Elsevier

Neuropsychologia

Volume 50, Issue 1, January 2012, Pages 11-18
Neuropsychologia

Working memory and amnesia: The role of stimulus novelty

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.10.016Get rights and content

Abstract

Despite the traditional view that damage to the hippocampus and/or surrounding areas of the medial temporal lobe (MTL) does not impair short-term or working memory (WM), recent research has shown MTL amnesics to be impaired on WM tasks that require maintaining a small amount of information over brief retention intervals (e.g., maintenance of a single face for one second). However, the types of tasks that have demonstrated WM impairments in amnesia tend to have involved novel stimuli. We hypothesized that WM may be impaired in amnesia for tasks that require maintaining novel information, but may be preserved for more familiar material, particularly if the material can be easily rehearsed. To test this hypothesis, patient HC, a 22-year-old developmental amnesic with relatively preserved semantic memory and 20 age and education matched controls performed a delayed match-to-sample task that required maintaining a single famous or non-famous face for 1–8 s, digit span and reading span tasks, and a modified Brown–Peterson task that required maintaining a single high- or low-frequency word or a non-word for 4–8 s. HC's performance was impaired for non-famous faces but preserved for famous faces, impaired for the reading span task but preserved for digit span, and it was impaired for non-words and unfamiliar low-frequency words but preserved for familiar words. These results support the hypothesis that an intact hippocampus is necessary for maintaining a single novel stimulus in WM. However, stimulus familiarity and rehearsal support WM via cortical regions independent of the MTL.

Highlights

► Working memory performance of a developmental amnesic was examined. ► The working memory tasks required maintaining one face or word for 1–8 s. ► Relative to controls, performance was impaired for novel stimuli (unknown faces or non-words). ► Performance was preserved for familiar stimuli (known famous faces or words). ► An intact hippocampus is necessary for maintaining a single novel stimulus in working memory.

Section snippets

Experiment 1

Experiment 1 was conducted to examine the impact of stimulus novelty on HC and controls’ performance on a visuospatial WM task. Similar to Ezzyat and Olson (2008), in Experiment 1 we administered a delayed match-to-sample (DMS) task that required maintaining the image of a single face in WM for 1000 or 8000 ms, and then selecting the matching face on a two-alternative forced-choice recognition test. Critically, the face was either of a famous person or a non-famous person.

Experiment 2

Experiment 2 was conducted to examine the impact of rehearsal and stimulus novelty on HC and controls’ performance on verbal WM tasks. To this end, we administered a simple WM span task (digit span) and a complex WM span task (reading span) to illustrate the importance of rehearsal in supporting verbal WM. If to-be-remembered items can be continuously rehearsed in mind all the while, then, at the time of recall, the items can simply be reported directly from the focus of attention (Cowan, 2001

General discussion

We found that HC was impaired at maintaining a single face in WM for 1–8 s, but only if it was a novel (non-famous) face; her performance was unimpaired for famous faces. The result concerning novel faces is similar to previous findings of Olson and colleagues (Ezzyat and Olson, 2008, Olson et al., 2006). The novel result is that, using the same testing procedure as Ezzyat and Olson (2008), the amnesic we tested was unimpaired when the face that was to be maintained was familiar. This finding is

Conclusion

In summary, the findings of the present study show that whether a task requires representing and maintaining novel (or familiar) stimuli in WM is an important factor that impacts the extent to which the MTL is necessary to perform the task (see also, Jonides et al., 2008, Stern et al., 2001). Thus, it may be better to conceptualize memory over the short-term and long-term as relying on similar or different processes and brain regions depending on particular aspects of the task (i.e., rehearsal,

References (41)

  • C. Hulme et al.

    Memory for familiar and unfamiliar words: Evidence for a long-term memory contribution to short-term memory span

    Journal of Memory and Language

    (1991)
  • A.M. Owen et al.

    Visuo-spatial short-term recognition memory and learning after temporal lobe excisions, frontal lobe excisions or amygdalo-hippocampectomy in man

    Neuropsychologia

    (1995)
  • C. Ranganath et al.

    Medial temporal lobe activity associated with active maintenance of novel information

    Neuron

    (2001)
  • C. Ranganath et al.

    Doubts about double dissociations between short- and long-term memory

    Trends in Cognitive Science

    (2005)
  • E.K. Warrington et al.

    The contribution of the right parietal lobe to object recognition

    Cortex

    (1973)
  • D.A. Balota et al.

    The English Lexicon Project

    Behavior Research Methods

    (2007)
  • J. Brown

    Some tests of the decay theory of immediate memory

    Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

    (1958)
  • E.A. Buffalo et al.

    The human perirhinal cortex and recognition memory

    Hippocampus

    (1998)
  • N. Cowan

    The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity

    Behavioral and Brain Sciences

    (2001)
  • F.I.M. Craik et al.

    Age differences in the temporal integration of language

    British Journal of Psychology

    (1967)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text