior temporal cortex in the region of the fusiform gyrus (Moscovitch, Kapur, Kohler, & Houle, 1995) is involved in the recognition of objects. The temporal activation observed in survey knowledge may reflect greater object processing because of the map-like nature of the survey encoding (Tanaka, Saito, Fukada, & Moriya, 1991). Accordingly, maps can be treated as physical objects per se, in addition to providing spatial information. The dorso-lateral, occipito-parietal (or “where”) pathway, and more specifically, the right inferior parietal lobule in the region of the supramarginal gyrus (Moscovitch et al., 1995), is involved in the processing of spatial relations between objects and of spatial locations (Haxby et al., 1991). In addition, the medial temporal lobe is involved in space integration. Specifically, the parahippocampal gyrus is implicated in the encoding of object features and their locations within space (Aggleton & Mishkin, 1983; Maguire et al., 1996, Maguire et al., 1998, McCarthy et al., 1996).
The current research consisted of five spatial tasks. The first set of tasks was performed in a human-size labyrinth and investigated route map learning (Experiment 1; route learning), route map manipulation (Experiment 2; reversing a route) and survey map (Experiment 3; pointing toward unseen location). The level of information manipulation required by these three tasks ranged from minimal (route learning) to intermediate (reversing a route) and high (reorganizing spatial information to produce a survey map). In addition, each of these tasks was performed at several levels of difficulty in order to assess how the level of difficulty interacts with the spatial cognitive functions involved. The level of difficulty—and therefore, the performance level—of the task is dependent on the storage and manipulation components of working memory (Owen, Downes, Sahakian, Polkey, & Robbins, 1990).
The scale of represented space was manipulated in the second set of tasks in order to assess the ability to transfer spatial knowledge across different scales of space. When spatial layouts are not perceived all at once (e.g., a human-size labyrinth), the subject is confronted with a macro-scale space. Spatial information has to be experienced by integration of perceptual experiences over space and time through the use of memory and reasoning (Montello, 1993; Passini, Rainville, & Habib, 2000; Siegel, 1981). By contrast, spatial cognition at a micro-scale refers to situations where a person can perceive a spatial configuration (e.g., a map) from a single point of view (see McDonald & Pellegrino, 1993 for an overview). It allows direct access to survey knowledge. Experiment 4 involved transforming knowledge acquired through macro-scale learning into a micro-scale representation, through memorizing a human-size path and then drawing it on a sheet of paper. Experiment 5, a route execution task, required the transfer of spatial knowledge acquired from a micro-scale space where global relationships were simultaneously perceived and learned (a map) toward a macro-scale space (human-size labyrinth).
Section snippets
Participants
Two groups of adolescent and adult individuals participated in the study. The clinical group was comprised of 16 participants with autism (HFA; N=11 males) or Asperger syndrome (N=5, four males, one female) with IQ scores in the average range, randomly chosen from the database of the Specialized Clinic for diagnosis and evaluation of Pervasive Developmental Disorders of Rivières-des-Prairies Hospital (Montreal, Canada). The diagnosis of autism was made on the basis of the Autism Diagnosis
Experiment 1: route learning
This task was used to assess route mapping skills. The encoding of spatial information in a route learning task is based on the sequential memorization of the starting point, the decision points, and the destination of the route. This cognitive process is considered to be simple (Tolman, 1948) because it does not require a reorganization of spatial information. However, it varies in difficulty according to the number of decision points of the route to be learned (Hillier et al., 1984, O’Neill,
Experiment 2: reversing a route
Reversing a route requires the manipulation of spatial information by updating this spatial information according to a new sequence of decisions and associated directions. As demonstrated by studies with adults (Kosslyn, Thompson, Kim, & Alpert, 1995) and children (Piaget, Inhelder, & Szeminska, 1948), reversed recall of a route is at a higher level of complexity than direct route learning. Superior spatial abilities, if revealed only at a high level of complexity, should result in the clinical
Experiment 3: pointing toward an imperceptible direction
The pointing task assesses the survey mapping skill of individuals with HFA. In order to perform this task, individuals must combine and reorganize spatial information learned along the route, and elaborate an integrated representation of the labyrinth. Survey knowledge is typically acquired after repeated navigation in an environment. According to animal studies (Etienne et al., 1998, McNaughton et al., 1996, Wehner & Menzel, 1990, Worsley et al., 2001), this task may also rely on path
Experiments 4a and 4b: map drawing in cued recall and free recall
Map-drawing tasks involved the graphic recall of spatial knowledge. This task investigated the content and structure of cognitive maps, and required a scale translation from macro to micro-scale. As a recall task, map-drawing tasks may be realized in a free recall or a cued recall condition. In the free recall condition (Experiment 4a) the participant had to draw a path from memory on a blank sheet. This condition assessed the processing of spatial mental imagery when the visual input is no
Experiment 5: execution of a route learned on a map
This task was aimed at assessing the transfer of spatial knowledge acquired from a map of the labyrinth (micro-scale space) to a human-size labyrinth (macro-scale space). In this task, the source of survey knowledge is a map, where the integration of spatial features can be directly perceived. This transfer of knowledge requires a capacity to adapt the orientation of the memorized map to the orientation of the labyrinth. Accordingly, after the first turn, map and labyrinth orientation are
Additional analysis
The number of individuals exhibiting a consistent success across tasks 4b, 5 and block design was compared in the two groups and was found to be identical. Moreover, the use of non-parametric tests, based on rank rather than raw scores, diminishes the relative weight of subjects displaying extreme scores. In addition, scatter-plots do not show the presence of heterogeneous sub-groups within the experimental group after excluding subjects that display a trade-off. This shows that individuals
Data summary
This series of experiments was aimed at assessing spatial abilities in high functioning participants with autism. In the context of recent findings that this group of individuals is superior to typically developing individuals on several non-social cognitive operations, it was expected that the clinical group would outperform a comparison group matched on full-scale IQ in spatial tasks. Results show that individuals with autism perform all the tasks at a level at least equivalent to a
Acknowledgements
Funding for this project was supplied by a research award from the Canadian Institute of Health Research (CIHR), “Characterizing cognitive deficit in autism and Asperger syndrome” No. 90057 to L. Mottron, S. Belleville, M. Beauregard and R. Schultz. We want to thank Claude Berthiaume, Francine Giroux, and Eric Fimbel for their invaluable help with the data analysis as well as Erick Gallun and Oriane Landry for editing the English version of the text. We also want to thank the participants for
References (82)
- et al.
Visual recognition impairment following medial thalamic lesions in monkeys
Neuropsychologia
(1983) - American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington,...
- et al.
Constructional apraxia and hemispheric locus of lesion
Cortex
(1964) The extreme male brain theory of autism
Trends in Cognitive Science
(2002)- et al.
Intact and impaired memory functions in autism
Child Development
(1996) - et al.
Three-dimensional constructional praxis
Archives of Neurology
(1962) Constructional apraxia and the minor hemisphere
Confinia Neurologica
(1967)- et al.
Motion perception in autism: a “complex” issue. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
(2003) - et al.
Fractionation of visual memory: Agency detection and its impairment in autism
Neuropsychologia
(2002) - et al.
Enhanced pitch sensitivity in individuals with autism: a signal detection analysis
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
(2003)
Fractionation of visual memory: Evidence from a case with multiple neurodevelopmental impairments
Neuropsychologia
Visuo-constructive and visuo-perceptive deficit in patients with unilateral cerebral lesions
Neuropsychologia
Navigation through vector addition
Nature
Path integration in mammals and its interaction with visual landmarks
Journal of Experimental Biology
Cognitive mapping: Knowledge of real-world distance and location information
Journal of Experimental Psychology [Human Learning]
The acquisition and integration of route knowledge in an unfamiliar neighbourhood
Journal of Environmental Psychology
Rapid visual-motion integration deficit in autism
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Dissociation of object and spatial visual processing pathways in human extrastriate cortex
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA
Autism and pitch processing: A precursor for savant musical ability?
Music Perception
Acquisition of spatial knowledge for routes
Journal of Environmental Psychology
Mental navigation in humans is processed in the anterior bank of the parieto-occipital sulcus
Neuroscience Letters
Are people with autism and Asperger syndrome faster than normal on the embedded figures test?
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
The evolution of sex differences in spatial ability
Behavior Neuroscience
Topographical representations of mental images in primary visual cortex
Nature
The autism diagnostic observation schedule-generic: a standard measure of social and communication deficits associated with the spectrum of autism
Journal of Autism and Development Disorders
Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised: A revised version of a diagnostic interview for caregivers of individuals with possible pervasive developmental disorders
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Topographical disorientation following temporal lobe lesions in humans
Neuropsychologia
Knowing where things are Parahippocampal involvement in encoding object locations in virtual large-scale space
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Topographic amnesia: Spatial memory disorder, perceptual dysfunction, or category specific semantic memory impairment?
Journal of Neurological and Neurosurgical Psychiatry
Deciphering the hippocampal polyglot: The hippocampus as a path integration system
Journal of Experimental Biology
Functional anatomy of high-resolution visual mental imagery
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
The savant syndrome: Intellectual impairment and exceptional skill
Psychological Bulletin
Cited by (121)
Deletions of Cacna2d3 in parvalbumin-expressing neurons leads to autistic-like phenotypes in mice
2023, Neurochemistry InternationalAn evaluation of wayfinding abilities in adolescent and young adult males with autism spectrum disorder
2021, Research in Autism Spectrum DisordersCitation Excerpt :To situate our study in the broader contemporary literature of wayfinding in ASD, we conducted two mini meta-analyses. Although Lind et al. (2013, 2014) found significant impairment in survey learning in ASD, the aggregated results adding Caron et al. (2004), Edgin and Pennington (2005) and the current study were less certain about this deficit since the overall effect size was not significant. On the other hand, the aggregated results including Ring, Gaigg, Altgassen et al. (2018), Ring, Gaigg, de Condappa et al. (2018), Caron et al. (2014) and the current study suggested a significant impairment in route learning overall in ASD.
Maternal immune activation targeted to a window of parvalbumin interneuron development improves spatial working memory: Implications for autism
2021, Brain, Behavior, and ImmunityCitation Excerpt :This sub-type specificity of functional outcomes accords with evidence that the gestational timing of MIA influences both the risk of developing different psychiatric disorders in humans (Atladóttir et al., 2010; Limosin et al., 2003; Brown, 2011) and performance on spatial memory tasks in mice (Meyer et al., 2008). The majority of clinical studies show deterioration of spatial working memory (Lai et al., 2017) in neurodevelopmental disorders such as ASD, however paradoxically some studies actually show improvements in specific spatial memory abilities (Caron et al., 2004), and savant abilities reported in ASD commonly involve spatial skills, including map making and direction finding skills (Treffert, 2009). This may hint at a subtype of ASD children who show improvements in specific constructs of spatial memory while other subgroups show deficits.
Abnormal development pattern of the amygdala and hippocampus from childhood to adulthood with autism
2020, Journal of Clinical NeuroscienceImplications of capacity in the classroom: Simplifying tasks for autistic children may not be the answer
2019, Research in Developmental DisabilitiesCitation Excerpt :This is in line with the growing awareness of a range of skills that accompany the condition. For example, we see superior spatial abilities (Caron, Mottron, Rainville, & Chouinard, 2004), reduced susceptibility to change blindness (Smith & Milne, 2009), advantages on visual search paradigms (O’Riordan, 2004; O’Riordan, Plaisted, Driver, & Baron-Cohen, 2001) and better pitch discrimination (Bonnel et al., 2003). Our own research suggests that many of these observations may be underpinned by an increased perceptual capacity in autism (compared to non-autistic people), where autistic people can process more information at any given time (Remington et al., 2009; Remington et al., 2012; Swettenham et al., 2014).
WISC-V and the Personalized Assessment Approach
2019, WISC-V: Clinical Use and Interpretation, Second Edition