Elsevier

Neuropsychologia

Volume 48, Issue 8, July 2010, Pages 2234-2244
Neuropsychologia

An animal model of recognition memory and medial temporal lobe amnesia: History and current issues

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.02.004Get rights and content

Abstract

The medial temporal lobe includes a system of anatomically connected structures that are essential for declarative memory (conscious memory for facts and events). A prominent form of declarative memory is recognition memory (the ability to identify a recently encountered item as familiar). Recognition memory has been frequently assessed in humans and in the experimental animal. This article traces the successful development of an animal model of human medial temporal lobe amnesia, which eventually identified the structures in the medial temporal lobe important for memory. Attention is given to two prominent behavioral paradigms (delayed nonmatching to sample and tests of spontaneous novelty preference).

Introduction

In 1899, at a medical meeting in St. Petersburg, Bekhterev (1900) presented the brain of a patient who had exhibited striking memory problems as the most significant clinical symptom. The primary brain pathology was noted to be bilateral softening of the hippocampus and medial temporal cortex. During the following decades a few clinical case studies also suggested a connection between memory impairment and medial temporal lobe damage (Glees and Griffith, 1952, Grünthal, 1947, Hegglin, 1953). Yet a clear connection between memory and medial temporal lobe function would not be achieved until findings were reported for the noted amnesic patient H.M. (Scoville & Milner, 1957).

Section snippets

H.M. and the modern era of memory research

The modern era of memory research began with the description of patient H.M. by William Beecher Scoville and Brenda Milner (Scoville and Milner, 1957, Squire, 2009). H.M. had an extensive history of minor and major seizures that were unresponsive to antiepileptic medication. He had minor seizures beginning at 10 years of age, and major seizures began to appear when he was 16. The major seizures occurred without warning as generalized convulsions that involved loss of consciousness followed by

Efforts to develop an animal model of medial temporal lobe amnesia

The findings from H.M. were initially met with some skepticism, especially because early efforts to replicate his memory deficit in animals were unsuccessful. These efforts in fact began almost immediately when Scoville himself came to Montreal and did the same surgery in monkeys that he had done with H.M. (e.g., Correll & Scoville, 1960, 1965). However, these monkeys and others with medial temporal lesions were able to learn tasks that seemed similar to tasks that H.M. could not learn. For

Multiple memory systems

A major difficultly during the 1960s and 1970s was that it was not appreciated that tasks could be supported by different brain systems. Many of the tasks given to animals with hippocampal lesions were in fact skill-based tasks that amnesic patients would have been able to acquire, or they were tasks that animals could learn as a skill even if humans tended to learn the task by consciously memorizing the material. Establishing an animal model would require developing tasks that assess the type

One-trial memory tests and the successful development of an animal model

A key advance in establishing a model of human medial temporal lobe amnesia was the implementation of one-trial memory tests for the monkey that assess what one would now call declarative memory. In 1974, David Gaffan suggested that many tests of memory in animals with hippocampal damage might not be similar to the tests that reveal memory impairment in amnesic patients. Accordingly, if one wants to relate the animal work to work in humans it is not adequate to use any convenient test in which

The emergence of spontaneous novelty preference tasks (and an easy way to test recognition memory)

Coincidentally, at about the same time that H.M. was first described in 1957, the seeds were being planted for an important new behavioral test for visual recognition memory in the experimental animal. This paradigm would eventually become the most frequently used test of recognition memory in the experimental animal and an important tool for studying MTL amnesia.

In 1956 Robert Frantz described a method to study early visual development in animals (Frantz, 1956). The method had its genesis in

Initial insights from the animal model of human medial temporal lobe amnesia

Early work with the DNMS task revealed severe, delay-dependent memory impairment following large medial temporal lobe lesions that damaged the hippocampus, the amygdala, and the cortex underlying these structures (the H+A+ lesion; Mishkin, 1978). (The “+” denotes that the cortex immediately adjacent to the target structure was damaged.) The H+A+ lesion impaired memory more severely than when damage was restricted to the posterior medial temporal lobe and involved the hippocampus, the posterior

Amygdala damage is eliminated as a critical structure in amnesia

As noted above, it was initially supposed that the severe memory impairment observed in monkeys on the DNMS task was due to combined damage to the hippocampus and amygdala (Mishkin, 1978). However, subsequent studies revealed that impairment could not be attributed to amygdala damage. Thus, selective damage to the amygdala did not impair performance on the DNMS task and also did not exacerbate the memory impairment associated with the H+ lesion (Zola-Morgan, Squire, & Amaral, 1989b). In

The anatomy and organization of the medial temporal lobe

The system of structures important for recognition memory includes the hippocampus (dentate gyrus, CA fields and subiculum) and the entorhinal, perirhinal, and parahippocampal cortices (Fig. 1). Note that in the rat, the parahippocampal cortex is referred to as postrhinal cortex.

The hippocampus lies at the end of the processing hierarchy of the medial temporal lobe, receiving input from both the perirhinal and parahippocampal cortices as well as the entorhinal cortex (Fig. 2). Guided by the

The perirhinal cortex

Once a clear understanding that the cortical regions of the MTL were important for memory, it became important to characterize how they contributed. For example, the perirhinal cortex and area TE are immediately adjacent to each other in the temporal lobe and are reciprocally interconnected. These areas are thought to lie at the interface between visual perception and visual memory, but it has been unclear what their separate contributions might be. Studies of monkeys suggest that perirhinal

Recognition memory and the hippocampus

The title of the classic paper by Scoville and Milner (1957) was “Loss of recent memory after bilateral hippocampal lesions.” The title implied somewhat misleadingly, that the memory loss in patient H.M. was due to the direct damage to the hippocampus. However, the last paragraph of the paper states the point quite correctly: “It is concluded that the anterior hippocampus and hippocampal gyrus, either separately or together, are critically concerned in the retention of current experience.”

Conclusion

This article provides a brief history of the work that led to the view that the medial temporal lobe is predominately involved in a particular form of memory (declarative memory). The article also outlined how an animal model of amnesia in the monkey and in the rodent has been particularly valuable for evaluating and understanding the anatomy of recognition memory. The perirhinal cortex and hippocampus both appear to contribute in important ways to recognition memory (Squire et al., 2007). But

References (141)

  • A. Diamond

    Evidence of robust recognition memory early in life even when assessed by reaching behavior

    Journal of Experimental Child Psychology

    (1995)
  • R.J. Douglas et al.

    Learning and limbic lesions

    Neuropsychologia

    (1966)
  • A. Ennaceur et al.

    A new one-trial test for neurobiological studies of memory in rats. 1: Behavioral data

    Behavioral Brain Research

    (1988)
  • A. Ennaceur et al.

    Neurotoxic lesions of the perirhinal cortex do not mimic the behavioural effects of fornix transection in the rat

    Behavioral Brain Research

    (1996)
  • J.F. Fagan

    Memory in the infant

    Journal of Experimental Child Psychology

    (1970)
  • T.J. Gould et al.

    Effects of hippocampal lesions on patterned motor learning in the rat

    Brain Research Bulletin

    (2002)
  • R.S. Hammond et al.

    On the delay-dependent involvement of the hippocampus in object recognition memory

    Neurobiology of Learning and Memory

    (2004)
  • A.C. Lee et al.

    Perceptual deficits in amnesia: challenging the medial temporal lobe “mnemonic” view

    Neuropsychologia

    (2005)
  • N. O’Brien et al.

    Enhanced context-dependency of object recognition in rats with hippocampal lesions

    Behavioral Brain Research

    (2006)
  • O. Pascalis et al.

    Visual paired comparison performance is impaired in a patient with selective hippocampal lesions and relatively intact item recognition

    Neuropsychologia

    (2004)
  • J.P. Aggleton

    One-trial object recognition by rats

    Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

    (1985)
  • P. Alvarez et al.

    Damage limited to the hippocampal region produces long-lasting memory impairment in monkeys

    Journal of Neuroscience

    (1995)
  • J. Bachevalier

    Ontogenetic development of habit and memory formation in primates

    Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

    (1990)
  • J. Bachevalier et al.

    Limbic-dependent recognition memory in monkeys develops early in infancy

    Learning and Memory

    (1993)
  • K.B. Baker et al.

    Effects of stress and hippocampal NMDA receptor antagonism on recognition memory in rats

    Learning and Memory

    (2002)
  • S.J. Bartko et al.

    Perirhinal cortex resolves feature ambiguity in configural object recognition and perceptual oddity tasks

    Learning and Memory

    (2007)
  • S.J. Bartko et al.

    Perceptual functions of perirhinal cortex in rats: zero-delay object recognition and simultaneous oddity discriminations

    Journal of Neuroscience

    (2007)
  • M.G. Baxter et al.

    Opposite relationship of hippocampal and rhinal cortex damage to delayed nonmatching-to-sample deficits in monkeys

    Hippocampus

    (2001)
  • L.L. Beason-Held et al.

    Hippocampal formation lesions produce memory impairment in the rhesus monkey

    Hippocampus

    (1999)
  • M. von Bekhterev

    Demonstration eines Gehirns mit Zerstö rung der vorderen und inneren Theile der Hirnrinde beider Schlä fenlappen

    Neurologisches Zeitblatt

    (1900)
  • N.J. Broadbent et al.

    Spatial memory, recognition memory, and the hippocampus

    Proceedings of National Academy of Science of United States of America

    (2004)
  • N.J. Broadbent et al.

    Object recognition memory and the rodent hippocampus

    Learning and Memory

    (2010)
  • M.W. Brown et al.

    Recognition memory: what are the roles of the perirhinal cortex and hippocampus?

    Nature Reviews Neuroscience

    (2001)
  • M.J. Buckley et al.

    Selective perceptual impairments after perirhinal cortex ablation

    Journal of Neuroscience

    (2001)
  • E.A. Buffalo et al.

    Dissociation between the effects of damage to perirhinal cortex and area TE

    Learning and Memory

    (1999)
  • E.A. Buffalo et al.

    Perception and recognition memory in monkeys following lesions of area TE and perirhinal cortex

    Learning and Memory

    (2000)
  • T.J. Bussey et al.

    Functionally dissociating aspects of event memory: The effects of combined perirhinal and postrhinal cortex lesions on object and place memory in the rat

    Journal of Neuroscience

    (1999)
  • T.J. Bussey et al.

    Memory, perception, and the ventral visual-perirhinal-hippocampal stream: Thinking outside of the boxes

    Hippocampus

    (2007)
  • T.J. Bussey et al.

    Perirhinal cortex resolves feature ambiguity in complex visual discriminations

    European Journal of Neuroscience

    (2002)
  • T.J. Bussey et al.

    Impairments in visual discrimination after perirhinal cortex lesions: testing ‘declarative’ vs ‘perceptual-mnemonic’ views of perirhinal cortex function

    European Journal of Neuroscience

    (2003)
  • T.J. Bussey et al.

    Perirhinal cortex and feature-ambiguous discriminations

    Learning and Memory

    (2006)
  • C.V.H. Clark et al.

    Effect of bilateral hippocampal ablation on DRL performance

    Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology

    (1965)
  • R.E. Clark et al.

    Impaired recognition memory in rats after damage to the hippocampus

    Journal of Neuroscience

    (2000)
  • R.E. Clark et al.

    Rats with lesions of the hippocampus are impaired on the delayed nonmatching-to-sample task

    Hippocampus

    (2001)
  • N.J. Cohen et al.

    Preserved learning and retention of pattern analyzing skill in amnesia: Dissociation of knowing how and knowing that

    Science

    (1980)
  • S. Corkin

    Lasting consequences of bilateral medial temporal lobectomy: Clinical course and experimental findings in H.M.

    Seminars in Neurology

    (1984)
  • S. Corkin et al.

    H.M.’s medial temporal lobe lesion: Findings from magnetic resonance imaging

    Journal of Neuroscience

    (1997)
  • R.E. Correll et al.

    Effects of medial temporal lesions on visual discrimination performance

    Journal of Comparative & Physiological and Psychology

    (1965)
  • A. Diamond

    Rate of maturation of the hippocampus and the developmental progression of children's performance on the delayed non-matching to sample and visual paired comparison tasks

    Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

    (1990)
  • R.J. Douglas

    The hippocampus and behavior

    Psychology Bulletin

    (1967)
  • Cited by (61)

    • Neurobiology of Recognition Memory

      2017, Learning and Memory: A Comprehensive Reference
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text